Cargando…

Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging

In prostate cancer, the early detection of distant spread has been shown to be of importance. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding radionuclides in positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising method for precise disease staging. PET diagnostics depend on image reconstruction techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jonmarker, Olof, Axelsson, Rimma, Nilsson, Ted, Gabrielson, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040630
_version_ 1783682733498695680
author Jonmarker, Olof
Axelsson, Rimma
Nilsson, Ted
Gabrielson, Stefan
author_facet Jonmarker, Olof
Axelsson, Rimma
Nilsson, Ted
Gabrielson, Stefan
author_sort Jonmarker, Olof
collection PubMed
description In prostate cancer, the early detection of distant spread has been shown to be of importance. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding radionuclides in positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising method for precise disease staging. PET diagnostics depend on image reconstruction techniques, and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) is the established standard. Block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) is a more recent reconstruction algorithm and may produce fewer equivocal findings and better lesion detection. Methods: (68)Ga PSMA-11 PET/CT scans of patients with de novo or suspected recurrent prostate cancer were retrospectively reformatted using both the OSEM and BSREM algorithms. The lesions were counted and categorized by three radiologists. The intra-class correlation (ICC) and Cohen’s kappa for the inter-rater reliability were calculated. Results: Sixty-one patients were reviewed. BSREM identified slightly fewer lesions overall and fewer equivocal findings. ICC was excellent with regards to definitive lymph nodes and bone metastasis identification and poor with regards to equivocal metastasis irrespective of the reconstruction algorithm. The median Cohen’s kappa were 0.66, 0.74, 0.61 and 0.43 for OSEM and 0.61, 0.63, 0.66 and 0.53 for BSREM, with respect to the tumor, local lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes and bone metastasis detection, respectively. Conclusions: BSREM in the setting of (68)Ga PMSA PET staging or restaging is comparable to OSEM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8067147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80671472021-04-25 Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging Jonmarker, Olof Axelsson, Rimma Nilsson, Ted Gabrielson, Stefan Diagnostics (Basel) Article In prostate cancer, the early detection of distant spread has been shown to be of importance. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding radionuclides in positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising method for precise disease staging. PET diagnostics depend on image reconstruction techniques, and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) is the established standard. Block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) is a more recent reconstruction algorithm and may produce fewer equivocal findings and better lesion detection. Methods: (68)Ga PSMA-11 PET/CT scans of patients with de novo or suspected recurrent prostate cancer were retrospectively reformatted using both the OSEM and BSREM algorithms. The lesions were counted and categorized by three radiologists. The intra-class correlation (ICC) and Cohen’s kappa for the inter-rater reliability were calculated. Results: Sixty-one patients were reviewed. BSREM identified slightly fewer lesions overall and fewer equivocal findings. ICC was excellent with regards to definitive lymph nodes and bone metastasis identification and poor with regards to equivocal metastasis irrespective of the reconstruction algorithm. The median Cohen’s kappa were 0.66, 0.74, 0.61 and 0.43 for OSEM and 0.61, 0.63, 0.66 and 0.53 for BSREM, with respect to the tumor, local lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes and bone metastasis detection, respectively. Conclusions: BSREM in the setting of (68)Ga PMSA PET staging or restaging is comparable to OSEM. MDPI 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8067147/ /pubmed/33807370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040630 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jonmarker, Olof
Axelsson, Rimma
Nilsson, Ted
Gabrielson, Stefan
Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging
title Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging
title_full Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging
title_short Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging
title_sort comparison of regularized reconstruction and ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction in the diagnostics of prostate cancer using digital time-of-flight (68)ga-psma-11 pet/ct imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33807370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040630
work_keys_str_mv AT jonmarkerolof comparisonofregularizedreconstructionandorderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructioninthediagnosticsofprostatecancerusingdigitaltimeofflight68gapsma11petctimaging
AT axelssonrimma comparisonofregularizedreconstructionandorderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructioninthediagnosticsofprostatecancerusingdigitaltimeofflight68gapsma11petctimaging
AT nilssonted comparisonofregularizedreconstructionandorderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructioninthediagnosticsofprostatecancerusingdigitaltimeofflight68gapsma11petctimaging
AT gabrielsonstefan comparisonofregularizedreconstructionandorderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructioninthediagnosticsofprostatecancerusingdigitaltimeofflight68gapsma11petctimaging