Cargando…

Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy is a technique used to manage early stage left-sided breast cancer. This study compared dosimetric indices of patient-specific X-ray versus proton therapy DIBH plans to explore differences in target coverage, radiation doses to organs at risk, and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Lisa, Penfold, Scott, Giles, Eileen, Le, Hien, Short, Michala
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040282
_version_ 1783682992059711488
author Cunningham, Lisa
Penfold, Scott
Giles, Eileen
Le, Hien
Short, Michala
author_facet Cunningham, Lisa
Penfold, Scott
Giles, Eileen
Le, Hien
Short, Michala
author_sort Cunningham, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy is a technique used to manage early stage left-sided breast cancer. This study compared dosimetric indices of patient-specific X-ray versus proton therapy DIBH plans to explore differences in target coverage, radiation doses to organs at risk, and the impact of breast size. Radiotherapy plans of sixteen breast cancer patients previously treated with DIBH radiotherapy were re-planned with hybrid inverse-planned intensity modulated X-ray radiotherapy (h-IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The total prescribed dose was 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions for all cases. Comparisons between the clinical, h-IMRT, and IMPT evaluated doses to target volumes, organs at risk, and correlations between doses and breast size. Although no differences were observed in target volume coverage between techniques, the h-IMRT and IMPT were able to produce more even dose distributions and IMPT delivered significantly less dose to all organs at risk than both X-ray techniques. A moderate negative correlation was observed between breast size and dose to the target in X-ray techniques, but not IMPT. Both h-IMRT and IMPT produced plans with more homogeneous dose distribution than forward-planned IMRT and IMPT achieved significantly lower doses to organs at risk compared to X-ray techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8068250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80682502021-04-25 Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Cunningham, Lisa Penfold, Scott Giles, Eileen Le, Hien Short, Michala J Pers Med Article Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy is a technique used to manage early stage left-sided breast cancer. This study compared dosimetric indices of patient-specific X-ray versus proton therapy DIBH plans to explore differences in target coverage, radiation doses to organs at risk, and the impact of breast size. Radiotherapy plans of sixteen breast cancer patients previously treated with DIBH radiotherapy were re-planned with hybrid inverse-planned intensity modulated X-ray radiotherapy (h-IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The total prescribed dose was 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions for all cases. Comparisons between the clinical, h-IMRT, and IMPT evaluated doses to target volumes, organs at risk, and correlations between doses and breast size. Although no differences were observed in target volume coverage between techniques, the h-IMRT and IMPT were able to produce more even dose distributions and IMPT delivered significantly less dose to all organs at risk than both X-ray techniques. A moderate negative correlation was observed between breast size and dose to the target in X-ray techniques, but not IMPT. Both h-IMRT and IMPT produced plans with more homogeneous dose distribution than forward-planned IMRT and IMPT achieved significantly lower doses to organs at risk compared to X-ray techniques. MDPI 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8068250/ /pubmed/33917818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040282 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cunningham, Lisa
Penfold, Scott
Giles, Eileen
Le, Hien
Short, Michala
Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
title Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
title_full Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
title_short Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
title_sort impact of breast size on dosimetric indices in proton versus x-ray radiotherapy for breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040282
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamlisa impactofbreastsizeondosimetricindicesinprotonversusxrayradiotherapyforbreastcancer
AT penfoldscott impactofbreastsizeondosimetricindicesinprotonversusxrayradiotherapyforbreastcancer
AT gileseileen impactofbreastsizeondosimetricindicesinprotonversusxrayradiotherapyforbreastcancer
AT lehien impactofbreastsizeondosimetricindicesinprotonversusxrayradiotherapyforbreastcancer
AT shortmichala impactofbreastsizeondosimetricindicesinprotonversusxrayradiotherapyforbreastcancer