Cargando…

Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non-commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. This apparent contradiction t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadin, Benjamin, Fadel, Matteo, Gessner, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3
_version_ 1783682281904275456
author Yadin, Benjamin
Fadel, Matteo
Gessner, Manuel
author_facet Yadin, Benjamin
Fadel, Matteo
Gessner, Manuel
author_sort Yadin, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non-commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. This apparent contradiction to complementarity is made possible by nonclassical correlations stronger than entanglement, called steering. Quantum information recognises steering as an essential resource for a number of tasks but, contrary to entanglement, its role for metrology has so far remained unclear. Here, we formulate the EPR paradox in the framework of quantum metrology, showing that it enables the precise estimation of a local phase shift and of its generating observable. Employing a stricter formulation of quantum complementarity, we derive a criterion based on the quantum Fisher information that detects steering in a larger class of states than well-known uncertainty-based criteria. Our result identifies useful steering for quantum-enhanced precision measurements and allows one to uncover steering of non-Gaussian states in state-of-the-art experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8065158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80651582021-05-11 Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox Yadin, Benjamin Fadel, Matteo Gessner, Manuel Nat Commun Article The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non-commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. This apparent contradiction to complementarity is made possible by nonclassical correlations stronger than entanglement, called steering. Quantum information recognises steering as an essential resource for a number of tasks but, contrary to entanglement, its role for metrology has so far remained unclear. Here, we formulate the EPR paradox in the framework of quantum metrology, showing that it enables the precise estimation of a local phase shift and of its generating observable. Employing a stricter formulation of quantum complementarity, we derive a criterion based on the quantum Fisher information that detects steering in a larger class of states than well-known uncertainty-based criteria. Our result identifies useful steering for quantum-enhanced precision measurements and allows one to uncover steering of non-Gaussian states in state-of-the-art experiments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8065158/ /pubmed/33893281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Yadin, Benjamin
Fadel, Matteo
Gessner, Manuel
Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
title Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
title_full Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
title_fullStr Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
title_full_unstemmed Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
title_short Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
title_sort metrological complementarity reveals the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yadinbenjamin metrologicalcomplementarityrevealstheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox
AT fadelmatteo metrologicalcomplementarityrevealstheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox
AT gessnermanuel metrologicalcomplementarityrevealstheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox