Cargando…

Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer

Objective: In our study, we aim to evaluate in terms of patients the quality and reliability of the most relevant and most-watched videos uploaded on YouTube about pancreatic cancer. Method: Before starting the study, YouTube(TM) search terms were determined by consensus by two General Surgeons. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cakmak, Guner, Mantoglu, Baris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907636
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14085
_version_ 1783682266316144640
author Cakmak, Guner
Mantoglu, Baris
author_facet Cakmak, Guner
Mantoglu, Baris
author_sort Cakmak, Guner
collection PubMed
description Objective: In our study, we aim to evaluate in terms of patients the quality and reliability of the most relevant and most-watched videos uploaded on YouTube about pancreatic cancer. Method: Before starting the study, YouTube(TM) search terms were determined by consensus by two General Surgeons. Then, on 10/10/2020, the terms such as “pancreatic cancer”, “diagnosis of pancreatic cancer” and “treatment of pancreatic cancer” were entered separately in the search bar of YouTube, “relevance” was selected among the filtering options and the most viewed videos were listed. The videos were evaluated with the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the DISCERN scoring system (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information, http://www.discern.org.uk), and video power index. Results: Among the 50 videos analysed, 19 videos were uploaded by hospital channels, 17 videos by health channels, seven videos by patients, four videos by blog channels, and three videos by doctors. The mean GQS score of the first researcher was 3.24 ± 0.99 and the mean GQS score of the second researcher was 3.18 ± 0.88 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.628). The mean DISCERN score of the first researcher was 3.48 ± 0.77 and the mean DISCERN score of the second researcher was 3.46 ± 1.09 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.814). Conclusion: In our study, the majority of the videos were found to be of moderate quality. Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to upload more videos with useful content. However, we think that the uploaded videos should definitely go through a professional peer-review process before they are published.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8065091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80650912021-04-26 Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer Cakmak, Guner Mantoglu, Baris Cureus General Surgery Objective: In our study, we aim to evaluate in terms of patients the quality and reliability of the most relevant and most-watched videos uploaded on YouTube about pancreatic cancer. Method: Before starting the study, YouTube(TM) search terms were determined by consensus by two General Surgeons. Then, on 10/10/2020, the terms such as “pancreatic cancer”, “diagnosis of pancreatic cancer” and “treatment of pancreatic cancer” were entered separately in the search bar of YouTube, “relevance” was selected among the filtering options and the most viewed videos were listed. The videos were evaluated with the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the DISCERN scoring system (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information, http://www.discern.org.uk), and video power index. Results: Among the 50 videos analysed, 19 videos were uploaded by hospital channels, 17 videos by health channels, seven videos by patients, four videos by blog channels, and three videos by doctors. The mean GQS score of the first researcher was 3.24 ± 0.99 and the mean GQS score of the second researcher was 3.18 ± 0.88 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.628). The mean DISCERN score of the first researcher was 3.48 ± 0.77 and the mean DISCERN score of the second researcher was 3.46 ± 1.09 with a significantly high agreement between them (r= 0.814). Conclusion: In our study, the majority of the videos were found to be of moderate quality. Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to upload more videos with useful content. However, we think that the uploaded videos should definitely go through a professional peer-review process before they are published. Cureus 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8065091/ /pubmed/33907636 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14085 Text en Copyright © 2021, Cakmak et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Cakmak, Guner
Mantoglu, Baris
Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
title Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
title_full Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
title_fullStr Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
title_short Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer
title_sort reliability and quality of youtube contents pertaining to pancreatic cancer
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33907636
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14085
work_keys_str_mv AT cakmakguner reliabilityandqualityofyoutubecontentspertainingtopancreaticcancer
AT mantoglubaris reliabilityandqualityofyoutubecontentspertainingtopancreaticcancer