Cargando…

3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery (3D-FGAPSIR) with conventional 3D-Short-Tau Inversion Recovery (3D-STIR) and sagittal T1-and T2-weighted MRI dataset at 3 Tesla when detecting MS spinal cord lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goujon, Adrien, Mirafzal, Sonia, Zuber, Kevin, Deschamps, Romain, Sadik, Jean-Claude, Gout, Olivier, Savatovsky, Julien, Lecler, Augustin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33886586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247813
_version_ 1783681672540061696
author Goujon, Adrien
Mirafzal, Sonia
Zuber, Kevin
Deschamps, Romain
Sadik, Jean-Claude
Gout, Olivier
Savatovsky, Julien
Lecler, Augustin
author_facet Goujon, Adrien
Mirafzal, Sonia
Zuber, Kevin
Deschamps, Romain
Sadik, Jean-Claude
Gout, Olivier
Savatovsky, Julien
Lecler, Augustin
author_sort Goujon, Adrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery (3D-FGAPSIR) with conventional 3D-Short-Tau Inversion Recovery (3D-STIR) and sagittal T1-and T2-weighted MRI dataset at 3 Tesla when detecting MS spinal cord lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective single-center study was approved by an institutional review board and enrolled participants from December 2016 to August 2018. Two neuroradiologists blinded to all data, individually analyzed the 3D-FGAPSIR and the conventional datasets separately and in random order. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus by a third neuroradiologist. The primary judgment criterion was the number of MS spinal cord lesions. Secondary judgment criteria included lesion enhancement, lesion delineation, reader-reported confidence and lesion-to-cord-contrast-ratio. A Wilcoxon’s test was used to compare the two datasets. RESULTS: 51 participants were included. 3D-FGAPSIR detected significantly more lesions than the conventional dataset (344 versus 171 respectively, p<0.001). Two participants had no detected lesion on the conventional dataset, whereas 3D-FGAPSIR detected at least one lesion. 3/51 participants had a single enhancing lesion detected by both datasets. Lesion delineation and reader-reported confidence were significantly higher with 3D-FGAPSIR: 4.5 (IQR 1) versus 2 (IQR 0.5), p<0.0001 and 4.5 (IQR 1) versus 2.5 (IQR 0.5), p<0.0001. Lesion-to-cord-contrast-ratio was significantly higher using 3D-FGAPSIR as opposed to 3D-STIR and T2: 1.4 (IQR 0,3) versus 0.4 (IQR 0,1) and 0.3 (IQR 0,1)(p = 0.04). Correlations with clinical data and inter- and intra-observer agreements were higher with 3D-FGAPSIR. CONCLUSION: 3D-FGAPSIR improved overall MS spinal cord lesion detection as compared to conventional set and detected all enhancing lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8061976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80619762021-05-04 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis Goujon, Adrien Mirafzal, Sonia Zuber, Kevin Deschamps, Romain Sadik, Jean-Claude Gout, Olivier Savatovsky, Julien Lecler, Augustin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery (3D-FGAPSIR) with conventional 3D-Short-Tau Inversion Recovery (3D-STIR) and sagittal T1-and T2-weighted MRI dataset at 3 Tesla when detecting MS spinal cord lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective single-center study was approved by an institutional review board and enrolled participants from December 2016 to August 2018. Two neuroradiologists blinded to all data, individually analyzed the 3D-FGAPSIR and the conventional datasets separately and in random order. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus by a third neuroradiologist. The primary judgment criterion was the number of MS spinal cord lesions. Secondary judgment criteria included lesion enhancement, lesion delineation, reader-reported confidence and lesion-to-cord-contrast-ratio. A Wilcoxon’s test was used to compare the two datasets. RESULTS: 51 participants were included. 3D-FGAPSIR detected significantly more lesions than the conventional dataset (344 versus 171 respectively, p<0.001). Two participants had no detected lesion on the conventional dataset, whereas 3D-FGAPSIR detected at least one lesion. 3/51 participants had a single enhancing lesion detected by both datasets. Lesion delineation and reader-reported confidence were significantly higher with 3D-FGAPSIR: 4.5 (IQR 1) versus 2 (IQR 0.5), p<0.0001 and 4.5 (IQR 1) versus 2.5 (IQR 0.5), p<0.0001. Lesion-to-cord-contrast-ratio was significantly higher using 3D-FGAPSIR as opposed to 3D-STIR and T2: 1.4 (IQR 0,3) versus 0.4 (IQR 0,1) and 0.3 (IQR 0,1)(p = 0.04). Correlations with clinical data and inter- and intra-observer agreements were higher with 3D-FGAPSIR. CONCLUSION: 3D-FGAPSIR improved overall MS spinal cord lesion detection as compared to conventional set and detected all enhancing lesions. Public Library of Science 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8061976/ /pubmed/33886586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247813 Text en © 2021 Goujon et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goujon, Adrien
Mirafzal, Sonia
Zuber, Kevin
Deschamps, Romain
Sadik, Jean-Claude
Gout, Olivier
Savatovsky, Julien
Lecler, Augustin
3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
title 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short 3D-Fast Gray Matter Acquisition with Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort 3d-fast gray matter acquisition with phase sensitive inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla: application for detection of spinal cord lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8061976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33886586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247813
work_keys_str_mv AT goujonadrien 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT mirafzalsonia 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT zuberkevin 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT deschampsromain 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT sadikjeanclaude 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT goutolivier 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT savatovskyjulien 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT lecleraugustin 3dfastgraymatteracquisitionwithphasesensitiveinversionrecoverymagneticresonanceimagingat3teslaapplicationfordetectionofspinalcordlesionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis