Cargando…
Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
This study aimed to investigate the performance of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040603 |
_version_ | 1783682703599599616 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ya-Chin Huang, Jiun-Chi Lin, Chia-I Chien, Hsu-Han Lin, Yu-Yin Wang, Chao-Ling Liang, Fu-Wen Dai, Chia-Yen Chuang, Hung-Yi |
author_facet | Huang, Ya-Chin Huang, Jiun-Chi Lin, Chia-I Chien, Hsu-Han Lin, Yu-Yin Wang, Chao-Ling Liang, Fu-Wen Dai, Chia-Yen Chuang, Hung-Yi |
author_sort | Huang, Ya-Chin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the performance of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index, conicity index (CI), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC, in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in 3143 Taiwanese adults aged 20–79 years. Elevated 10-year ASCVD risk was defined as ≥7.5% using the Pooled Cohort Equations. The performance of different indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses, all cardiometabolic indices (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated with elevated ASCVD risk in both genders, except for ABSI and CI in women. In particular, CVAI had the largest area under the curve (AUC) in men (0.721) and women (0.883) in the ROC analyses. BMI had the lowest AUC in men (0.617), while ABSI had the lowest AUC in women (0.613). The optimal cut-off value for CVAI was 83.7 in men and 70.8 in women. CVAI performed best among various cardiometabolic indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk. CVAI may be a reliable index for identifying people at increased risk of ASCVD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8067018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80670182021-04-25 Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults Huang, Ya-Chin Huang, Jiun-Chi Lin, Chia-I Chien, Hsu-Han Lin, Yu-Yin Wang, Chao-Ling Liang, Fu-Wen Dai, Chia-Yen Chuang, Hung-Yi Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate the performance of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index, conicity index (CI), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC, in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in 3143 Taiwanese adults aged 20–79 years. Elevated 10-year ASCVD risk was defined as ≥7.5% using the Pooled Cohort Equations. The performance of different indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses, all cardiometabolic indices (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated with elevated ASCVD risk in both genders, except for ABSI and CI in women. In particular, CVAI had the largest area under the curve (AUC) in men (0.721) and women (0.883) in the ROC analyses. BMI had the lowest AUC in men (0.617), while ABSI had the lowest AUC in women (0.613). The optimal cut-off value for CVAI was 83.7 in men and 70.8 in women. CVAI performed best among various cardiometabolic indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk. CVAI may be a reliable index for identifying people at increased risk of ASCVD. MDPI 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8067018/ /pubmed/33800660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040603 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Ya-Chin Huang, Jiun-Chi Lin, Chia-I Chien, Hsu-Han Lin, Yu-Yin Wang, Chao-Ling Liang, Fu-Wen Dai, Chia-Yen Chuang, Hung-Yi Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults |
title | Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults |
title_full | Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults |
title_short | Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults |
title_sort | comparison of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyachin comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT huangjiunchi comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT linchiai comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT chienhsuhan comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT linyuyin comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT wangchaoling comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT liangfuwen comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT daichiayen comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults AT chuanghungyi comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults |