Cargando…

Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor in adults, with a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Immunotherapy is currently being evaluated as an alternate treatment modality for recurrent GBMs in clinical trials. These immunotherapeutic approaches harness the patient’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chawla, Sanjeev, Shehu, Vanessa, Gupta, Pradeep K., Nath, Kavindra, Poptani, Harish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22083867
_version_ 1783683167367987200
author Chawla, Sanjeev
Shehu, Vanessa
Gupta, Pradeep K.
Nath, Kavindra
Poptani, Harish
author_facet Chawla, Sanjeev
Shehu, Vanessa
Gupta, Pradeep K.
Nath, Kavindra
Poptani, Harish
author_sort Chawla, Sanjeev
collection PubMed
description Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor in adults, with a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Immunotherapy is currently being evaluated as an alternate treatment modality for recurrent GBMs in clinical trials. These immunotherapeutic approaches harness the patient’s immune response to fight and eliminate tumor cells. Standard MR imaging is not adequate for response assessment to immunotherapy in GBM patients even after using refined response assessment criteria secondary to amplified immune response. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of effective and alternative neuroimaging techniques for accurate response assessment. To this end, some groups have reported the potential of diffusion and perfusion MR imaging and amino acid-based positron emission tomography techniques in evaluating treatment response to different immunotherapeutic regimens in GBMs. The main goal of these techniques is to provide definitive metrics of treatment response at earlier time points for making informed decisions on future therapeutic interventions. This review provides an overview of available immunotherapeutic approaches used to treat GBMs. It discusses the limitations of conventional imaging and potential utilities of physiologic imaging techniques in the response assessment to immunotherapies. It also describes challenges associated with these imaging methods and potential solutions to avoid them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80691402021-04-26 Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas Chawla, Sanjeev Shehu, Vanessa Gupta, Pradeep K. Nath, Kavindra Poptani, Harish Int J Mol Sci Review Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor in adults, with a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Immunotherapy is currently being evaluated as an alternate treatment modality for recurrent GBMs in clinical trials. These immunotherapeutic approaches harness the patient’s immune response to fight and eliminate tumor cells. Standard MR imaging is not adequate for response assessment to immunotherapy in GBM patients even after using refined response assessment criteria secondary to amplified immune response. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of effective and alternative neuroimaging techniques for accurate response assessment. To this end, some groups have reported the potential of diffusion and perfusion MR imaging and amino acid-based positron emission tomography techniques in evaluating treatment response to different immunotherapeutic regimens in GBMs. The main goal of these techniques is to provide definitive metrics of treatment response at earlier time points for making informed decisions on future therapeutic interventions. This review provides an overview of available immunotherapeutic approaches used to treat GBMs. It discusses the limitations of conventional imaging and potential utilities of physiologic imaging techniques in the response assessment to immunotherapies. It also describes challenges associated with these imaging methods and potential solutions to avoid them. MDPI 2021-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8069140/ /pubmed/33918043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22083867 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chawla, Sanjeev
Shehu, Vanessa
Gupta, Pradeep K.
Nath, Kavindra
Poptani, Harish
Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas
title Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas
title_full Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas
title_fullStr Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas
title_short Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas
title_sort physiological imaging methods for evaluating response to immunotherapies in glioblastomas
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22083867
work_keys_str_mv AT chawlasanjeev physiologicalimagingmethodsforevaluatingresponsetoimmunotherapiesinglioblastomas
AT shehuvanessa physiologicalimagingmethodsforevaluatingresponsetoimmunotherapiesinglioblastomas
AT guptapradeepk physiologicalimagingmethodsforevaluatingresponsetoimmunotherapiesinglioblastomas
AT nathkavindra physiologicalimagingmethodsforevaluatingresponsetoimmunotherapiesinglioblastomas
AT poptaniharish physiologicalimagingmethodsforevaluatingresponsetoimmunotherapiesinglioblastomas