Cargando…
Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps
Background and study aims A novel endoscopic optical diagnosis classification system (SIMPLE) has recently been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the SIMPLE classification in a clinical cohort. Patients and methods All diminutive and small colorectal polyps found in a cohort of individuals u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1388-6694 |
_version_ | 1783681725688184832 |
---|---|
author | Alaoui, Ahmed Amine Oumedjbeur, Kussil Djinbachian, Roupen Marchand, Étienne Marques, Paola N. Bouin, Mickael Bouchard, Simon von Renteln, Daniel |
author_facet | Alaoui, Ahmed Amine Oumedjbeur, Kussil Djinbachian, Roupen Marchand, Étienne Marques, Paola N. Bouin, Mickael Bouchard, Simon von Renteln, Daniel |
author_sort | Alaoui, Ahmed Amine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims A novel endoscopic optical diagnosis classification system (SIMPLE) has recently been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the SIMPLE classification in a clinical cohort. Patients and methods All diminutive and small colorectal polyps found in a cohort of individuals undergoing screening, diagnostic, or surveillance colonoscopies underwent optical diagnosis using image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) and the SIMPLE classification. The primary outcome was the agreement of surveillance intervals determined by optical diagnosis compared with pathology-based results for diminutive polyps. Secondary outcomes included the negative predictive value (NPV) for rectosigmoid adenomas, the percentage of pathology exams avoided, and the percentage of immediate surveillance interval recommendations. Analysis of optical diagnosis for polyps ≤ 10 mm was also performed. Results 399 patients (median age 62.6 years; 55.6 % female) were enrolled. For patients with at least one polyp ≤ 5 mm undergoing optical diagnosis, agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals was 93.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 91.4–95.6). The NPV for rectosigmoid adenomas was 86.7 % (95 %CI 77.5–93.2). When using optical diagnosis, pathology analysis could be avoided in 61.5 % (95 %CI 56.9–66.2) of diminutive polyps, and post-colonoscopy surveillance intervals could be given immediately to 70.9 % (95 %CI 66.5–75.4) of patients. For patients with at least one ≤ 10 mm polyp, agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals was 92.7 % (95 %CI 89.7–95.1). NPV for rectosigmoid adenomas ≤ 10 mm was 85.1 % (95 %CI CI 76.3–91.6). Conclusions IEE with the SIMPLE classification achieved the quality benchmark for the resect and discard strategy; however, the NPV for rectosigmoid polyps requires improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8062223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80622232021-05-01 Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps Alaoui, Ahmed Amine Oumedjbeur, Kussil Djinbachian, Roupen Marchand, Étienne Marques, Paola N. Bouin, Mickael Bouchard, Simon von Renteln, Daniel Endosc Int Open Background and study aims A novel endoscopic optical diagnosis classification system (SIMPLE) has recently been developed. This study aimed to evaluate the SIMPLE classification in a clinical cohort. Patients and methods All diminutive and small colorectal polyps found in a cohort of individuals undergoing screening, diagnostic, or surveillance colonoscopies underwent optical diagnosis using image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) and the SIMPLE classification. The primary outcome was the agreement of surveillance intervals determined by optical diagnosis compared with pathology-based results for diminutive polyps. Secondary outcomes included the negative predictive value (NPV) for rectosigmoid adenomas, the percentage of pathology exams avoided, and the percentage of immediate surveillance interval recommendations. Analysis of optical diagnosis for polyps ≤ 10 mm was also performed. Results 399 patients (median age 62.6 years; 55.6 % female) were enrolled. For patients with at least one polyp ≤ 5 mm undergoing optical diagnosis, agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals was 93.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 91.4–95.6). The NPV for rectosigmoid adenomas was 86.7 % (95 %CI 77.5–93.2). When using optical diagnosis, pathology analysis could be avoided in 61.5 % (95 %CI 56.9–66.2) of diminutive polyps, and post-colonoscopy surveillance intervals could be given immediately to 70.9 % (95 %CI 66.5–75.4) of patients. For patients with at least one ≤ 10 mm polyp, agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals was 92.7 % (95 %CI 89.7–95.1). NPV for rectosigmoid adenomas ≤ 10 mm was 85.1 % (95 %CI CI 76.3–91.6). Conclusions IEE with the SIMPLE classification achieved the quality benchmark for the resect and discard strategy; however, the NPV for rectosigmoid polyps requires improvement. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-05 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8062223/ /pubmed/33937508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1388-6694 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Alaoui, Ahmed Amine Oumedjbeur, Kussil Djinbachian, Roupen Marchand, Étienne Marques, Paola N. Bouin, Mickael Bouchard, Simon von Renteln, Daniel Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
title | Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
title_full | Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
title_fullStr | Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
title_short | Clinical validation of the SIMPLE classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
title_sort | clinical validation of the simple classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1388-6694 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alaouiahmedamine clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT oumedjbeurkussil clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT djinbachianroupen clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT marchandetienne clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT marquespaolan clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT bouinmickael clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT bouchardsimon clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps AT vonrentelndaniel clinicalvalidationofthesimpleclassificationforopticaldiagnosisofcolorectalpolyps |