Cargando…

Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mommersteeg, Michiel C., Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V., den Hollander, Wouter J., Holster, Lisanne, den Hoed, Caroline M., Capelle, Lisette G., Tang, Tjon J., Anten, Marie- Paule, Prytz-Berset, Ingrid, Witteman, Ellen M., ter Borg, Frank, Burger, Jordy P. W., Doukas, Michail, Bruno, Marco J., Peppelenbosch, Maikel P., Fuhler, Gwenny M., Kuipers, Ernst J., Spaander, Manon C. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2
_version_ 1783682250282369024
author Mommersteeg, Michiel C.
Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V.
den Hollander, Wouter J.
Holster, Lisanne
den Hoed, Caroline M.
Capelle, Lisette G.
Tang, Tjon J.
Anten, Marie- Paule
Prytz-Berset, Ingrid
Witteman, Ellen M.
ter Borg, Frank
Burger, Jordy P. W.
Doukas, Michail
Bruno, Marco J.
Peppelenbosch, Maikel P.
Fuhler, Gwenny M.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
author_facet Mommersteeg, Michiel C.
Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V.
den Hollander, Wouter J.
Holster, Lisanne
den Hoed, Caroline M.
Capelle, Lisette G.
Tang, Tjon J.
Anten, Marie- Paule
Prytz-Berset, Ingrid
Witteman, Ellen M.
ter Borg, Frank
Burger, Jordy P. W.
Doukas, Michail
Bruno, Marco J.
Peppelenbosch, Maikel P.
Fuhler, Gwenny M.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
author_sort Mommersteeg, Michiel C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk patients, who can safely be discharged from surveillance. METHODS: This study includes patients with GPL. Patients underwent at least two endoscopies with an interval of 1–6 years. Patients were defined ‘low risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for discharge, and ‘high risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for surveillance, according to European guidelines (MAPS-2012, updated MAPS-2019, BSG). Patients defined ‘low risk’ with progression of disease during follow-up (FU) were considered ‘misclassified’ as low risk. RESULTS: 334 patients (median age 60 years IQR11; 48.7% male) were included and followed for a median of 48 months. At baseline, 181/334 (54%) patients were defined low risk. Of these, 32.6% were ‘misclassified’, showing progression of disease during FU. If MAPS-2019 were followed, 169/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.5% were ‘misclassified’. If BSG were followed, 174/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.2% were ‘misclassified’. Seven patients developed gastric cancer (GC) or dysplasia, four patients were ‘misclassified’ based on MAPS-2012 and three on MAPS-2019 and BSG. By performing one additional endoscopy 72.9% (95% CI 62.4–83.3) of high-risk patients and all patients who developed GC or dysplasia were identified. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients that would have been discharged from GC surveillance, appeared to be ‘misclassified’ as low risk. One additional endoscopy will reduce this risk by 70%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8065002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80650022021-05-05 Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance Mommersteeg, Michiel C. Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V. den Hollander, Wouter J. Holster, Lisanne den Hoed, Caroline M. Capelle, Lisette G. Tang, Tjon J. Anten, Marie- Paule Prytz-Berset, Ingrid Witteman, Ellen M. ter Borg, Frank Burger, Jordy P. W. Doukas, Michail Bruno, Marco J. Peppelenbosch, Maikel P. Fuhler, Gwenny M. Kuipers, Ernst J. Spaander, Manon C. W. Gastric Cancer Original Article INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk patients, who can safely be discharged from surveillance. METHODS: This study includes patients with GPL. Patients underwent at least two endoscopies with an interval of 1–6 years. Patients were defined ‘low risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for discharge, and ‘high risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for surveillance, according to European guidelines (MAPS-2012, updated MAPS-2019, BSG). Patients defined ‘low risk’ with progression of disease during follow-up (FU) were considered ‘misclassified’ as low risk. RESULTS: 334 patients (median age 60 years IQR11; 48.7% male) were included and followed for a median of 48 months. At baseline, 181/334 (54%) patients were defined low risk. Of these, 32.6% were ‘misclassified’, showing progression of disease during FU. If MAPS-2019 were followed, 169/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.5% were ‘misclassified’. If BSG were followed, 174/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.2% were ‘misclassified’. Seven patients developed gastric cancer (GC) or dysplasia, four patients were ‘misclassified’ based on MAPS-2012 and three on MAPS-2019 and BSG. By performing one additional endoscopy 72.9% (95% CI 62.4–83.3) of high-risk patients and all patients who developed GC or dysplasia were identified. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients that would have been discharged from GC surveillance, appeared to be ‘misclassified’ as low risk. One additional endoscopy will reduce this risk by 70%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2. Springer Singapore 2021-02-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8065002/ /pubmed/33616776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Mommersteeg, Michiel C.
Nieuwenburg, Stella A. V.
den Hollander, Wouter J.
Holster, Lisanne
den Hoed, Caroline M.
Capelle, Lisette G.
Tang, Tjon J.
Anten, Marie- Paule
Prytz-Berset, Ingrid
Witteman, Ellen M.
ter Borg, Frank
Burger, Jordy P. W.
Doukas, Michail
Bruno, Marco J.
Peppelenbosch, Maikel P.
Fuhler, Gwenny M.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
title Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
title_full Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
title_fullStr Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
title_short Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
title_sort accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01149-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mommersteegmichielc accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT nieuwenburgstellaav accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT denhollanderwouterj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT holsterlisanne accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT denhoedcarolinem accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT capellelisetteg accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT tangtjonj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT antenmariepaule accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT prytzbersetingrid accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT wittemanellenm accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT terborgfrank accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT burgerjordypw accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT doukasmichail accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT brunomarcoj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT peppelenboschmaikelp accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT fuhlergwennym accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT kuipersernstj accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance
AT spaandermanoncw accuracyofupperendoscopieswithrandombiopsiestoidentifypatientswithgastricpremalignantlesionswhocansafelybeexemptfromsurveillance