Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
BACKGROUND: The C-TASK-FORCE phase I/II and Danish randomized phase II trials reported the promising efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there had been no direct comparative phase III trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33959196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211009143 |
_version_ | 1783682151424720896 |
---|---|
author | Chida, Keigo Kotani, Daisuke Nakamura, Yoshiaki Kawazoe, Akihito Kuboki, Yasutoshi Shitara, Kohei Kojima, Takashi Taniguchi, Hiroya Watanabe, Jun Endo, Itaru Yoshino, Takayuki |
author_facet | Chida, Keigo Kotani, Daisuke Nakamura, Yoshiaki Kawazoe, Akihito Kuboki, Yasutoshi Shitara, Kohei Kojima, Takashi Taniguchi, Hiroya Watanabe, Jun Endo, Itaru Yoshino, Takayuki |
author_sort | Chida, Keigo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The C-TASK-FORCE phase I/II and Danish randomized phase II trials reported the promising efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there had been no direct comparative phase III trial to compare the efficacy between TAS102 plus BEV and standard therapy with either TAS102 or regorafenib monotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC who received TAS102 plus BEV, TAS102 monotherapy, or regorafenib monotherapy after standard chemotherapies during 2013–2019. RESULTS: Patients received TAS102 plus BEV (n = 139), TAS102 monotherapy (n = 153), or regorafenib monotherapy (n = 133). With a median follow-up of 25.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.9–13.9] for TAS102 plus BEV, 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.8–9.2) for TAS102 monotherapy, and 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7–8.5) for regorafenib monotherapy. The hazard ratios were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51–0.88) for TAS102 plus BEV versus TAS102 monotherapy and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54–0.94) for TAS102 plus BEV versus regorafenib monotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4) for TAS102 plus BEV, 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.3) for TAS102 monotherapy, and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.3) for regorafenib monotherapy. The hazard ratios were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45–0.73) for TAS102 plus BEV versus TAS102 monotherapy and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.34–0.58) for TAS102 plus BEV versus regorafenib monotherapy. On multivariate analysis, TAS102 plus BEV was independently correlated with better OS and PFS. No unexpected adverse events were observed in any group. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that OS and PFS are longer in patients treated with TAS102 plus BEV than in those treated with TAS102 or regorafenib monotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8064512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80645122021-05-05 Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study Chida, Keigo Kotani, Daisuke Nakamura, Yoshiaki Kawazoe, Akihito Kuboki, Yasutoshi Shitara, Kohei Kojima, Takashi Taniguchi, Hiroya Watanabe, Jun Endo, Itaru Yoshino, Takayuki Ther Adv Med Oncol Original Research BACKGROUND: The C-TASK-FORCE phase I/II and Danish randomized phase II trials reported the promising efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS102) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there had been no direct comparative phase III trial to compare the efficacy between TAS102 plus BEV and standard therapy with either TAS102 or regorafenib monotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with mCRC who received TAS102 plus BEV, TAS102 monotherapy, or regorafenib monotherapy after standard chemotherapies during 2013–2019. RESULTS: Patients received TAS102 plus BEV (n = 139), TAS102 monotherapy (n = 153), or regorafenib monotherapy (n = 133). With a median follow-up of 25.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.9–13.9] for TAS102 plus BEV, 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.8–9.2) for TAS102 monotherapy, and 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7–8.5) for regorafenib monotherapy. The hazard ratios were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51–0.88) for TAS102 plus BEV versus TAS102 monotherapy and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54–0.94) for TAS102 plus BEV versus regorafenib monotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4) for TAS102 plus BEV, 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.3) for TAS102 monotherapy, and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.3) for regorafenib monotherapy. The hazard ratios were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45–0.73) for TAS102 plus BEV versus TAS102 monotherapy and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.34–0.58) for TAS102 plus BEV versus regorafenib monotherapy. On multivariate analysis, TAS102 plus BEV was independently correlated with better OS and PFS. No unexpected adverse events were observed in any group. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that OS and PFS are longer in patients treated with TAS102 plus BEV than in those treated with TAS102 or regorafenib monotherapy. SAGE Publications 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8064512/ /pubmed/33959196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211009143 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chida, Keigo Kotani, Daisuke Nakamura, Yoshiaki Kawazoe, Akihito Kuboki, Yasutoshi Shitara, Kohei Kojima, Takashi Taniguchi, Hiroya Watanabe, Jun Endo, Itaru Yoshino, Takayuki Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
title | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab and trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33959196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211009143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chidakeigo efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT kotanidaisuke efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT nakamurayoshiaki efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT kawazoeakihito efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT kubokiyasutoshi efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT shitarakohei efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT kojimatakashi efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT taniguchihiroya efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT watanabejun efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT endoitaru efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy AT yoshinotakayuki efficacyandsafetyoftrifluridinetipiracilplusbevacizumabandtrifluridinetipiracilorregorafenibmonotherapyforchemorefractorymetastaticcolorectalcanceraretrospectivestudy |