Cargando…

The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills

Assessment has long played an important role as a measurement tool of student mastery over course content. However, testing has also been shown to be an effective learning tool. Cumulative testing, in which all material from the entire learning period is covered, has been assumed to be effective, ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Elizabeth G., Greenall, Rebeka F., Tullis, Madeleine M., Williams, Kurt R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33886630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250143
_version_ 1783681678396358656
author Bailey, Elizabeth G.
Greenall, Rebeka F.
Tullis, Madeleine M.
Williams, Kurt R.
author_facet Bailey, Elizabeth G.
Greenall, Rebeka F.
Tullis, Madeleine M.
Williams, Kurt R.
author_sort Bailey, Elizabeth G.
collection PubMed
description Assessment has long played an important role as a measurement tool of student mastery over course content. However, testing has also been shown to be an effective learning tool. Cumulative testing, in which all material from the entire learning period is covered, has been assumed to be effective, yet few studies have explicitly tested its effectiveness compared to non-cumulative testing. Studies in psychology and mathematics courses suggest that cumulative final exams increase long-term retention of information, and cumulative testing during the semester can increase cumulative final exam performance and long-term retention. Because frequent testing has also been shown to increase student learning, the purpose of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate the effects of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms on student learning in a course that uses frequent assessment. In this study, one section of an introductory biology course for non-majors was given seven cumulative midterms, with about half of the questions drawn from previous units and the rest covering the current unit. The other section was given seven non-cumulative midterms that focused on current material while other course characteristics were held constant. Student performance on a common, cumulative final exam and a retention exam five months later were compared. Midterm format had no effect on final exam performance, contradicting the few studies done in psychology and mathematics courses. Thus, there may be no additional benefit of cumulative testing if exams are given frequently. Cumulative midterms appeared to increase retention after five months, but only for students who entered the course with low reasoning skills. Interestingly, students with high reasoning skills appeared to retain more from the course if they were given non-cumulative midterms. Possible explanations and ideas for future research are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8062001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80620012021-05-04 The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills Bailey, Elizabeth G. Greenall, Rebeka F. Tullis, Madeleine M. Williams, Kurt R. PLoS One Research Article Assessment has long played an important role as a measurement tool of student mastery over course content. However, testing has also been shown to be an effective learning tool. Cumulative testing, in which all material from the entire learning period is covered, has been assumed to be effective, yet few studies have explicitly tested its effectiveness compared to non-cumulative testing. Studies in psychology and mathematics courses suggest that cumulative final exams increase long-term retention of information, and cumulative testing during the semester can increase cumulative final exam performance and long-term retention. Because frequent testing has also been shown to increase student learning, the purpose of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate the effects of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms on student learning in a course that uses frequent assessment. In this study, one section of an introductory biology course for non-majors was given seven cumulative midterms, with about half of the questions drawn from previous units and the rest covering the current unit. The other section was given seven non-cumulative midterms that focused on current material while other course characteristics were held constant. Student performance on a common, cumulative final exam and a retention exam five months later were compared. Midterm format had no effect on final exam performance, contradicting the few studies done in psychology and mathematics courses. Thus, there may be no additional benefit of cumulative testing if exams are given frequently. Cumulative midterms appeared to increase retention after five months, but only for students who entered the course with low reasoning skills. Interestingly, students with high reasoning skills appeared to retain more from the course if they were given non-cumulative midterms. Possible explanations and ideas for future research are discussed. Public Library of Science 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8062001/ /pubmed/33886630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250143 Text en © 2021 Bailey et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bailey, Elizabeth G.
Greenall, Rebeka F.
Tullis, Madeleine M.
Williams, Kurt R.
The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
title The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
title_full The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
title_fullStr The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
title_full_unstemmed The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
title_short The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
title_sort retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33886630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250143
work_keys_str_mv AT baileyelizabethg theretentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT greenallrebekaf theretentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT tullismadeleinem theretentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT williamskurtr theretentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT baileyelizabethg retentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT greenallrebekaf retentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT tullismadeleinem retentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills
AT williamskurtr retentionbenefitsofcumulativeversusnoncumulativemidtermsinintroductorybiologymaydependonstudentsreasoningskills