Cargando…

Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine evidence map: a methodology to an overflowing field of data and noise

Every day there is criticism about lack of evidence on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM). But is this narrative evidence-based? Are we really missing research about TCIM? Or are we just not looking correctly at the evidence? Evidence maps are a useful method with the dual f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schveitzer, Mariana Cabral, Abdala, Carmen Verônica Mendes, Portella, Caio Fabio Schlechta, Ghelman, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907557
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.48
Descripción
Sumario:Every day there is criticism about lack of evidence on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM). But is this narrative evidence-based? Are we really missing research about TCIM? Or are we just not looking correctly at the evidence? Evidence maps are a useful method with the dual function of synthesizing available evidence on a specific topic and identifying knowledge gaps. This article presents a six-step evidence map methodology along with recently published TCIM evidence maps, including one related to COVID-19. TCIM evidence maps are useful instruments to inform decision-making for policymakers, health practitioners, and patients.