Cargando…
Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a composite metric of arm elevation and trapezius activity (i.e. neck/shoulder load) is more strongly associated with the 2-year course of neck and shoulder pain intensity (NSPi) among construction and healthcare workers than each exposure separately. METHODS: Dominan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01610-w |
_version_ | 1783683065709592576 |
---|---|
author | Merkus, Suzanne Lerato Mathiassen, Svend Erik Lunde, Lars-Kristian Koch, Markus Wærsted, Morten Forsman, Mikael Knardahl, Stein Veiersted, Kaj Bo |
author_facet | Merkus, Suzanne Lerato Mathiassen, Svend Erik Lunde, Lars-Kristian Koch, Markus Wærsted, Morten Forsman, Mikael Knardahl, Stein Veiersted, Kaj Bo |
author_sort | Merkus, Suzanne Lerato |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a composite metric of arm elevation and trapezius activity (i.e. neck/shoulder load) is more strongly associated with the 2-year course of neck and shoulder pain intensity (NSPi) among construction and healthcare workers than each exposure separately. METHODS: Dominant arm elevation and upper trapezius muscle activity were estimated in construction and healthcare employees (n = 118) at baseline, using accelerometry and normalized surface electromyography (%MVE), respectively. At baseline and every 6 months for 2 years, workers reported NSPi (score 0–3). Compositions of working time were determined for arm elevation (< 30°; 30–60°; > 60°), trapezius activity (< 0.5%; 0.5–7.0%; > 7.0%MVE), and a composite metric “neck/shoulder load” (restitution, low, medium, and high load). Associations between each of these three compositions and the 2-year course of NSPi were determined using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Associations between exposure compositions and the course of NSPi were all weak and in general uncertain. Time spent in 0.5–7.0%MVE showed the largest and most certain association with changes in NSPi during follow-up (β = − 0.13; p = 0.037; corresponding to a −0.01 change in NPSi every 6 months). Among pain-free workers at baseline, medium (β = − 0.23; p = 0.039) and high (β = 0.15; p = 0.031) neck/shoulder load contributed the most to explaining changes in NSPi. CONCLUSION: The composite metric of neck/shoulder load did not show a stronger association with the course of NSPi than arm elevation or trapezius activity alone in the entire population, while some indications of a stronger association were found among those who were pain-free at baseline. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00420-020-01610-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8068682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80686822021-05-05 Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare Merkus, Suzanne Lerato Mathiassen, Svend Erik Lunde, Lars-Kristian Koch, Markus Wærsted, Morten Forsman, Mikael Knardahl, Stein Veiersted, Kaj Bo Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a composite metric of arm elevation and trapezius activity (i.e. neck/shoulder load) is more strongly associated with the 2-year course of neck and shoulder pain intensity (NSPi) among construction and healthcare workers than each exposure separately. METHODS: Dominant arm elevation and upper trapezius muscle activity were estimated in construction and healthcare employees (n = 118) at baseline, using accelerometry and normalized surface electromyography (%MVE), respectively. At baseline and every 6 months for 2 years, workers reported NSPi (score 0–3). Compositions of working time were determined for arm elevation (< 30°; 30–60°; > 60°), trapezius activity (< 0.5%; 0.5–7.0%; > 7.0%MVE), and a composite metric “neck/shoulder load” (restitution, low, medium, and high load). Associations between each of these three compositions and the 2-year course of NSPi were determined using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Associations between exposure compositions and the course of NSPi were all weak and in general uncertain. Time spent in 0.5–7.0%MVE showed the largest and most certain association with changes in NSPi during follow-up (β = − 0.13; p = 0.037; corresponding to a −0.01 change in NPSi every 6 months). Among pain-free workers at baseline, medium (β = − 0.23; p = 0.039) and high (β = 0.15; p = 0.031) neck/shoulder load contributed the most to explaining changes in NSPi. CONCLUSION: The composite metric of neck/shoulder load did not show a stronger association with the course of NSPi than arm elevation or trapezius activity alone in the entire population, while some indications of a stronger association were found among those who were pain-free at baseline. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00420-020-01610-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8068682/ /pubmed/33278002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01610-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Merkus, Suzanne Lerato Mathiassen, Svend Erik Lunde, Lars-Kristian Koch, Markus Wærsted, Morten Forsman, Mikael Knardahl, Stein Veiersted, Kaj Bo Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
title | Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
title_full | Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
title_fullStr | Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
title_full_unstemmed | Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
title_short | Can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? A prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
title_sort | can a metric combining arm elevation and trapezius muscle activity predict neck/shoulder pain? a prospective cohort study in construction and healthcare |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8068682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01610-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merkussuzannelerato canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT mathiassensvenderik canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT lundelarskristian canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT kochmarkus canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT wærstedmorten canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT forsmanmikael canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT knardahlstein canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare AT veierstedkajbo canametriccombiningarmelevationandtrapeziusmuscleactivitypredictneckshoulderpainaprospectivecohortstudyinconstructionandhealthcare |