Cargando…

A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions

Background and Objectives: The real impact of ionizing radiation on the heart and poorer overall survival for patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study aims to determine the safe dose constraints to the heart’s subregions that could prevent patients’ early non-canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steponavičienė, Rita, Jonušas, Justinas, Griškevičius, Romualdas, Venius, Jonas, Cicėnas, Saulius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57040320
_version_ 1783682332130017280
author Steponavičienė, Rita
Jonušas, Justinas
Griškevičius, Romualdas
Venius, Jonas
Cicėnas, Saulius
author_facet Steponavičienė, Rita
Jonušas, Justinas
Griškevičius, Romualdas
Venius, Jonas
Cicėnas, Saulius
author_sort Steponavičienė, Rita
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The real impact of ionizing radiation on the heart and poorer overall survival for patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study aims to determine the safe dose constraints to the heart’s subregions that could prevent patients’ early non-cancerous death and improve their quality of life. Methods and Materials: A retrospective cohort study was performed containing 51 consecutive patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC and treated using 3D, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy. For a dosimetric analysis, these structures were chosen: heart, heart base (HB), and region of great blood vessels (GBV). Dose–volume histograms (DVH) were recorded for all mentioned structures. Maximum and mean doses to the heart, HB, the muscle mass of the HB, and GBV were obtained. V10–V60 (%) parameters were calculated from the DVH. After performed statistical analysis, logistic regression models were created, and critical doses calculated. Results: The critical dose for developing a fatal endpoint for HB was 30.5 Gy, while for GBV, it was 46.3 Gy. Increasing the average dose to the HB or GBV by 1 Gy from the critical dose further increases the possibility of early death by 22.0% and 15.8%, respectively. Conclusions: We suggest that the non-canonical sub-regions of the heart (HB and GBV) should be considered during the planning stage. Additional constraints of the heart subregions should be chosen accordingly, and we propose that the mean doses to these regions be 30.5 Gy and 46.3 Gy, respectively, or less. Extrapolated DVH curves for both regions may be used during the planning stage with care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8065397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80653972021-04-25 A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions Steponavičienė, Rita Jonušas, Justinas Griškevičius, Romualdas Venius, Jonas Cicėnas, Saulius Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The real impact of ionizing radiation on the heart and poorer overall survival for patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study aims to determine the safe dose constraints to the heart’s subregions that could prevent patients’ early non-cancerous death and improve their quality of life. Methods and Materials: A retrospective cohort study was performed containing 51 consecutive patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC and treated using 3D, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiotherapy. For a dosimetric analysis, these structures were chosen: heart, heart base (HB), and region of great blood vessels (GBV). Dose–volume histograms (DVH) were recorded for all mentioned structures. Maximum and mean doses to the heart, HB, the muscle mass of the HB, and GBV were obtained. V10–V60 (%) parameters were calculated from the DVH. After performed statistical analysis, logistic regression models were created, and critical doses calculated. Results: The critical dose for developing a fatal endpoint for HB was 30.5 Gy, while for GBV, it was 46.3 Gy. Increasing the average dose to the HB or GBV by 1 Gy from the critical dose further increases the possibility of early death by 22.0% and 15.8%, respectively. Conclusions: We suggest that the non-canonical sub-regions of the heart (HB and GBV) should be considered during the planning stage. Additional constraints of the heart subregions should be chosen accordingly, and we propose that the mean doses to these regions be 30.5 Gy and 46.3 Gy, respectively, or less. Extrapolated DVH curves for both regions may be used during the planning stage with care. MDPI 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8065397/ /pubmed/33807209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57040320 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Steponavičienė, Rita
Jonušas, Justinas
Griškevičius, Romualdas
Venius, Jonas
Cicėnas, Saulius
A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions
title A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions
title_full A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions
title_fullStr A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions
title_short A Pilot Study of Safer Radiation Dosage to the Heart and Its Subregions
title_sort pilot study of safer radiation dosage to the heart and its subregions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57040320
work_keys_str_mv AT steponavicienerita apilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT jonusasjustinas apilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT griskeviciusromualdas apilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT veniusjonas apilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT cicenassaulius apilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT steponavicienerita pilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT jonusasjustinas pilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT griskeviciusromualdas pilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT veniusjonas pilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions
AT cicenassaulius pilotstudyofsaferradiationdosagetotheheartanditssubregions