Cargando…

DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results

PURPOSE: The search for predictors of antidepressant response is gaining increasing attention, with epigenetic markers attracting a great deal of interest. We performed a genome-wide study assessing baseline differences in DNA methylation between Responders and Non-Responders. PATIENTS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez-Pinteño, Albert, Rodriguez, Natalia, Blázquez, Ana, Plana, Maria Teresa, Varela, Eva, Gassó, Patricia, Lafuente, Amalia, Lazaro, Luisa, Mas, Sergi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907441
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S289480
_version_ 1783682193893097472
author Martinez-Pinteño, Albert
Rodriguez, Natalia
Blázquez, Ana
Plana, Maria Teresa
Varela, Eva
Gassó, Patricia
Lafuente, Amalia
Lazaro, Luisa
Mas, Sergi
author_facet Martinez-Pinteño, Albert
Rodriguez, Natalia
Blázquez, Ana
Plana, Maria Teresa
Varela, Eva
Gassó, Patricia
Lafuente, Amalia
Lazaro, Luisa
Mas, Sergi
author_sort Martinez-Pinteño, Albert
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The search for predictors of antidepressant response is gaining increasing attention, with epigenetic markers attracting a great deal of interest. We performed a genome-wide study assessing baseline differences in DNA methylation between Responders and Non-Responders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two children and adolescents, receiving fluoxetine treatment for the first time, were classified as Responders or Non-Responders according to CGI-I score after 8 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. Genome-wide DNA methylation was profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip Kit and analyzed using the Chip Analysis Methylation Pipeline (ChAMP). RESULTS: We identified 21 CpG sites significantly (FDR<0.05) associated with fluoxetine response that showed meaningful differences (Δβ> ±0.2) in methylation level between Responders and Non-Responders. Two genes, RHOJ (Ras Homolog Family Member J) and OR2L13 (Olfactory Receptor family 2 subfamily L member 13), presented more than one significant CpG sites. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the complex phenotype of antidepressant response, indicating that methylation at specific genes could be a promising biomarker that needs further replication in large cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8064712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80647122021-04-26 DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results Martinez-Pinteño, Albert Rodriguez, Natalia Blázquez, Ana Plana, Maria Teresa Varela, Eva Gassó, Patricia Lafuente, Amalia Lazaro, Luisa Mas, Sergi Pharmgenomics Pers Med Original Research PURPOSE: The search for predictors of antidepressant response is gaining increasing attention, with epigenetic markers attracting a great deal of interest. We performed a genome-wide study assessing baseline differences in DNA methylation between Responders and Non-Responders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two children and adolescents, receiving fluoxetine treatment for the first time, were classified as Responders or Non-Responders according to CGI-I score after 8 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. Genome-wide DNA methylation was profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip Kit and analyzed using the Chip Analysis Methylation Pipeline (ChAMP). RESULTS: We identified 21 CpG sites significantly (FDR<0.05) associated with fluoxetine response that showed meaningful differences (Δβ> ±0.2) in methylation level between Responders and Non-Responders. Two genes, RHOJ (Ras Homolog Family Member J) and OR2L13 (Olfactory Receptor family 2 subfamily L member 13), presented more than one significant CpG sites. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the complex phenotype of antidepressant response, indicating that methylation at specific genes could be a promising biomarker that needs further replication in large cohorts. Dove 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8064712/ /pubmed/33907441 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S289480 Text en © 2021 Martinez-Pinteño et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Martinez-Pinteño, Albert
Rodriguez, Natalia
Blázquez, Ana
Plana, Maria Teresa
Varela, Eva
Gassó, Patricia
Lafuente, Amalia
Lazaro, Luisa
Mas, Sergi
DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results
title DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results
title_full DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results
title_fullStr DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results
title_full_unstemmed DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results
title_short DNA Methylation of Fluoxetine Response in Child and Adolescence: Preliminary Results
title_sort dna methylation of fluoxetine response in child and adolescence: preliminary results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907441
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PGPM.S289480
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezpintenoalbert dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT rodrigueznatalia dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT blazquezana dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT planamariateresa dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT varelaeva dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT gassopatricia dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT lafuenteamalia dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT lazaroluisa dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults
AT massergi dnamethylationoffluoxetineresponseinchildandadolescencepreliminaryresults