Evolutionary Trajectories and Genomic Divergence in Localized Breast Cancers after Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ipsilateral breast tumor relapse (IBTR) occurs in 5–10% of localized breast cancers (BCs) within 10 years of incidence, despite proper treatment of the primary lesion. However, the clinical consequences of evolutionary trajectories of BC cells and their impact on IBTR remain poorly understood. Here, we conducted a longitudinal genomic analysis of 10 matched localized BC patients with IBTR. Overall, we identified the differences in homologous recombination deficiency, chromosomal instability, and somatic mutation drivers between primary and relapsed lesions. Our analyses highlighted three clonal architectures that shape by distinct mutagenic processes and subclonal diversification during relapse progression. Finally, this study provided a framework, which integrated actionable biomarkers with clonal architectures, towards improvement of future treatment decisions. ABSTRACT: The evolutionary trajectories that drive clinical and therapeutic consequences in localized breast cancers (BCs) with ipsilateral breast tumor relapse (IBTR) remain largely unknown. Analyses of longitudinal paired whole-exome sequencing data from 10 localized BC patients with IBTR reveal that, compared to primary breast tumors, homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, inactivation of the HR pathway, chromosomal instability, and somatic driver mutations are more frequent. Furthermore, three major models of evolution in IBTR are summarized, through which relative contributions of mutational signatures shift, and the subclonal diversity expansions are shown. Optimal treatment regimens are suggested by the clinically relevant molecular features, such as HR deficiency (20%) or specific alterations (30%) with sensitivity to available FDA-approved drugs. Finally, a rationale for the development of the therapeutic management framework is provided. This study sheds light on the complicated evolution patterns in IBTR and has significant clinical implications for future improvement of treatment decisions.