Cargando…

Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions

Modified-live vaccines (MLVs) against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSVs) are usually administrated to piglets at weaning when swine influenza A virus (swIAV) infections frequently occur. SwIAV infection induces a strong interferon alpha (IFNa) response and IFNa was shown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renson, Patricia, Deblanc, Céline, Bougon, Juliette, Le Dimna, Mireille, Gorin, Stéphane, Mahé, Sophie, Barbier, Nicolas, Paboeuf, Frédéric, Simon, Gaëlle, Bourry, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040356
_version_ 1783682886985056256
author Renson, Patricia
Deblanc, Céline
Bougon, Juliette
Le Dimna, Mireille
Gorin, Stéphane
Mahé, Sophie
Barbier, Nicolas
Paboeuf, Frédéric
Simon, Gaëlle
Bourry, Olivier
author_facet Renson, Patricia
Deblanc, Céline
Bougon, Juliette
Le Dimna, Mireille
Gorin, Stéphane
Mahé, Sophie
Barbier, Nicolas
Paboeuf, Frédéric
Simon, Gaëlle
Bourry, Olivier
author_sort Renson, Patricia
collection PubMed
description Modified-live vaccines (MLVs) against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSVs) are usually administrated to piglets at weaning when swine influenza A virus (swIAV) infections frequently occur. SwIAV infection induces a strong interferon alpha (IFNa) response and IFNa was shown to abrogate PRRSV2 MLV replication and an inherent immune response. In this study, we evaluated the impacts of swIAV infection on the replication of a PRRSV1 MLV (MLV1), post-vaccine immune responses and post-challenge vaccine efficacy at both the systemic and pulmonary levels. Piglets were either swIAV inoculated and MLV1 vaccinated 6 h apart or singly vaccinated or mock inoculated and mock vaccinated. Four weeks after vaccination, the piglets were challenged with a PRRSV1 field strain. The results showed that swIAV infection delayed MLV1 viremia by six days and post-vaccine seroconversion by four days. After the PRRSV1 challenge, the swIAV enhanced the PRRSV1-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) but the PRRSV1 field strain viremia was not better controlled. High IFNa levels that were detected early after swIAV infection could have been responsible for both the inhibition of MLV1 replication and CMI enhancement. Thus, whereas swIAV infection had a negative impact on humoral responses post-vaccination, it did not interfere with the protective effectiveness of the PRRSV MLV1 in our experimental conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8067798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80677982021-04-25 Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions Renson, Patricia Deblanc, Céline Bougon, Juliette Le Dimna, Mireille Gorin, Stéphane Mahé, Sophie Barbier, Nicolas Paboeuf, Frédéric Simon, Gaëlle Bourry, Olivier Vaccines (Basel) Article Modified-live vaccines (MLVs) against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSVs) are usually administrated to piglets at weaning when swine influenza A virus (swIAV) infections frequently occur. SwIAV infection induces a strong interferon alpha (IFNa) response and IFNa was shown to abrogate PRRSV2 MLV replication and an inherent immune response. In this study, we evaluated the impacts of swIAV infection on the replication of a PRRSV1 MLV (MLV1), post-vaccine immune responses and post-challenge vaccine efficacy at both the systemic and pulmonary levels. Piglets were either swIAV inoculated and MLV1 vaccinated 6 h apart or singly vaccinated or mock inoculated and mock vaccinated. Four weeks after vaccination, the piglets were challenged with a PRRSV1 field strain. The results showed that swIAV infection delayed MLV1 viremia by six days and post-vaccine seroconversion by four days. After the PRRSV1 challenge, the swIAV enhanced the PRRSV1-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) but the PRRSV1 field strain viremia was not better controlled. High IFNa levels that were detected early after swIAV infection could have been responsible for both the inhibition of MLV1 replication and CMI enhancement. Thus, whereas swIAV infection had a negative impact on humoral responses post-vaccination, it did not interfere with the protective effectiveness of the PRRSV MLV1 in our experimental conditions. MDPI 2021-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8067798/ /pubmed/33917103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040356 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Renson, Patricia
Deblanc, Céline
Bougon, Juliette
Le Dimna, Mireille
Gorin, Stéphane
Mahé, Sophie
Barbier, Nicolas
Paboeuf, Frédéric
Simon, Gaëlle
Bourry, Olivier
Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions
title Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions
title_full Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions
title_fullStr Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions
title_short Concomitant Swine Influenza A Virus Infection Alters PRRSV1 MLV Viremia in Piglets but Does Not Interfere with Vaccine Protection in Experimental Conditions
title_sort concomitant swine influenza a virus infection alters prrsv1 mlv viremia in piglets but does not interfere with vaccine protection in experimental conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8067798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040356
work_keys_str_mv AT rensonpatricia concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT deblancceline concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT bougonjuliette concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT ledimnamireille concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT gorinstephane concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT mahesophie concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT barbiernicolas concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT paboeuffrederic concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT simongaelle concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions
AT bourryolivier concomitantswineinfluenzaavirusinfectionaltersprrsv1mlvviremiainpigletsbutdoesnotinterferewithvaccineprotectioninexperimentalconditions