Cargando…

Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project

Variability in neonatal clinical practice is well recognized. Respiratory management involves interdisciplinary care and often is protocol driven. The most recent published guidelines for management of respiratory distress syndrome and surfactant administration were published in 2014 and may not ref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Priya, Houck, Andrew, Fuentes, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800603
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8040261
_version_ 1783682413447086080
author Patel, Priya
Houck, Andrew
Fuentes, Daniel
author_facet Patel, Priya
Houck, Andrew
Fuentes, Daniel
author_sort Patel, Priya
collection PubMed
description Variability in neonatal clinical practice is well recognized. Respiratory management involves interdisciplinary care and often is protocol driven. The most recent published guidelines for management of respiratory distress syndrome and surfactant administration were published in 2014 and may not reflect current clinical practice in the United States. The goal of this project was to better understand variability in surfactant administration through conduct of health care provider (HCP) interviews. Questions focused on known practice variations included: use of premedication, decisions to treat, technique of surfactant administration and use of guidelines. Data were analyzed for trends and results were communicated with participants. A total of 54 HCPs participated from June to September 2020. In almost all settings, neonatologists or nurse practitioners intubated the infant and respiratory therapists administered surfactant. The INSURE (INtubation-SURrfactant-Extubation) technique was practiced by 83% of participants. Premedication prior to intubation was used by 76% of HCPs. An FiO(2) ≥ 30% was the most common threshold for surfactant administration (48%). In conclusion, clinical practice variations exist in respiratory management and surfactant administration and do not seem to be specific to NICU level or institution type. It is unknown what effects the variability in clinical practice might have on clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8065748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80657482021-04-25 Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project Patel, Priya Houck, Andrew Fuentes, Daniel Children (Basel) Article Variability in neonatal clinical practice is well recognized. Respiratory management involves interdisciplinary care and often is protocol driven. The most recent published guidelines for management of respiratory distress syndrome and surfactant administration were published in 2014 and may not reflect current clinical practice in the United States. The goal of this project was to better understand variability in surfactant administration through conduct of health care provider (HCP) interviews. Questions focused on known practice variations included: use of premedication, decisions to treat, technique of surfactant administration and use of guidelines. Data were analyzed for trends and results were communicated with participants. A total of 54 HCPs participated from June to September 2020. In almost all settings, neonatologists or nurse practitioners intubated the infant and respiratory therapists administered surfactant. The INSURE (INtubation-SURrfactant-Extubation) technique was practiced by 83% of participants. Premedication prior to intubation was used by 76% of HCPs. An FiO(2) ≥ 30% was the most common threshold for surfactant administration (48%). In conclusion, clinical practice variations exist in respiratory management and surfactant administration and do not seem to be specific to NICU level or institution type. It is unknown what effects the variability in clinical practice might have on clinical outcomes. MDPI 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8065748/ /pubmed/33800603 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8040261 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Patel, Priya
Houck, Andrew
Fuentes, Daniel
Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project
title Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project
title_full Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project
title_fullStr Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project
title_full_unstemmed Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project
title_short Examining Variations in Surfactant Administration (ENVISION): A Neonatology Insights Pilot Project
title_sort examining variations in surfactant administration (envision): a neonatology insights pilot project
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8065748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800603
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8040261
work_keys_str_mv AT patelpriya examiningvariationsinsurfactantadministrationenvisionaneonatologyinsightspilotproject
AT houckandrew examiningvariationsinsurfactantadministrationenvisionaneonatologyinsightspilotproject
AT fuentesdaniel examiningvariationsinsurfactantadministrationenvisionaneonatologyinsightspilotproject