Cargando…

Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Zolbetuximab plus first-line EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; ZOL/EOX) significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in the FAST trial vs EOX alone. We report the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of FAST in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adeno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lordick, Florian, Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin, Ganguli, Arijit, Morlock, Robert, Sahin, Ugur, Türeci, Özlem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33755863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01153-6
_version_ 1783682249099575296
author Lordick, Florian
Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin
Ganguli, Arijit
Morlock, Robert
Sahin, Ugur
Türeci, Özlem
author_facet Lordick, Florian
Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin
Ganguli, Arijit
Morlock, Robert
Sahin, Ugur
Türeci, Özlem
author_sort Lordick, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Zolbetuximab plus first-line EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; ZOL/EOX) significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in the FAST trial vs EOX alone. We report the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of FAST in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients were randomized to ZOL/EOX or EOX alone. Patients could receive ≤ 8 EOX cycles and remained on zolbetuximab until disease progression. PROs were collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 before drug administration at day 1/cycle 1, day 1/cycle 5, end of EOX treatment, and q12w thereafter until disease progression. Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as the first meaningful worsening from baseline, in the individual QLQ-C30/QLQ-STO22 scores was analyzed. Longitudinal changes in scores from baseline were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). RESULTS: The per protocol population included 143 (ZOL/EOX: 69; EOX: 74) patients. Baseline QLQ-C30 and STO22 scores were comparable between arms and denoted intermediate-to-high quality of life (QoL), intermediate-to-low global health status (GHS) and low symptom burden. Descriptive analyses showed no differences between arms until end of EOX but maintenance therapy with zolbetuximab was associated with better QoL and less symptom burden thereafter. TTD for most scores favored ZOL/EOX over EOX and reached statistical significance for GHS (p = 0.008). MMRM results support TTD findings; no statistically significant differences were observed between arms in any score except for nausea and vomiting (p = 0.0181 favoring EOX). CONCLUSIONS: ZOL/EOX allowed patients to maintain good QoL and low symptom burden for longer than EOX alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-020-01153-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8064997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80649972021-05-05 Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma Lordick, Florian Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin Ganguli, Arijit Morlock, Robert Sahin, Ugur Türeci, Özlem Gastric Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Zolbetuximab plus first-line EOX (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; ZOL/EOX) significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in the FAST trial vs EOX alone. We report the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of FAST in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients were randomized to ZOL/EOX or EOX alone. Patients could receive ≤ 8 EOX cycles and remained on zolbetuximab until disease progression. PROs were collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 before drug administration at day 1/cycle 1, day 1/cycle 5, end of EOX treatment, and q12w thereafter until disease progression. Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as the first meaningful worsening from baseline, in the individual QLQ-C30/QLQ-STO22 scores was analyzed. Longitudinal changes in scores from baseline were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). RESULTS: The per protocol population included 143 (ZOL/EOX: 69; EOX: 74) patients. Baseline QLQ-C30 and STO22 scores were comparable between arms and denoted intermediate-to-high quality of life (QoL), intermediate-to-low global health status (GHS) and low symptom burden. Descriptive analyses showed no differences between arms until end of EOX but maintenance therapy with zolbetuximab was associated with better QoL and less symptom burden thereafter. TTD for most scores favored ZOL/EOX over EOX and reached statistical significance for GHS (p = 0.008). MMRM results support TTD findings; no statistically significant differences were observed between arms in any score except for nausea and vomiting (p = 0.0181 favoring EOX). CONCLUSIONS: ZOL/EOX allowed patients to maintain good QoL and low symptom burden for longer than EOX alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-020-01153-6. Springer Singapore 2021-03-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8064997/ /pubmed/33755863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01153-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lordick, Florian
Al-Batran, Salah-Eddin
Ganguli, Arijit
Morlock, Robert
Sahin, Ugur
Türeci, Özlem
Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_short Patient-reported outcomes from the phase II FAST trial of zolbetuximab plus EOX compared to EOX alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CLDN18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
title_sort patient-reported outcomes from the phase ii fast trial of zolbetuximab plus eox compared to eox alone as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic cldn18.2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8064997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33755863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01153-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lordickflorian patientreportedoutcomesfromthephaseiifasttrialofzolbetuximabpluseoxcomparedtoeoxaloneasfirstlinetreatmentofpatientswithmetastaticcldn182gastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT albatransalaheddin patientreportedoutcomesfromthephaseiifasttrialofzolbetuximabpluseoxcomparedtoeoxaloneasfirstlinetreatmentofpatientswithmetastaticcldn182gastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT ganguliarijit patientreportedoutcomesfromthephaseiifasttrialofzolbetuximabpluseoxcomparedtoeoxaloneasfirstlinetreatmentofpatientswithmetastaticcldn182gastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT morlockrobert patientreportedoutcomesfromthephaseiifasttrialofzolbetuximabpluseoxcomparedtoeoxaloneasfirstlinetreatmentofpatientswithmetastaticcldn182gastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT sahinugur patientreportedoutcomesfromthephaseiifasttrialofzolbetuximabpluseoxcomparedtoeoxaloneasfirstlinetreatmentofpatientswithmetastaticcldn182gastroesophagealadenocarcinoma
AT tureciozlem patientreportedoutcomesfromthephaseiifasttrialofzolbetuximabpluseoxcomparedtoeoxaloneasfirstlinetreatmentofpatientswithmetastaticcldn182gastroesophagealadenocarcinoma