Cargando…
Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach
Impedance pneumography has been suggested as an ambulatory technique for the monitoring of respiratory diseases. However, its ambulatory nature makes the recordings more prone to noise sources. It is important that such noisy segments are identified and removed, since they could have a huge impact o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082613 |
_version_ | 1783682999523475456 |
---|---|
author | Moeyersons, Jonathan Morales, John Seeuws, Nick Van Hoof, Chris Hermeling, Evelien Groenendaal, Willemijn Willems, Rik Van Huffel, Sabine Varon, Carolina |
author_facet | Moeyersons, Jonathan Morales, John Seeuws, Nick Van Hoof, Chris Hermeling, Evelien Groenendaal, Willemijn Willems, Rik Van Huffel, Sabine Varon, Carolina |
author_sort | Moeyersons, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impedance pneumography has been suggested as an ambulatory technique for the monitoring of respiratory diseases. However, its ambulatory nature makes the recordings more prone to noise sources. It is important that such noisy segments are identified and removed, since they could have a huge impact on the performance of data-driven decision support tools. In this study, we investigated the added value of machine learning algorithms to separate clean from noisy bio-impedance signals. We compared three approaches: a heuristic algorithm, a feature-based classification model (SVM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The dataset consists of 47 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who performed an inspiratory threshold loading protocol. During this protocol, their respiration was recorded with a bio-impedance device and a spirometer, which served as a gold standard. Four annotators scored the signals for the presence of artefacts, based on the reference signal. We have shown that the accuracy of both machine learning approaches (SVM: 87.77 ± 2.64% and CNN: 87.20 ± 2.78%) is significantly higher, compared to the heuristic approach (84.69 ± 2.32%). Moreover, no significant differences could be observed between the two machine learning approaches. The feature-based and neural network model obtained a respective AUC of [Formula: see text] % and [Formula: see text] %. These findings show that a data-driven approach could be beneficial for the task of artefact detection in respiratory thoracic bio-impedance signals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8068282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80682822021-04-25 Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach Moeyersons, Jonathan Morales, John Seeuws, Nick Van Hoof, Chris Hermeling, Evelien Groenendaal, Willemijn Willems, Rik Van Huffel, Sabine Varon, Carolina Sensors (Basel) Article Impedance pneumography has been suggested as an ambulatory technique for the monitoring of respiratory diseases. However, its ambulatory nature makes the recordings more prone to noise sources. It is important that such noisy segments are identified and removed, since they could have a huge impact on the performance of data-driven decision support tools. In this study, we investigated the added value of machine learning algorithms to separate clean from noisy bio-impedance signals. We compared three approaches: a heuristic algorithm, a feature-based classification model (SVM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The dataset consists of 47 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who performed an inspiratory threshold loading protocol. During this protocol, their respiration was recorded with a bio-impedance device and a spirometer, which served as a gold standard. Four annotators scored the signals for the presence of artefacts, based on the reference signal. We have shown that the accuracy of both machine learning approaches (SVM: 87.77 ± 2.64% and CNN: 87.20 ± 2.78%) is significantly higher, compared to the heuristic approach (84.69 ± 2.32%). Moreover, no significant differences could be observed between the two machine learning approaches. The feature-based and neural network model obtained a respective AUC of [Formula: see text] % and [Formula: see text] %. These findings show that a data-driven approach could be beneficial for the task of artefact detection in respiratory thoracic bio-impedance signals. MDPI 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8068282/ /pubmed/33917824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082613 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Moeyersons, Jonathan Morales, John Seeuws, Nick Van Hoof, Chris Hermeling, Evelien Groenendaal, Willemijn Willems, Rik Van Huffel, Sabine Varon, Carolina Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach |
title | Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_full | Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_fullStr | Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_short | Artefact Detection in Impedance Pneumography Signals: A Machine Learning Approach |
title_sort | artefact detection in impedance pneumography signals: a machine learning approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33917824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082613 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moeyersonsjonathan artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT moralesjohn artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT seeuwsnick artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT vanhoofchris artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT hermelingevelien artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT groenendaalwillemijn artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT willemsrik artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT vanhuffelsabine artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach AT varoncarolina artefactdetectioninimpedancepneumographysignalsamachinelearningapproach |