Cargando…
Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non-commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. This apparent contradiction t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3 |
_version_ | 1783682281904275456 |
---|---|
author | Yadin, Benjamin Fadel, Matteo Gessner, Manuel |
author_facet | Yadin, Benjamin Fadel, Matteo Gessner, Manuel |
author_sort | Yadin, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non-commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. This apparent contradiction to complementarity is made possible by nonclassical correlations stronger than entanglement, called steering. Quantum information recognises steering as an essential resource for a number of tasks but, contrary to entanglement, its role for metrology has so far remained unclear. Here, we formulate the EPR paradox in the framework of quantum metrology, showing that it enables the precise estimation of a local phase shift and of its generating observable. Employing a stricter formulation of quantum complementarity, we derive a criterion based on the quantum Fisher information that detects steering in a larger class of states than well-known uncertainty-based criteria. Our result identifies useful steering for quantum-enhanced precision measurements and allows one to uncover steering of non-Gaussian states in state-of-the-art experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8065158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80651582021-05-11 Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox Yadin, Benjamin Fadel, Matteo Gessner, Manuel Nat Commun Article The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox plays a fundamental role in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and is associated with the possibility of predicting the results of non-commuting measurements with a precision that seems to violate the uncertainty principle. This apparent contradiction to complementarity is made possible by nonclassical correlations stronger than entanglement, called steering. Quantum information recognises steering as an essential resource for a number of tasks but, contrary to entanglement, its role for metrology has so far remained unclear. Here, we formulate the EPR paradox in the framework of quantum metrology, showing that it enables the precise estimation of a local phase shift and of its generating observable. Employing a stricter formulation of quantum complementarity, we derive a criterion based on the quantum Fisher information that detects steering in a larger class of states than well-known uncertainty-based criteria. Our result identifies useful steering for quantum-enhanced precision measurements and allows one to uncover steering of non-Gaussian states in state-of-the-art experiments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8065158/ /pubmed/33893281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yadin, Benjamin Fadel, Matteo Gessner, Manuel Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox |
title | Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox |
title_full | Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox |
title_fullStr | Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox |
title_full_unstemmed | Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox |
title_short | Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox |
title_sort | metrological complementarity reveals the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33893281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22353-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yadinbenjamin metrologicalcomplementarityrevealstheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox AT fadelmatteo metrologicalcomplementarityrevealstheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox AT gessnermanuel metrologicalcomplementarityrevealstheeinsteinpodolskyrosenparadox |