Cargando…

Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant and wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) often show overlapping features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), representing a diagnostic challenge. Deep learning showed promising results for IDH identification in mixed low/high grade glioma populations; however...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasquini, Luca, Napolitano, Antonio, Tagliente, Emanuela, Dellepiane, Francesco, Lucignani, Martina, Vidiri, Antonello, Ranazzi, Giulio, Stoppacciaro, Antonella, Moltoni, Giulia, Nicolai, Matteo, Romano, Andrea, Di Napoli, Alberto, Bozzao, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040290
_version_ 1783683250228559872
author Pasquini, Luca
Napolitano, Antonio
Tagliente, Emanuela
Dellepiane, Francesco
Lucignani, Martina
Vidiri, Antonello
Ranazzi, Giulio
Stoppacciaro, Antonella
Moltoni, Giulia
Nicolai, Matteo
Romano, Andrea
Di Napoli, Alberto
Bozzao, Alessandro
author_facet Pasquini, Luca
Napolitano, Antonio
Tagliente, Emanuela
Dellepiane, Francesco
Lucignani, Martina
Vidiri, Antonello
Ranazzi, Giulio
Stoppacciaro, Antonella
Moltoni, Giulia
Nicolai, Matteo
Romano, Andrea
Di Napoli, Alberto
Bozzao, Alessandro
author_sort Pasquini, Luca
collection PubMed
description Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant and wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) often show overlapping features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), representing a diagnostic challenge. Deep learning showed promising results for IDH identification in mixed low/high grade glioma populations; however, a GBM-specific model is still lacking in the literature. Our aim was to develop a GBM-tailored deep-learning model for IDH prediction by applying convoluted neural networks (CNN) on multiparametric MRI. We selected 100 adult patients with pathologically demonstrated WHO grade IV gliomas and IDH testing. MRI sequences included: MPRAGE, T1, T2, FLAIR, rCBV and ADC. The model consisted of a 4-block 2D CNN, applied to each MRI sequence. Probability of IDH mutation was obtained from the last dense layer of a softmax activation function. Model performance was evaluated in the test cohort considering categorical cross-entropy loss (CCEL) and accuracy. Calculated performance was: rCBV (accuracy 83%, CCEL 0.64), T1 (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.4), FLAIR (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.98), T2 (accuracy 67%, CCEL 2.41), MPRAGE (accuracy 66%, CCEL 2.55). Lower performance was achieved on ADC maps. We present a GBM-specific deep-learning model for IDH mutation prediction, with a maximal accuracy of 83% on rCBV maps. Highest predictivity achieved on perfusion images possibly reflects the known link between IDH and neoangiogenesis through the hypoxia inducible factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80694942021-04-26 Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM Pasquini, Luca Napolitano, Antonio Tagliente, Emanuela Dellepiane, Francesco Lucignani, Martina Vidiri, Antonello Ranazzi, Giulio Stoppacciaro, Antonella Moltoni, Giulia Nicolai, Matteo Romano, Andrea Di Napoli, Alberto Bozzao, Alessandro J Pers Med Article Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant and wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) often show overlapping features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), representing a diagnostic challenge. Deep learning showed promising results for IDH identification in mixed low/high grade glioma populations; however, a GBM-specific model is still lacking in the literature. Our aim was to develop a GBM-tailored deep-learning model for IDH prediction by applying convoluted neural networks (CNN) on multiparametric MRI. We selected 100 adult patients with pathologically demonstrated WHO grade IV gliomas and IDH testing. MRI sequences included: MPRAGE, T1, T2, FLAIR, rCBV and ADC. The model consisted of a 4-block 2D CNN, applied to each MRI sequence. Probability of IDH mutation was obtained from the last dense layer of a softmax activation function. Model performance was evaluated in the test cohort considering categorical cross-entropy loss (CCEL) and accuracy. Calculated performance was: rCBV (accuracy 83%, CCEL 0.64), T1 (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.4), FLAIR (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.98), T2 (accuracy 67%, CCEL 2.41), MPRAGE (accuracy 66%, CCEL 2.55). Lower performance was achieved on ADC maps. We present a GBM-specific deep-learning model for IDH mutation prediction, with a maximal accuracy of 83% on rCBV maps. Highest predictivity achieved on perfusion images possibly reflects the known link between IDH and neoangiogenesis through the hypoxia inducible factor. MDPI 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8069494/ /pubmed/33918828 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040290 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pasquini, Luca
Napolitano, Antonio
Tagliente, Emanuela
Dellepiane, Francesco
Lucignani, Martina
Vidiri, Antonello
Ranazzi, Giulio
Stoppacciaro, Antonella
Moltoni, Giulia
Nicolai, Matteo
Romano, Andrea
Di Napoli, Alberto
Bozzao, Alessandro
Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM
title Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM
title_full Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM
title_fullStr Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM
title_short Deep Learning Can Differentiate IDH-Mutant from IDH-Wild GBM
title_sort deep learning can differentiate idh-mutant from idh-wild gbm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918828
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11040290
work_keys_str_mv AT pasquiniluca deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT napolitanoantonio deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT taglienteemanuela deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT dellepianefrancesco deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT lucignanimartina deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT vidiriantonello deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT ranazzigiulio deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT stoppacciaroantonella deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT moltonigiulia deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT nicolaimatteo deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT romanoandrea deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT dinapolialberto deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm
AT bozzaoalessandro deeplearningcandifferentiateidhmutantfromidhwildgbm