Cargando…

Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults

This study aimed to investigate the performance of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ya-Chin, Huang, Jiun-Chi, Lin, Chia-I, Chien, Hsu-Han, Lin, Yu-Yin, Wang, Chao-Ling, Liang, Fu-Wen, Dai, Chia-Yen, Chuang, Hung-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040603
_version_ 1783682703599599616
author Huang, Ya-Chin
Huang, Jiun-Chi
Lin, Chia-I
Chien, Hsu-Han
Lin, Yu-Yin
Wang, Chao-Ling
Liang, Fu-Wen
Dai, Chia-Yen
Chuang, Hung-Yi
author_facet Huang, Ya-Chin
Huang, Jiun-Chi
Lin, Chia-I
Chien, Hsu-Han
Lin, Yu-Yin
Wang, Chao-Ling
Liang, Fu-Wen
Dai, Chia-Yen
Chuang, Hung-Yi
author_sort Huang, Ya-Chin
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the performance of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index, conicity index (CI), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC, in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in 3143 Taiwanese adults aged 20–79 years. Elevated 10-year ASCVD risk was defined as ≥7.5% using the Pooled Cohort Equations. The performance of different indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses, all cardiometabolic indices (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated with elevated ASCVD risk in both genders, except for ABSI and CI in women. In particular, CVAI had the largest area under the curve (AUC) in men (0.721) and women (0.883) in the ROC analyses. BMI had the lowest AUC in men (0.617), while ABSI had the lowest AUC in women (0.613). The optimal cut-off value for CVAI was 83.7 in men and 70.8 in women. CVAI performed best among various cardiometabolic indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk. CVAI may be a reliable index for identifying people at increased risk of ASCVD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8067018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80670182021-04-25 Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults Huang, Ya-Chin Huang, Jiun-Chi Lin, Chia-I Chien, Hsu-Han Lin, Yu-Yin Wang, Chao-Ling Liang, Fu-Wen Dai, Chia-Yen Chuang, Hung-Yi Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate the performance of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), visceral adiposity index, lipid accumulation product, a body shape index (ABSI), body roundness index, conicity index (CI), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC, in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in 3143 Taiwanese adults aged 20–79 years. Elevated 10-year ASCVD risk was defined as ≥7.5% using the Pooled Cohort Equations. The performance of different indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In multivariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses, all cardiometabolic indices (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated with elevated ASCVD risk in both genders, except for ABSI and CI in women. In particular, CVAI had the largest area under the curve (AUC) in men (0.721) and women (0.883) in the ROC analyses. BMI had the lowest AUC in men (0.617), while ABSI had the lowest AUC in women (0.613). The optimal cut-off value for CVAI was 83.7 in men and 70.8 in women. CVAI performed best among various cardiometabolic indices in estimating elevated ASCVD risk. CVAI may be a reliable index for identifying people at increased risk of ASCVD. MDPI 2021-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8067018/ /pubmed/33800660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040603 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Ya-Chin
Huang, Jiun-Chi
Lin, Chia-I
Chien, Hsu-Han
Lin, Yu-Yin
Wang, Chao-Ling
Liang, Fu-Wen
Dai, Chia-Yen
Chuang, Hung-Yi
Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
title Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
title_full Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
title_fullStr Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
title_short Comparison of Innovative and Traditional Cardiometabolic Indices in Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults
title_sort comparison of innovative and traditional cardiometabolic indices in estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33800660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040603
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyachin comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT huangjiunchi comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT linchiai comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT chienhsuhan comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT linyuyin comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT wangchaoling comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT liangfuwen comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT daichiayen comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults
AT chuanghungyi comparisonofinnovativeandtraditionalcardiometabolicindicesinestimatingatheroscleroticcardiovasculardiseaseriskinadults