Cargando…

Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine

The natural hosts of Orthohantaviruses are rodents, soricomorphs and bats, and it is well known that they may cause serious or even fatal diseases among humans worldwide. The virus is persistent among animals and it is shed via urine, saliva and feces throughout the entirety of their lives. We aim t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madai, Mónika, Horváth, Győző, Herczeg, Róbert, Somogyi, Balázs, Zana, Brigitta, Földes, Fanni, Kemenesi, Gábor, Kurucz, Kornélia, Papp, Henrietta, Zeghbib, Safia, Jakab, Ferenc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13040570
_version_ 1783682575327297536
author Madai, Mónika
Horváth, Győző
Herczeg, Róbert
Somogyi, Balázs
Zana, Brigitta
Földes, Fanni
Kemenesi, Gábor
Kurucz, Kornélia
Papp, Henrietta
Zeghbib, Safia
Jakab, Ferenc
author_facet Madai, Mónika
Horváth, Győző
Herczeg, Róbert
Somogyi, Balázs
Zana, Brigitta
Földes, Fanni
Kemenesi, Gábor
Kurucz, Kornélia
Papp, Henrietta
Zeghbib, Safia
Jakab, Ferenc
author_sort Madai, Mónika
collection PubMed
description The natural hosts of Orthohantaviruses are rodents, soricomorphs and bats, and it is well known that they may cause serious or even fatal diseases among humans worldwide. The virus is persistent among animals and it is shed via urine, saliva and feces throughout the entirety of their lives. We aim to identify the effectiveness of hantavirus detection in rodent tissue samples and urine originating from naturally infected rodents. Initially, animals were trapped at five distinct locations throughout the Transdanubian region in Hungary. Lung, liver, kidney and urine samples were obtained from 163 deceased animals. All organs and urine were tested using nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR). Furthermore, sera were examined for IgG antibodies against Dobrava–Belgrade virus (DOBV) and Puumala virus (PUUV) by Western blot assay. IgG antibodies against hantaviruses and/or nucleic acid were detected in 25 (15.3%) cases. Among Apodemus, Myodes, and Microtus rodent species, DOBV, PUUV and Tula virus (TULV) were clearly identified. Amid the PCR-positive samples, the nucleic acid of the viruses was detected most effectively in the kidney (100%), while only 55% of screened lung tissues were positive. Interestingly, only three out of 20 rodent urine samples were positive when tested using nRT-PCR. Moreover, five rodents were seropositive without detectable virus nucleic acid in any of the tested organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8066454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80664542021-04-25 Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine Madai, Mónika Horváth, Győző Herczeg, Róbert Somogyi, Balázs Zana, Brigitta Földes, Fanni Kemenesi, Gábor Kurucz, Kornélia Papp, Henrietta Zeghbib, Safia Jakab, Ferenc Viruses Communication The natural hosts of Orthohantaviruses are rodents, soricomorphs and bats, and it is well known that they may cause serious or even fatal diseases among humans worldwide. The virus is persistent among animals and it is shed via urine, saliva and feces throughout the entirety of their lives. We aim to identify the effectiveness of hantavirus detection in rodent tissue samples and urine originating from naturally infected rodents. Initially, animals were trapped at five distinct locations throughout the Transdanubian region in Hungary. Lung, liver, kidney and urine samples were obtained from 163 deceased animals. All organs and urine were tested using nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (nRT-PCR). Furthermore, sera were examined for IgG antibodies against Dobrava–Belgrade virus (DOBV) and Puumala virus (PUUV) by Western blot assay. IgG antibodies against hantaviruses and/or nucleic acid were detected in 25 (15.3%) cases. Among Apodemus, Myodes, and Microtus rodent species, DOBV, PUUV and Tula virus (TULV) were clearly identified. Amid the PCR-positive samples, the nucleic acid of the viruses was detected most effectively in the kidney (100%), while only 55% of screened lung tissues were positive. Interestingly, only three out of 20 rodent urine samples were positive when tested using nRT-PCR. Moreover, five rodents were seropositive without detectable virus nucleic acid in any of the tested organs. MDPI 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8066454/ /pubmed/33805304 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13040570 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Communication
Madai, Mónika
Horváth, Győző
Herczeg, Róbert
Somogyi, Balázs
Zana, Brigitta
Földes, Fanni
Kemenesi, Gábor
Kurucz, Kornélia
Papp, Henrietta
Zeghbib, Safia
Jakab, Ferenc
Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
title Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
title_full Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
title_fullStr Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
title_short Effectiveness Regarding Hantavirus Detection in Rodent Tissue Samples and Urine
title_sort effectiveness regarding hantavirus detection in rodent tissue samples and urine
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33805304
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13040570
work_keys_str_mv AT madaimonika effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT horvathgyozo effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT herczegrobert effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT somogyibalazs effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT zanabrigitta effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT foldesfanni effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT kemenesigabor effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT kuruczkornelia effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT papphenrietta effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT zeghbibsafia effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine
AT jakabferenc effectivenessregardinghantavirusdetectioninrodenttissuesamplesandurine