Cargando…
Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo
Monitoring of infectious diseases is one of the most important pillars of preventive medicine in zoos. Screening for parasitic and bacterial infections is important to keep animals and equipment safe from pathogens that may pose a risk to animal and human health. Zoos usually contain many different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33916840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040428 |
_version_ | 1783682598736756736 |
---|---|
author | Kvapil, Pavel Račnik, Joško Kastelic, Marjan Marková, Jiřina Murat, Jean-Benjamin Kobédová, Kateřina Pittermannová, Pavlina Budíková, Marie Sedlák, Kamil Bártová, Eva |
author_facet | Kvapil, Pavel Račnik, Joško Kastelic, Marjan Marková, Jiřina Murat, Jean-Benjamin Kobédová, Kateřina Pittermannová, Pavlina Budíková, Marie Sedlák, Kamil Bártová, Eva |
author_sort | Kvapil, Pavel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Monitoring of infectious diseases is one of the most important pillars of preventive medicine in zoos. Screening for parasitic and bacterial infections is important to keep animals and equipment safe from pathogens that may pose a risk to animal and human health. Zoos usually contain many different animal species living in proximity with people and wild animals. As an epidemiological probe, 188 animals (122 mammals, 65 birds, and one reptile) from a zoo in Slovenia were examined for selected pathogens. Antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum were detected by ELISA in 38% (46/122) and 3% (4/122) of mammals, and in 0% (0/64) and 2% (1/57) of birds, respectively; the reptile (0/1) was negative. A statistically significant difference in T. gondii prevalence was found in Carnivora compared to Cetartiodactyla and primate antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi were detected by IFAT in 44% (52/118) of mammals and 20% (11/56) of birds, respectively; the reptile (0/1) was negative. Herbivores had a higher chance of being infected with E. cuniculi compared to omnivores. Antibodies to Chlamydia abortus and Coxiella burnetii were not detected in any of the 74 tested zoo animals. The sera of 39 wild rodents found in the zoo were also examined; they were negative for all three parasites. The parasite T. gondii was detected by PCR in the tissue of two mute swans (Cygnus olor), three eastern house mice (Mus musculus), one yellow-necked field mouse (Apodemus flavicollis), and one striped field mouse (A. agrarius). Positive samples were genotyped by a single multiplex PCR assay using 15 microsatellite markers; one sample from a mute swan was characterized as type II. This micro-epidemiological study offers a better understanding of pathogens in zoo animals and an understanding of the role of zoos in biosurveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8066565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80665652021-04-25 Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo Kvapil, Pavel Račnik, Joško Kastelic, Marjan Marková, Jiřina Murat, Jean-Benjamin Kobédová, Kateřina Pittermannová, Pavlina Budíková, Marie Sedlák, Kamil Bártová, Eva Pathogens Article Monitoring of infectious diseases is one of the most important pillars of preventive medicine in zoos. Screening for parasitic and bacterial infections is important to keep animals and equipment safe from pathogens that may pose a risk to animal and human health. Zoos usually contain many different animal species living in proximity with people and wild animals. As an epidemiological probe, 188 animals (122 mammals, 65 birds, and one reptile) from a zoo in Slovenia were examined for selected pathogens. Antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum were detected by ELISA in 38% (46/122) and 3% (4/122) of mammals, and in 0% (0/64) and 2% (1/57) of birds, respectively; the reptile (0/1) was negative. A statistically significant difference in T. gondii prevalence was found in Carnivora compared to Cetartiodactyla and primate antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi were detected by IFAT in 44% (52/118) of mammals and 20% (11/56) of birds, respectively; the reptile (0/1) was negative. Herbivores had a higher chance of being infected with E. cuniculi compared to omnivores. Antibodies to Chlamydia abortus and Coxiella burnetii were not detected in any of the 74 tested zoo animals. The sera of 39 wild rodents found in the zoo were also examined; they were negative for all three parasites. The parasite T. gondii was detected by PCR in the tissue of two mute swans (Cygnus olor), three eastern house mice (Mus musculus), one yellow-necked field mouse (Apodemus flavicollis), and one striped field mouse (A. agrarius). Positive samples were genotyped by a single multiplex PCR assay using 15 microsatellite markers; one sample from a mute swan was characterized as type II. This micro-epidemiological study offers a better understanding of pathogens in zoo animals and an understanding of the role of zoos in biosurveillance. MDPI 2021-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8066565/ /pubmed/33916840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040428 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kvapil, Pavel Račnik, Joško Kastelic, Marjan Marková, Jiřina Murat, Jean-Benjamin Kobédová, Kateřina Pittermannová, Pavlina Budíková, Marie Sedlák, Kamil Bártová, Eva Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo |
title | Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo |
title_full | Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo |
title_fullStr | Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo |
title_full_unstemmed | Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo |
title_short | Biosurveillance of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in a Zoo |
title_sort | biosurveillance of selected pathogens with zoonotic potential in a zoo |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8066565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33916840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kvapilpavel biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT racnikjosko biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT kastelicmarjan biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT markovajirina biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT muratjeanbenjamin biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT kobedovakaterina biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT pittermannovapavlina biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT budikovamarie biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT sedlakkamil biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo AT bartovaeva biosurveillanceofselectedpathogenswithzoonoticpotentialinazoo |