Cargando…

Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research

Background: Funded health research is being published in journals that many regard as “predatory”, deceptive, and non-credible. We do not currently know whether funders provide guidance on how to select a journal in which to publish funded health research. Methods: We identified the largest 46 phila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shamseer, Larissa, Cobey, Kelly D., Page, Matthew J., Brehaut, Jamie C., Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Straus, Sharon E., Stewart, Lesley A., Moher, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8063518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953906
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27745.2
_version_ 1783681964278022144
author Shamseer, Larissa
Cobey, Kelly D.
Page, Matthew J.
Brehaut, Jamie C.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Straus, Sharon E.
Stewart, Lesley A.
Moher, David
author_facet Shamseer, Larissa
Cobey, Kelly D.
Page, Matthew J.
Brehaut, Jamie C.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Straus, Sharon E.
Stewart, Lesley A.
Moher, David
author_sort Shamseer, Larissa
collection PubMed
description Background: Funded health research is being published in journals that many regard as “predatory”, deceptive, and non-credible. We do not currently know whether funders provide guidance on how to select a journal in which to publish funded health research. Methods: We identified the largest 46 philanthropic, public, development assistance, public-private partnership, and multilateral funders of health research by expenditure, globally as well as four public funders from lower-middle income countries, from the list at https://healthresearchfunders.org. One of us identified guidance on disseminating funded research from each funders’ website (August/September 2017), then extracted information about selecting journals, which was verified by another assessor. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. Results were summarized descriptively. This research used publicly available information; we did not seek verification with funding bodies. Results: The majority (44/50) of sampled funders indicated funding health research. 38 (of 44, 86%) had publicly available information about disseminating funded research, typically called “policies” (29, 76%). Of these 38, 36 (95%) mentioned journal publication for dissemination of which 13 (36.11%) offer variable guidance on selecting a journal, all of which relate to the funder’s open access mandate. Six funders (17%) outlined publisher requirements or features by which to select a journal. One funder linked to a document providing features of journals to look for (e.g. listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals) and to be wary of (e.g., no journal scope statement, uses direct and unsolicited marketing). Conclusions: Few funders provided guidance on how to select a journal in which to publish funded research. Funders have a duty to ensure that the research they fund is discoverable by others. This research is a benchmark for funder guidance on journal selection prior to the January 2021 implementation of Plan S (a global, funder-led initiative to ensure immediate, open access to funded, published research).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8063518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80635182021-05-04 Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research Shamseer, Larissa Cobey, Kelly D. Page, Matthew J. Brehaut, Jamie C. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Straus, Sharon E. Stewart, Lesley A. Moher, David F1000Res Research Article Background: Funded health research is being published in journals that many regard as “predatory”, deceptive, and non-credible. We do not currently know whether funders provide guidance on how to select a journal in which to publish funded health research. Methods: We identified the largest 46 philanthropic, public, development assistance, public-private partnership, and multilateral funders of health research by expenditure, globally as well as four public funders from lower-middle income countries, from the list at https://healthresearchfunders.org. One of us identified guidance on disseminating funded research from each funders’ website (August/September 2017), then extracted information about selecting journals, which was verified by another assessor. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. Results were summarized descriptively. This research used publicly available information; we did not seek verification with funding bodies. Results: The majority (44/50) of sampled funders indicated funding health research. 38 (of 44, 86%) had publicly available information about disseminating funded research, typically called “policies” (29, 76%). Of these 38, 36 (95%) mentioned journal publication for dissemination of which 13 (36.11%) offer variable guidance on selecting a journal, all of which relate to the funder’s open access mandate. Six funders (17%) outlined publisher requirements or features by which to select a journal. One funder linked to a document providing features of journals to look for (e.g. listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals) and to be wary of (e.g., no journal scope statement, uses direct and unsolicited marketing). Conclusions: Few funders provided guidance on how to select a journal in which to publish funded research. Funders have a duty to ensure that the research they fund is discoverable by others. This research is a benchmark for funder guidance on journal selection prior to the January 2021 implementation of Plan S (a global, funder-led initiative to ensure immediate, open access to funded, published research). F1000 Research Limited 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8063518/ /pubmed/33953906 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27745.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Shamseer L et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shamseer, Larissa
Cobey, Kelly D.
Page, Matthew J.
Brehaut, Jamie C.
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Straus, Sharon E.
Stewart, Lesley A.
Moher, David
Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
title Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
title_full Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
title_fullStr Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
title_full_unstemmed Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
title_short Top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
title_sort top health research funders’ guidance on selecting journals for funded research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8063518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33953906
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27745.2
work_keys_str_mv AT shamseerlarissa tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT cobeykellyd tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT pagematthewj tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT brehautjamiec tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT grimshawjeremym tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT straussharone tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT stewartlesleya tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch
AT moherdavid tophealthresearchfundersguidanceonselectingjournalsforfundedresearch