Cargando…
Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Rapid adoption of robotic-assisted general surgery procedures, particularly for cholecystectomy, continues while questions remain about its benefits and utility. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33892794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x |
_version_ | 1783682788047716352 |
---|---|
author | Shenoy, Rivfka Mederos, Michael A. Ye, Linda Mak, Selene S. Begashaw, Meron M. Booth, Marika S. Shekelle, Paul G. Wilson, Mark Gunnar, William Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda Girgis, Mark D. |
author_facet | Shenoy, Rivfka Mederos, Michael A. Ye, Linda Mak, Selene S. Begashaw, Meron M. Booth, Marika S. Shekelle, Paul G. Wilson, Mark Gunnar, William Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda Girgis, Mark D. |
author_sort | Shenoy, Rivfka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid adoption of robotic-assisted general surgery procedures, particularly for cholecystectomy, continues while questions remain about its benefits and utility. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease as compared with the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: A literature search was performed from January 2010 to March 2020, and a narrative analysis was performed as studies were heterogeneous. RESULTS: Of 887 articles screened, 44 met the inclusion criteria (range 20–735,537 patients). Four were randomized controlled trials, and four used propensity-matching. There were variable comparisons between operative techniques with only 19 out of 44 studies comparing techniques using the same number of ports. Operating room time was longer for the robot-assisted technique in the majority of studies (range 11–55 min for 22 studies, p < 0.05; 15 studies showed no difference; two studies showed shorter laparoscopic times), while conversion rates and intraoperative complications were not different. No differences were detected for the length of stay, surgical site infection, or readmissions. Across studies comparing single-port robot-assisted to multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there was a higher rate of incisional hernia; however, no differences were noted when comparing single-port robot-assisted to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were similar for benign, elective gallbladder disease for robot-assisted compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, the rates of complications were low. More high-quality studies are needed as the robot-assisted technique expands to more complex gallbladder disease, where its utility may prove increasingly beneficial. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020156945 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8067374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80673742021-04-26 Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review Shenoy, Rivfka Mederos, Michael A. Ye, Linda Mak, Selene S. Begashaw, Meron M. Booth, Marika S. Shekelle, Paul G. Wilson, Mark Gunnar, William Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda Girgis, Mark D. Syst Rev Systematic Review Update BACKGROUND: Rapid adoption of robotic-assisted general surgery procedures, particularly for cholecystectomy, continues while questions remain about its benefits and utility. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease as compared with the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: A literature search was performed from January 2010 to March 2020, and a narrative analysis was performed as studies were heterogeneous. RESULTS: Of 887 articles screened, 44 met the inclusion criteria (range 20–735,537 patients). Four were randomized controlled trials, and four used propensity-matching. There were variable comparisons between operative techniques with only 19 out of 44 studies comparing techniques using the same number of ports. Operating room time was longer for the robot-assisted technique in the majority of studies (range 11–55 min for 22 studies, p < 0.05; 15 studies showed no difference; two studies showed shorter laparoscopic times), while conversion rates and intraoperative complications were not different. No differences were detected for the length of stay, surgical site infection, or readmissions. Across studies comparing single-port robot-assisted to multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there was a higher rate of incisional hernia; however, no differences were noted when comparing single-port robot-assisted to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were similar for benign, elective gallbladder disease for robot-assisted compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, the rates of complications were low. More high-quality studies are needed as the robot-assisted technique expands to more complex gallbladder disease, where its utility may prove increasingly beneficial. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020156945 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x. BioMed Central 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8067374/ /pubmed/33892794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Update Shenoy, Rivfka Mederos, Michael A. Ye, Linda Mak, Selene S. Begashaw, Meron M. Booth, Marika S. Shekelle, Paul G. Wilson, Mark Gunnar, William Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda Girgis, Mark D. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
title | Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
title_full | Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
title_short | Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
title_sort | intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33892794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenoyrivfka intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT mederosmichaela intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT yelinda intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT makselenes intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT begashawmeronm intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT boothmarikas intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT shekellepaulg intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT wilsonmark intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT gunnarwilliam intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT maggardgibbonsmelinda intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview AT girgismarkd intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview |