Cargando…
Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
The natural hosts of Orthohantaviruses are rodents, soricomorphs and bats, and it is well known that they may cause serious or even fatal diseases among humans worldwide. The virus is persistent among animals and it is shed via urine, saliva and feces throughout the entirety of their lives. We aim t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13040570 |
_version_ | 1783682575327297536 |
---|---|
author | Madai, Mónika Horváth, Győző Herczeg, Róbert Somogyi, Balázs Zana, Brigitta Földes, Fanni Kemenesi, Gábor Kurucz, Kornélia Papp, Henrietta Zeghbib, Safia Jakab, Ferenc |
author_facet | Madai, Mónika Horváth, Győző Herczeg, Róbert Somogyi, Balázs Zana, Brigitta Földes, Fanni Kemenesi, Gábor Kurucz, Kornélia Papp, Henrietta Zeghbib, Safia Jakab, Ferenc |
author_sort | Madai, Mónika |
collection | PubMed |
description | The natural hosts of Orthohantaviruses are rodents, soricomorphs and bats, and it is well known that they may cause serious or even fatal diseases among humans worldwide. The virus is persistent among animals and it is shed via urine, saliva and feces throughout the entirety of their lives. We aim to identify the effectiveness of hantavirus detection in rodent tissue samples and urine originating from naturally infected rodents. Initially, animals were trapped at five distinct locations throughout the Transdanubian region in Hungary. Lung, liver, kidney and urine samples were obtained from 163 deceased animals. All organs and urine were tested using nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR). Furthermore, sera were examined for IgG antibodies against Dobrava–Belgrade virus (DOBV) and Puumala virus (PUUV) by Western blot assay. IgG antibodies against hantaviruses and/or nucleic acid were detected in 25 (15.3%) cases. Among Apodemus, Myodes, and Microtus rodent species, DOBV, PUUV and Tula virus (TULV) were clearly identified. Amid the PCR-positive samples, the nucleic acid of the viruses was detected most effectively in the kidney (100%), while only 55% of screened lung tissues were positive. Interestingly, only three out of 20 rodent urine samples were positive when tested using nRT-PCR. Moreover, five rodents were seropositive without detectable virus nucleic acid in any of the tested organs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8066454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80664542021-04-25 Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine Madai, Mónika Horváth, Győző Herczeg, Róbert Somogyi, Balázs Zana, Brigitta Földes, Fanni Kemenesi, Gábor Kurucz, Kornélia Papp, Henrietta Zeghbib, Safia Jakab, Ferenc Viruses Communication The natural hosts of Orthohantaviruses are rodents, soricomorphs and bats, and it is well known that they may cause serious or even fatal diseases among humans worldwide. The virus is persistent among animals and it is shed via urine, saliva and feces throughout the entirety of their lives. We aim to identify the effectiveness of hantavirus detection in rodent tissue samples and urine originating from naturally infected rodents. Initially, animals were trapped at five distinct locations throughout the Transdanubian region in Hungary. Lung, liver, kidney and urine samples were obtained from 163 deceased animals. All organs and urine were tested using nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR). Furthermore, sera were examined for IgG antibodies against Dobrava–Belgrade virus (DOBV) and Puumala virus (PUUV) by Western blot assay. IgG antibodies against hantaviruses and/or nucleic acid were detected in 25 (15.3%) cases. Among Apodemus, Myodes, and Microtus rodent species, DOBV, PUUV and Tula virus (TULV) were clearly identified. Amid the PCR-positive samples, the nucleic acid of the viruses was detected most effectively in the kidney (100%), while only 55% of screened lung tissues were positive. Interestingly, only three out of 20 rodent urine samples were positive when tested using nRT-PCR. Moreover, five rodents were seropositive without detectable virus nucleic acid in any of the tested organs. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8066454/ /pubmed/33805304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13040570 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Communication Madai, Mónika Horváth, Győző Herczeg, Róbert Somogyi, Balázs Zana, Brigitta Földes, Fanni Kemenesi, Gábor Kurucz, Kornélia Papp, Henrietta Zeghbib, Safia Jakab, Ferenc Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine |
title | Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine |
title_full | Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine |
title_short | Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine |
title_sort | effectiveness regarding hantavirus detection in rodent tissue samples and urine |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13040570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madaimonika effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT horvathgyozo effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT herczegrobert effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT somogyibalazs effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT zanabrigitta effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT foldesfanni effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT kemenesigabor effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT kuruczkornelia effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT papphenrietta effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT zeghbibsafia effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine AT jakabferenc effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine |