Cargando…

Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Rapid adoption of robotic-assisted general surgery procedures, particularly for cholecystectomy, continues while questions remain about its benefits and utility. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shenoy, Rivfka, Mederos, Michael A., Ye, Linda, Mak, Selene S., Begashaw, Meron M., Booth, Marika S., Shekelle, Paul G., Wilson, Mark, Gunnar, William, Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda, Girgis, Mark D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33892794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x
_version_ 1783682788047716352
author Shenoy, Rivfka
Mederos, Michael A.
Ye, Linda
Mak, Selene S.
Begashaw, Meron M.
Booth, Marika S.
Shekelle, Paul G.
Wilson, Mark
Gunnar, William
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Girgis, Mark D.
author_facet Shenoy, Rivfka
Mederos, Michael A.
Ye, Linda
Mak, Selene S.
Begashaw, Meron M.
Booth, Marika S.
Shekelle, Paul G.
Wilson, Mark
Gunnar, William
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Girgis, Mark D.
author_sort Shenoy, Rivfka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid adoption of robotic-assisted general surgery procedures, particularly for cholecystectomy, continues while questions remain about its benefits and utility. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease as compared with the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: A literature search was performed from January 2010 to March 2020, and a narrative analysis was performed as studies were heterogeneous. RESULTS: Of 887 articles screened, 44 met the inclusion criteria (range 20–735,537 patients). Four were randomized controlled trials, and four used propensity-matching. There were variable comparisons between operative techniques with only 19 out of 44 studies comparing techniques using the same number of ports. Operating room time was longer for the robot-assisted technique in the majority of studies (range 11–55 min for 22 studies, p < 0.05; 15 studies showed no difference; two studies showed shorter laparoscopic times), while conversion rates and intraoperative complications were not different. No differences were detected for the length of stay, surgical site infection, or readmissions. Across studies comparing single-port robot-assisted to multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there was a higher rate of incisional hernia; however, no differences were noted when comparing single-port robot-assisted to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were similar for benign, elective gallbladder disease for robot-assisted compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, the rates of complications were low. More high-quality studies are needed as the robot-assisted technique expands to more complex gallbladder disease, where its utility may prove increasingly beneficial. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020156945 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8067374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80673742021-04-26 Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review Shenoy, Rivfka Mederos, Michael A. Ye, Linda Mak, Selene S. Begashaw, Meron M. Booth, Marika S. Shekelle, Paul G. Wilson, Mark Gunnar, William Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda Girgis, Mark D. Syst Rev Systematic Review Update BACKGROUND: Rapid adoption of robotic-assisted general surgery procedures, particularly for cholecystectomy, continues while questions remain about its benefits and utility. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of robot-assisted cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease as compared with the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: A literature search was performed from January 2010 to March 2020, and a narrative analysis was performed as studies were heterogeneous. RESULTS: Of 887 articles screened, 44 met the inclusion criteria (range 20–735,537 patients). Four were randomized controlled trials, and four used propensity-matching. There were variable comparisons between operative techniques with only 19 out of 44 studies comparing techniques using the same number of ports. Operating room time was longer for the robot-assisted technique in the majority of studies (range 11–55 min for 22 studies, p < 0.05; 15 studies showed no difference; two studies showed shorter laparoscopic times), while conversion rates and intraoperative complications were not different. No differences were detected for the length of stay, surgical site infection, or readmissions. Across studies comparing single-port robot-assisted to multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there was a higher rate of incisional hernia; however, no differences were noted when comparing single-port robot-assisted to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were similar for benign, elective gallbladder disease for robot-assisted compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Overall, the rates of complications were low. More high-quality studies are needed as the robot-assisted technique expands to more complex gallbladder disease, where its utility may prove increasingly beneficial. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020156945 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x. BioMed Central 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8067374/ /pubmed/33892794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review Update
Shenoy, Rivfka
Mederos, Michael A.
Ye, Linda
Mak, Selene S.
Begashaw, Meron M.
Booth, Marika S.
Shekelle, Paul G.
Wilson, Mark
Gunnar, William
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Girgis, Mark D.
Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
title Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
title_full Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
title_short Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
title_sort intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33892794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01673-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shenoyrivfka intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT mederosmichaela intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT yelinda intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT makselenes intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT begashawmeronm intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT boothmarikas intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT shekellepaulg intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT wilsonmark intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT gunnarwilliam intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT maggardgibbonsmelinda intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview
AT girgismarkd intraoperativeandpostoperativeoutcomesofrobotassistedcholecystectomyasystematicreview