Cargando…
Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081612 |
_version_ | 1783683201408958464 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Anne Mertens, Sarah Marie Göstemeyer, Gerd Krois, Joachim Schwendicke, Falk |
author_facet | Müller, Anne Mertens, Sarah Marie Göstemeyer, Gerd Krois, Joachim Schwendicke, Falk |
author_sort | Müller, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayring’s content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers. We identified 36 barriers, conflicting themes or enablers, covering nine of the fourteen domains of the TDF and all three determinants of behavior (COM). Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics were identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting and better patient–provider communication). Barriers related to reliance on AI and responsibility for medical decisions, as well as the explainability of AI and the related option to de-bug AI applications, emerged. Decision-makers and industry may want to consider these aspects to foster implementation of AI in dentistry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8069285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80692852021-04-26 Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study Müller, Anne Mertens, Sarah Marie Göstemeyer, Gerd Krois, Joachim Schwendicke, Falk J Clin Med Article The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayring’s content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers. We identified 36 barriers, conflicting themes or enablers, covering nine of the fourteen domains of the TDF and all three determinants of behavior (COM). Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics were identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting and better patient–provider communication). Barriers related to reliance on AI and responsibility for medical decisions, as well as the explainability of AI and the related option to de-bug AI applications, emerged. Decision-makers and industry may want to consider these aspects to foster implementation of AI in dentistry. MDPI 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8069285/ /pubmed/33920189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081612 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Müller, Anne Mertens, Sarah Marie Göstemeyer, Gerd Krois, Joachim Schwendicke, Falk Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study |
title | Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study |
title_full | Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study |
title_fullStr | Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study |
title_short | Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study |
title_sort | barriers and enablers for artificial intelligence in dental diagnostics: a qualitative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulleranne barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy AT mertenssarahmarie barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy AT gostemeyergerd barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy AT kroisjoachim barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy AT schwendickefalk barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy |