Cargando…
Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
Objective: In our study, we aim to evaluate in terms of patients the quality and reliability of the most relevant and most-watched videos uploaded on YouTube about pancreatic cancer. Method: Before starting the study, YouTube(TM) search terms were determined by consensus by two General Surgeons. The...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907636 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14085 |
_version_ | 1783682266316144640 |
---|---|
author | Cakmak, Guner Mantoglu, Baris |
author_facet | Cakmak, Guner Mantoglu, Baris |
author_sort | Cakmak, Guner |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: In our study, we aim to evaluate in terms of patients the quality and reliability of the most relevant and most-watched videos uploaded on YouTube about pancreatic cancer. Method: Before starting the study, YouTube(TM) search terms were determined by consensus by two General Surgeons. Then, on 10/10/2020, the terms such as “pancreatic cancer”, “diagnosis of pancreatic cancer” and “treatment of pancreatic cancer” were entered separately in the search bar of YouTube, “relevance” was selected among the filtering options and the most viewed videos were listed. The videos were evaluated with the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the DISCERN scoring system (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information, http://www.discern.org.uk), and video power index. Results: Among the 50 videos analysed, 19 videos were uploaded by hospital channels, 17 videos by health channels, seven videos by patients, four videos by blog channels, and three videos by doctors. The mean GQS score of the first researcher was 3.24 ± 0.99 and the mean GQS score of the second researcher was 3.18 ± 0.88 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.628). The mean DISCERN score of the first researcher was 3.48 ± 0.77 and the mean DISCERN score of the second researcher was 3.46 ± 1.09 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.814). Conclusion: In our study, the majority of the videos were found to be of moderate quality. Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to upload more videos with useful content. However, we think that the uploaded videos should definitely go through a professional peer-review process before they are published. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8065091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80650912021-04-26 Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer Cakmak, Guner Mantoglu, Baris Cureus General Surgery Objective: In our study, we aim to evaluate in terms of patients the quality and reliability of the most relevant and most-watched videos uploaded on YouTube about pancreatic cancer. Method: Before starting the study, YouTube(TM) search terms were determined by consensus by two General Surgeons. Then, on 10/10/2020, the terms such as “pancreatic cancer”, “diagnosis of pancreatic cancer” and “treatment of pancreatic cancer” were entered separately in the search bar of YouTube, “relevance” was selected among the filtering options and the most viewed videos were listed. The videos were evaluated with the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the DISCERN scoring system (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information, http://www.discern.org.uk), and video power index. Results: Among the 50 videos analysed, 19 videos were uploaded by hospital channels, 17 videos by health channels, seven videos by patients, four videos by blog channels, and three videos by doctors. The mean GQS score of the first researcher was 3.24 ± 0.99 and the mean GQS score of the second researcher was 3.18 ± 0.88 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.628). The mean DISCERN score of the first researcher was 3.48 ± 0.77 and the mean DISCERN score of the second researcher was 3.46 ± 1.09 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.814). Conclusion: In our study, the majority of the videos were found to be of moderate quality. Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to upload more videos with useful content. However, we think that the uploaded videos should definitely go through a professional peer-review process before they are published. Cureus 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8065091/ /pubmed/33907636 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14085 Text en Copyright © 2021, Cakmak et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Cakmak, Guner Mantoglu, Baris Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer |
title | Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer |
title_full | Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer |
title_short | Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer |
title_sort | reliability and quality of youtube contents pertaining to pancreatic cancer |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907636 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cakmakguner reliabilityandqualityofyoutubecontentspertainingtopancreaticcancer AT mantoglubaris reliabilityandqualityofyoutubecontentspertainingtopancreaticcancer |