Cargando…

Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study

Background: Real-life data on the administration of letermovir as cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center matched cohort study, comparing consecutive high-risk allogeneic H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Royston, Léna, Royston, Eva, Masouridi-Levrat, Stavroula, Vernaz, Nathalie, Chalandon, Yves, Van Delden, Christian, Neofytos, Dionysios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040372
_version_ 1783683190240575488
author Royston, Léna
Royston, Eva
Masouridi-Levrat, Stavroula
Vernaz, Nathalie
Chalandon, Yves
Van Delden, Christian
Neofytos, Dionysios
author_facet Royston, Léna
Royston, Eva
Masouridi-Levrat, Stavroula
Vernaz, Nathalie
Chalandon, Yves
Van Delden, Christian
Neofytos, Dionysios
author_sort Royston, Léna
collection PubMed
description Background: Real-life data on the administration of letermovir as cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center matched cohort study, comparing consecutive high-risk allogeneic HCT recipients (cases) receiving primary prophylaxis with letermovir and untreated matched historical controls, during a study period of 180 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant (cs) CMV infection. Secondary outcomes included duration and costs of CMV-antiviral treatments, hospital resource utilization, hematology and laboratory parameters. Results: Letermovir prophylaxis decreased csCMV infection incidence from 82.7% (controls) to 34.5% (cases; p-value < 0.0001). Controls were more likely to have >1 episode of csCMV infection (59.6%) compared to cases (11.5%; p-value < 0.0001). Letermovir was associated with: shorter overall CMV-associated treatment duration (49 days vs. 77.8 days; p-value: 0.02) and a trend for lower costs of CMV-associated treatments ($4096 vs. $9736; p-value: 0.07) and reduced length of stay (44.8 days vs. 59.8 days; p-value: 0.16). Letermovir administration was associated with significantly shorter duration (27.3 days vs. 57.1 days; p-value: 0.008) and lower costs ($1089 vs. $2281; p-value: 0.008) of valganciclovir treatment. Compared to controls, higher platelet counts were observed in cases (138 G/L vs. 92 G/L; p-value: 0.03) and renal function was improved (94 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 74 mL/min/1.73 m(2); p-value: 0.006). Conclusions: Primary anti-CMV letermovir prophylaxis decreased the incidence of csCMV infection and the administration of CMV-associated treatments and costs, particularly those associated with valganciclovir. An effect of letermovir on platelet reconstitution and renal function of csCMV post-HCT was observed and needs further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80692382021-04-26 Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study Royston, Léna Royston, Eva Masouridi-Levrat, Stavroula Vernaz, Nathalie Chalandon, Yves Van Delden, Christian Neofytos, Dionysios Vaccines (Basel) Article Background: Real-life data on the administration of letermovir as cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center matched cohort study, comparing consecutive high-risk allogeneic HCT recipients (cases) receiving primary prophylaxis with letermovir and untreated matched historical controls, during a study period of 180 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant (cs) CMV infection. Secondary outcomes included duration and costs of CMV-antiviral treatments, hospital resource utilization, hematology and laboratory parameters. Results: Letermovir prophylaxis decreased csCMV infection incidence from 82.7% (controls) to 34.5% (cases; p-value < 0.0001). Controls were more likely to have >1 episode of csCMV infection (59.6%) compared to cases (11.5%; p-value < 0.0001). Letermovir was associated with: shorter overall CMV-associated treatment duration (49 days vs. 77.8 days; p-value: 0.02) and a trend for lower costs of CMV-associated treatments ($4096 vs. $9736; p-value: 0.07) and reduced length of stay (44.8 days vs. 59.8 days; p-value: 0.16). Letermovir administration was associated with significantly shorter duration (27.3 days vs. 57.1 days; p-value: 0.008) and lower costs ($1089 vs. $2281; p-value: 0.008) of valganciclovir treatment. Compared to controls, higher platelet counts were observed in cases (138 G/L vs. 92 G/L; p-value: 0.03) and renal function was improved (94 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 74 mL/min/1.73 m(2); p-value: 0.006). Conclusions: Primary anti-CMV letermovir prophylaxis decreased the incidence of csCMV infection and the administration of CMV-associated treatments and costs, particularly those associated with valganciclovir. An effect of letermovir on platelet reconstitution and renal function of csCMV post-HCT was observed and needs further investigation. MDPI 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8069238/ /pubmed/33921218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040372 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Royston, Léna
Royston, Eva
Masouridi-Levrat, Stavroula
Vernaz, Nathalie
Chalandon, Yves
Van Delden, Christian
Neofytos, Dionysios
Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study
title Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study
title_full Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study
title_fullStr Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study
title_short Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis in High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Matched Cohort Study
title_sort letermovir primary prophylaxis in high-risk hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a matched cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040372
work_keys_str_mv AT roystonlena letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy
AT roystoneva letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy
AT masouridilevratstavroula letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy
AT vernaznathalie letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy
AT chalandonyves letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy
AT vandeldenchristian letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy
AT neofytosdionysios letermovirprimaryprophylaxisinhighriskhematopoieticcelltransplantrecipientsamatchedcohortstudy