Cargando…

Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) is a recently developed method to prevent the exposure of tumor cells, and we performed a small prospective trial of NESS-EFTR for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). In this study, we compared the results o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eom, Bang Wool, Kim, Chan Gyoo, Kook, Myeong-Cherl, Yoon, Hong Man, Ryu, Keun Won, Kim, Young-Woo, Rho, Ji Yoon, Kim, Young-Il, Lee, Jong Yeul, Choi, Il Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924610
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081858
_version_ 1783683143748812800
author Eom, Bang Wool
Kim, Chan Gyoo
Kook, Myeong-Cherl
Yoon, Hong Man
Ryu, Keun Won
Kim, Young-Woo
Rho, Ji Yoon
Kim, Young-Il
Lee, Jong Yeul
Choi, Il Ju
author_facet Eom, Bang Wool
Kim, Chan Gyoo
Kook, Myeong-Cherl
Yoon, Hong Man
Ryu, Keun Won
Kim, Young-Woo
Rho, Ji Yoon
Kim, Young-Il
Lee, Jong Yeul
Choi, Il Ju
author_sort Eom, Bang Wool
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) is a recently developed method to prevent the exposure of tumor cells, and we performed a small prospective trial of NESS-EFTR for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). In this study, we compared the results of NESS-EFTR trial with those of another small prospective trial of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery which was performed in different time period. The results of this study show the feasibility of NESS-EFTR for gastric SETs and provide evidence for the clinical application of the NESS-EFTR procedure. ABSTRACT: Recently, nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) method was developed to avoid tumor exposure to the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of the NESS-EFTR method with those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). A prospective single-center trial of LECS for gastric SETs was performed from March 2012 to October 2013 with a separate prospective trial of NESS-EFTR performed from August 2015 to June 2017, enrolling 15 patients each. Among the 30 enrolled patients, 14 who underwent LECS and 11 who underwent NESS-EFTR were finally included in the analysis. The rate of complete resection and successful closure was 100% in both groups. The operating time was longer for NESS-EFTR group than for LECS (110 vs. 189 min; p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative complications except one case of transient fever in the NESS-EFTR group. One patient in the LECS group had peritoneal seeding of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at 17 months postoperatively, and there was no other recurrence. Although NESS-EFTR had long operating and procedure times, it was feasible for patients with gastric SETs requiring a nonexposure technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80690392021-04-26 Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials Eom, Bang Wool Kim, Chan Gyoo Kook, Myeong-Cherl Yoon, Hong Man Ryu, Keun Won Kim, Young-Woo Rho, Ji Yoon Kim, Young-Il Lee, Jong Yeul Choi, Il Ju Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) is a recently developed method to prevent the exposure of tumor cells, and we performed a small prospective trial of NESS-EFTR for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). In this study, we compared the results of NESS-EFTR trial with those of another small prospective trial of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery which was performed in different time period. The results of this study show the feasibility of NESS-EFTR for gastric SETs and provide evidence for the clinical application of the NESS-EFTR procedure. ABSTRACT: Recently, nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) method was developed to avoid tumor exposure to the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of the NESS-EFTR method with those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). A prospective single-center trial of LECS for gastric SETs was performed from March 2012 to October 2013 with a separate prospective trial of NESS-EFTR performed from August 2015 to June 2017, enrolling 15 patients each. Among the 30 enrolled patients, 14 who underwent LECS and 11 who underwent NESS-EFTR were finally included in the analysis. The rate of complete resection and successful closure was 100% in both groups. The operating time was longer for NESS-EFTR group than for LECS (110 vs. 189 min; p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative complications except one case of transient fever in the NESS-EFTR group. One patient in the LECS group had peritoneal seeding of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at 17 months postoperatively, and there was no other recurrence. Although NESS-EFTR had long operating and procedure times, it was feasible for patients with gastric SETs requiring a nonexposure technique. MDPI 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8069039/ /pubmed/33924610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081858 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Eom, Bang Wool
Kim, Chan Gyoo
Kook, Myeong-Cherl
Yoon, Hong Man
Ryu, Keun Won
Kim, Young-Woo
Rho, Ji Yoon
Kim, Young-Il
Lee, Jong Yeul
Choi, Il Ju
Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials
title Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials
title_full Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials
title_fullStr Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials
title_short Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials
title_sort feasibility of non-exposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection in comparison with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors: results of two independent prospective trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924610
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081858
work_keys_str_mv AT eombangwool feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT kimchangyoo feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT kookmyeongcherl feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT yoonhongman feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT ryukeunwon feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT kimyoungwoo feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT rhojiyoon feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT kimyoungil feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT leejongyeul feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials
AT choiilju feasibilityofnonexposuresimplesuturingendoscopicfullthicknessresectionincomparisonwithlaparoscopicendoscopiccooperativesurgeryforgastricsubepithelialtumorsresultsoftwoindependentprospectivetrials