Cargando…

Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study

The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Anne, Mertens, Sarah Marie, Göstemeyer, Gerd, Krois, Joachim, Schwendicke, Falk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081612
_version_ 1783683201408958464
author Müller, Anne
Mertens, Sarah Marie
Göstemeyer, Gerd
Krois, Joachim
Schwendicke, Falk
author_facet Müller, Anne
Mertens, Sarah Marie
Göstemeyer, Gerd
Krois, Joachim
Schwendicke, Falk
author_sort Müller, Anne
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayring’s content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers. We identified 36 barriers, conflicting themes or enablers, covering nine of the fourteen domains of the TDF and all three determinants of behavior (COM). Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics were identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting and better patient–provider communication). Barriers related to reliance on AI and responsibility for medical decisions, as well as the explainability of AI and the related option to de-bug AI applications, emerged. Decision-makers and industry may want to consider these aspects to foster implementation of AI in dentistry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80692852021-04-26 Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study Müller, Anne Mertens, Sarah Marie Göstemeyer, Gerd Krois, Joachim Schwendicke, Falk J Clin Med Article The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayring’s content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers. We identified 36 barriers, conflicting themes or enablers, covering nine of the fourteen domains of the TDF and all three determinants of behavior (COM). Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics were identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting and better patient–provider communication). Barriers related to reliance on AI and responsibility for medical decisions, as well as the explainability of AI and the related option to de-bug AI applications, emerged. Decision-makers and industry may want to consider these aspects to foster implementation of AI in dentistry. MDPI 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8069285/ /pubmed/33920189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081612 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Müller, Anne
Mertens, Sarah Marie
Göstemeyer, Gerd
Krois, Joachim
Schwendicke, Falk
Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_full Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_short Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_sort barriers and enablers for artificial intelligence in dental diagnostics: a qualitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081612
work_keys_str_mv AT mulleranne barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT mertenssarahmarie barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT gostemeyergerd barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT kroisjoachim barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT schwendickefalk barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy