Cargando…

Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat

The purpose of this study was to analyse in detail body weight squat (BWS)’ fatigue effect on the range of motions (ROM) of the hip, knee, ankle and ground reaction forces (GRF). Twenty male recreational athletes (24.0 ± 3.1 years, 178.85 ± 7.12 cm and 78.7 ± 11.45 kg) participated in this study. BW...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erman, Berkant, Ozkol, Mehmet Zeki, Ivanović, Jelena, Arslan, Hakan, Ćosić, Marko, Yuzbasioglu, Yasin, Dopsaj, Milivoj, Aksit, Tolga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084005
_version_ 1783683160127569920
author Erman, Berkant
Ozkol, Mehmet Zeki
Ivanović, Jelena
Arslan, Hakan
Ćosić, Marko
Yuzbasioglu, Yasin
Dopsaj, Milivoj
Aksit, Tolga
author_facet Erman, Berkant
Ozkol, Mehmet Zeki
Ivanović, Jelena
Arslan, Hakan
Ćosić, Marko
Yuzbasioglu, Yasin
Dopsaj, Milivoj
Aksit, Tolga
author_sort Erman, Berkant
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to analyse in detail body weight squat (BWS)’ fatigue effect on the range of motions (ROM) of the hip, knee, ankle and ground reaction forces (GRF). Twenty male recreational athletes (24.0 ± 3.1 years, 178.85 ± 7.12 cm and 78.7 ± 11.45 kg) participated in this study. BWS were performed on four load cell platforms until the participants failed to continue. Participants performed 73 ± 27 repetitions and the duration to complete of the repetitions was 140.72 ± 62.28 s during the BWS exercise. The forefoot and hindfoot of the feet were on two load cells, thus, there were two under each foot. All of the data collected was divided into three sections for analysis (24 ± 9 repetitions for each). In terms of GRF of the fore feet and hind feet, significant differences and medium to large effect size were found between each section (p = 0.006~0.040, ES = 0.693~0.492). No significant differences were found between right and left leg in all sections. Significant differences were found in the ROM of the hip between the sections of first-third (p = 0.044, ES = 0.482) and second-third (p = 0.034, ES = 0.510), the ROM of the knee first-third (p = 0.014, ES = 0.602) and second-third (p = 0.005, ES = 0.701) and for the ROM of the ankle first-second (p = 0.045, ES = 0.479). As a result, end-of-exercise fatigue caused an increase in the ROM of the hip, knee and ankle. Thus, it is observed that fatigue induced increased ROM, also increases the GRF towards the forefeet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80691092021-04-26 Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat Erman, Berkant Ozkol, Mehmet Zeki Ivanović, Jelena Arslan, Hakan Ćosić, Marko Yuzbasioglu, Yasin Dopsaj, Milivoj Aksit, Tolga Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The purpose of this study was to analyse in detail body weight squat (BWS)’ fatigue effect on the range of motions (ROM) of the hip, knee, ankle and ground reaction forces (GRF). Twenty male recreational athletes (24.0 ± 3.1 years, 178.85 ± 7.12 cm and 78.7 ± 11.45 kg) participated in this study. BWS were performed on four load cell platforms until the participants failed to continue. Participants performed 73 ± 27 repetitions and the duration to complete of the repetitions was 140.72 ± 62.28 s during the BWS exercise. The forefoot and hindfoot of the feet were on two load cells, thus, there were two under each foot. All of the data collected was divided into three sections for analysis (24 ± 9 repetitions for each). In terms of GRF of the fore feet and hind feet, significant differences and medium to large effect size were found between each section (p = 0.006~0.040, ES = 0.693~0.492). No significant differences were found between right and left leg in all sections. Significant differences were found in the ROM of the hip between the sections of first-third (p = 0.044, ES = 0.482) and second-third (p = 0.034, ES = 0.510), the ROM of the knee first-third (p = 0.014, ES = 0.602) and second-third (p = 0.005, ES = 0.701) and for the ROM of the ankle first-second (p = 0.045, ES = 0.479). As a result, end-of-exercise fatigue caused an increase in the ROM of the hip, knee and ankle. Thus, it is observed that fatigue induced increased ROM, also increases the GRF towards the forefeet. MDPI 2021-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8069109/ /pubmed/33920378 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084005 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Erman, Berkant
Ozkol, Mehmet Zeki
Ivanović, Jelena
Arslan, Hakan
Ćosić, Marko
Yuzbasioglu, Yasin
Dopsaj, Milivoj
Aksit, Tolga
Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat
title Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat
title_full Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat
title_fullStr Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat
title_full_unstemmed Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat
title_short Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat
title_sort assessments of ground reaction force and range of motion in terms of fatigue during the body weight squat
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920378
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084005
work_keys_str_mv AT ermanberkant assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT ozkolmehmetzeki assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT ivanovicjelena assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT arslanhakan assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT cosicmarko assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT yuzbasiogluyasin assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT dopsajmilivoj assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat
AT aksittolga assessmentsofgroundreactionforceandrangeofmotionintermsoffatigueduringthebodyweightsquat