Cargando…
Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2 |
_version_ | 1783682250282369024 |
---|---|
author | Mommersteeg, Michiel C. Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V. den Hollander, Wouter J. Holster, Lisanne den Hoed, Caroline M. Capelle, Lisette G. Tang, Tjon J. Anten, Marie- Paule Prytz-Berset, Ingrid Witteman, Ellen M. ter Borg, Frank Burger, Jordy P. W. Doukas, Michail Bruno, Marco J. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Fuhler, Gwenny M. Kuipers, Ernst J. Spaander, Manon C. W. |
author_facet | Mommersteeg, Michiel C. Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V. den Hollander, Wouter J. Holster, Lisanne den Hoed, Caroline M. Capelle, Lisette G. Tang, Tjon J. Anten, Marie- Paule Prytz-Berset, Ingrid Witteman, Ellen M. ter Borg, Frank Burger, Jordy P. W. Doukas, Michail Bruno, Marco J. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Fuhler, Gwenny M. Kuipers, Ernst J. Spaander, Manon C. W. |
author_sort | Mommersteeg, Michiel C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk patients, who can safely be discharged from surveillance. METHODS: This study includes patients with GPL. Patients underwent at least two endoscopies with an interval of 1–6 years. Patients were defined ‘low risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for discharge, and ‘high risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for surveillance, according to European guidelines (MAPS-2012, updated MAPS-2019, BSG). Patients defined ‘low risk’ with progression of disease during follow-up (FU) were considered ‘misclassified’ as low risk. RESULTS: 334 patients (median age 60 years IQR11; 48.7% male) were included and followed for a median of 48 months. At baseline, 181/334 (54%) patients were defined low risk. Of these, 32.6% were ‘misclassified’, showing progression of disease during FU. If MAPS-2019 were followed, 169/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.5% were ‘misclassified’. If BSG were followed, 174/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.2% were ‘misclassified’. Seven patients developed gastric cancer (GC) or dysplasia, four patients were ‘misclassified’ based on MAPS-2012 and three on MAPS-2019 and BSG. By performing one additional endoscopy 72.9% (95% CI 62.4–83.3) of high-risk patients and all patients who developed GC or dysplasia were identified. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients that would have been discharged from GC surveillance, appeared to be ‘misclassified’ as low risk. One additional endoscopy will reduce this risk by 70%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8065002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80650022021-05-05 Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance Mommersteeg, Michiel C. Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V. den Hollander, Wouter J. Holster, Lisanne den Hoed, Caroline M. Capelle, Lisette G. Tang, Tjon J. Anten, Marie- Paule Prytz-Berset, Ingrid Witteman, Ellen M. ter Borg, Frank Burger, Jordy P. W. Doukas, Michail Bruno, Marco J. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Fuhler, Gwenny M. Kuipers, Ernst J. Spaander, Manon C. W. Gastric Cancer Original Article INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk patients, who can safely be discharged from surveillance. METHODS: This study includes patients with GPL. Patients underwent at least two endoscopies with an interval of 1–6 years. Patients were defined ‘low risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for discharge, and ‘high risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for surveillance, according to European guidelines (MAPS-2012, updated MAPS-2019, BSG). Patients defined ‘low risk’ with progression of disease during follow-up (FU) were considered ‘misclassified’ as low risk. RESULTS: 334 patients (median age 60 years IQR11; 48.7% male) were included and followed for a median of 48 months. At baseline, 181/334 (54%) patients were defined low risk. Of these, 32.6% were ‘misclassified’, showing progression of disease during FU. If MAPS-2019 were followed, 169/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.5% were ‘misclassified’. If BSG were followed, 174/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.2% were ‘misclassified’. Seven patients developed gastric cancer (GC) or dysplasia, four patients were ‘misclassified’ based on MAPS-2012 and three on MAPS-2019 and BSG. By performing one additional endoscopy 72.9% (95% CI 62.4–83.3) of high-risk patients and all patients who developed GC or dysplasia were identified. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients that would have been discharged from GC surveillance, appeared to be ‘misclassified’ as low risk. One additional endoscopy will reduce this risk by 70%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2. Springer Singapore 2021-02-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8065002/ /pubmed/33616776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mommersteeg, Michiel C. Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V. den Hollander, Wouter J. Holster, Lisanne den Hoed, Caroline M. Capelle, Lisette G. Tang, Tjon J. Anten, Marie- Paule Prytz-Berset, Ingrid Witteman, Ellen M. ter Borg, Frank Burger, Jordy P. W. Doukas, Michail Bruno, Marco J. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Fuhler, Gwenny M. Kuipers, Ernst J. Spaander, Manon C. W. Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
title | Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
title_full | Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
title_short | Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
title_sort | accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mommersteegmichielc accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT nieuwenburgstellaav accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT denhollanderwouterj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT holsterlisanne accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT denhoedcarolinem accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT capellelisetteg accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT tangtjonj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT antenmariepaule accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT prytzbersetingrid accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT wittemanellenm accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT terborgfrank accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT burgerjordypw accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT doukasmichail accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT brunomarcoj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT peppelenboschmaikelp accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT fuhlergwennym accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT kuipersernstj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance AT spaandermanoncw accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance |