Cargando…

Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co

BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been the subject of a numerous research projects over the past year. In cases with a severe disease course or threatening long-term impairment due to disease, the German health care system offers insured persons the possibility of medical reh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutsch, Mercedes, Frommhold, Jördis, Buhr-Schinner, Heike, Djeiranachvili, Levan, Gross, Thomas, Schüller, Per Otto, Katalinic, Alexander, Deck, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06378-4
_version_ 1783681650594414592
author Rutsch, Mercedes
Frommhold, Jördis
Buhr-Schinner, Heike
Djeiranachvili, Levan
Gross, Thomas
Schüller, Per Otto
Katalinic, Alexander
Deck, Ruth
author_facet Rutsch, Mercedes
Frommhold, Jördis
Buhr-Schinner, Heike
Djeiranachvili, Levan
Gross, Thomas
Schüller, Per Otto
Katalinic, Alexander
Deck, Ruth
author_sort Rutsch, Mercedes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been the subject of a numerous research projects over the past year. In cases with a severe disease course or threatening long-term impairment due to disease, the German health care system offers insured persons the possibility of medical rehabilitation. In contrast to what was observed and expected at the beginning of the pandemic, COVID-19 patients with varying degrees of disease severity are represented in rehabilitation. To date, there is no common consensus on the content and aftercare of rehabilitation nor is there any knowledge about the short- and long-term effects of such a rehabilitation programme. In addition, these aspects were not considered with regard to the varying severity of the course of the disease. The present research project investigates this question. METHODS: The study sample will consist of N = 350 rehabilitants after COVID-19 and a comparison group (CG) with N = 230 rehabilitants suffering from an obstructive respiratory disease. The participants will be recruited at five German rehabilitation facilities and undergo medical rehabilitation. This prospective, exploratory, multicentre, mixed-methods study will be evaluated as follows: (A) The quantitative portion includes questionnaires at different points in time (at the beginning and end of rehabilitation, after six and twelve months) and contains standardised measurement instruments. For example, participation limitations, quality of life, health status, fatigue, psychomental limitations and disorders, performance in different areas of life and ability to work are measured. (B) Qualitative interviews are held at different times (end of rehabilitation, after six and twelve months), and an expert workshop is conducted. Topics are rehabilitation content, satisfaction and aftercare as well as different outcomes on subjective health and participation impairments. DISCUSSION: Studies on other indications have already shown that pneumological rehabilitation has positive effects. Thus, it is expected that an improvement in different dimensions will be observed at the end of rehabilitation in both groups. With regard to the different severities of COVID-19, this study evaluates the long-term developments. Subsequently, the authors will elaborate concrete recommendations for medical rehabilitation after different courses of disease with regard to existing pneumological rehabilitation concepts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Register of Clinical Trials, www.drks.de.Identifier: DRKS00023642; Registered: 01.12.2020.Date and version identifier: 08.04.2021; version 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80618752021-04-23 Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co Rutsch, Mercedes Frommhold, Jördis Buhr-Schinner, Heike Djeiranachvili, Levan Gross, Thomas Schüller, Per Otto Katalinic, Alexander Deck, Ruth BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been the subject of a numerous research projects over the past year. In cases with a severe disease course or threatening long-term impairment due to disease, the German health care system offers insured persons the possibility of medical rehabilitation. In contrast to what was observed and expected at the beginning of the pandemic, COVID-19 patients with varying degrees of disease severity are represented in rehabilitation. To date, there is no common consensus on the content and aftercare of rehabilitation nor is there any knowledge about the short- and long-term effects of such a rehabilitation programme. In addition, these aspects were not considered with regard to the varying severity of the course of the disease. The present research project investigates this question. METHODS: The study sample will consist of N = 350 rehabilitants after COVID-19 and a comparison group (CG) with N = 230 rehabilitants suffering from an obstructive respiratory disease. The participants will be recruited at five German rehabilitation facilities and undergo medical rehabilitation. This prospective, exploratory, multicentre, mixed-methods study will be evaluated as follows: (A) The quantitative portion includes questionnaires at different points in time (at the beginning and end of rehabilitation, after six and twelve months) and contains standardised measurement instruments. For example, participation limitations, quality of life, health status, fatigue, psychomental limitations and disorders, performance in different areas of life and ability to work are measured. (B) Qualitative interviews are held at different times (end of rehabilitation, after six and twelve months), and an expert workshop is conducted. Topics are rehabilitation content, satisfaction and aftercare as well as different outcomes on subjective health and participation impairments. DISCUSSION: Studies on other indications have already shown that pneumological rehabilitation has positive effects. Thus, it is expected that an improvement in different dimensions will be observed at the end of rehabilitation in both groups. With regard to the different severities of COVID-19, this study evaluates the long-term developments. Subsequently, the authors will elaborate concrete recommendations for medical rehabilitation after different courses of disease with regard to existing pneumological rehabilitation concepts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Register of Clinical Trials, www.drks.de.Identifier: DRKS00023642; Registered: 01.12.2020.Date and version identifier: 08.04.2021; version 4. BioMed Central 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8061875/ /pubmed/33888104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06378-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rutsch, Mercedes
Frommhold, Jördis
Buhr-Schinner, Heike
Djeiranachvili, Levan
Gross, Thomas
Schüller, Per Otto
Katalinic, Alexander
Deck, Ruth
Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co
title Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co
title_full Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co
title_fullStr Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co
title_short Study protocol medical rehabilitation after COVID-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / Re_Co
title_sort study protocol medical rehabilitation after covid-19 disease: an observational study with a comparison group with obstructive airway disease / re_co
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33888104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06378-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rutschmercedes studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT frommholdjordis studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT buhrschinnerheike studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT djeiranachvililevan studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT grossthomas studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT schullerperotto studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT katalinicalexander studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco
AT deckruth studyprotocolmedicalrehabilitationaftercovid19diseaseanobservationalstudywithacomparisongroupwithobstructiveairwaydiseasereco