Cargando…
Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability?
What makes some words more memorable than others? Words can vary in many dimensions, and a variety of lexical, semantic, and affective properties have previously been associated with variability in recall performance. Free recall data were used from 147 participants across 20 experimental sessions f...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063179 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w |
_version_ | 1783681748617396224 |
---|---|
author | Madan, Christopher R. |
author_facet | Madan, Christopher R. |
author_sort | Madan, Christopher R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | What makes some words more memorable than others? Words can vary in many dimensions, and a variety of lexical, semantic, and affective properties have previously been associated with variability in recall performance. Free recall data were used from 147 participants across 20 experimental sessions from the Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study (PEERS) data set, across 1,638 words. Here, I consider how well 20 different word properties—across lexical, semantic, and affective dimensions—relate to free recall. Semantic dimensions, particularly animacy (better memory for living), usefulness (with respect to survival; better memory for useful), and size (better memory for larger) demonstrated the strongest relationships with recall probability. These key results were then examined and replicated in the free recall data from Lau, Goh, and Yap (Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 2207–2222, 2018), which had 532 words and 116 participants. This comprehensive investigation of a variety of word memorability demonstrates that semantic and function-related psycholinguistic properties play an important role in verbal memory processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8062370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80623702021-05-05 Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? Madan, Christopher R. Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report What makes some words more memorable than others? Words can vary in many dimensions, and a variety of lexical, semantic, and affective properties have previously been associated with variability in recall performance. Free recall data were used from 147 participants across 20 experimental sessions from the Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study (PEERS) data set, across 1,638 words. Here, I consider how well 20 different word properties—across lexical, semantic, and affective dimensions—relate to free recall. Semantic dimensions, particularly animacy (better memory for living), usefulness (with respect to survival; better memory for useful), and size (better memory for larger) demonstrated the strongest relationships with recall probability. These key results were then examined and replicated in the free recall data from Lau, Goh, and Yap (Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 2207–2222, 2018), which had 532 words and 116 participants. This comprehensive investigation of a variety of word memorability demonstrates that semantic and function-related psycholinguistic properties play an important role in verbal memory processes. Springer US 2020-10-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8062370/ /pubmed/33063179 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Madan, Christopher R. Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
title | Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
title_full | Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
title_fullStr | Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
title_short | Exploring word memorability: How well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
title_sort | exploring word memorability: how well do different word properties explain item free-recall probability? |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063179 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01820-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madanchristopherr exploringwordmemorabilityhowwelldodifferentwordpropertiesexplainitemfreerecallprobability |