Cargando…
Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
Long-term physical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently being reported. As a result, the focus is turning towards interventions that support recovery after hospitalization. To date, the feasibility of an outpatient program for people recovering from COVID-19 has not been...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083978 |
_version_ | 1783683273108488192 |
---|---|
author | Betschart, Martina Rezek, Spencer Unger, Ines Beyer, Swantje Gisi, David Shannon, Harriet Sieber, Cornel |
author_facet | Betschart, Martina Rezek, Spencer Unger, Ines Beyer, Swantje Gisi, David Shannon, Harriet Sieber, Cornel |
author_sort | Betschart, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Long-term physical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently being reported. As a result, the focus is turning towards interventions that support recovery after hospitalization. To date, the feasibility of an outpatient program for people recovering from COVID-19 has not been investigated. This study presents data for a physiotherapy-led, comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program. Patients were recruited after hospital discharge. Training consisted of twice weekly, interval-based aerobic cycle endurance (ACE) training, followed by resistance training (RT); 60–90 min per session at intensities of 50% peak work rate; education and physical activity coaching were also provided. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment and dropout rates, number of training sessions undertaken, and tolerability for dose and training mode. Of the 65 patients discharged home during the study period, 12 were successfully enrolled onto the program. Three dropouts (25%) were reported after 11–19 sessions. Tolerability of interval-based training was 83% and 100% for exercise duration of ACE and RT, respectively; 92% for training intensity, 83% progressive increase of intensity, and 83% mode in ACE. We tentatively suggest from these preliminary findings that the PR protocol used may be both feasible, and confer benefits to a small subgroup of patients recovering from COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8069591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80695912021-04-26 Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 Betschart, Martina Rezek, Spencer Unger, Ines Beyer, Swantje Gisi, David Shannon, Harriet Sieber, Cornel Int J Environ Res Public Health Brief Report Long-term physical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently being reported. As a result, the focus is turning towards interventions that support recovery after hospitalization. To date, the feasibility of an outpatient program for people recovering from COVID-19 has not been investigated. This study presents data for a physiotherapy-led, comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program. Patients were recruited after hospital discharge. Training consisted of twice weekly, interval-based aerobic cycle endurance (ACE) training, followed by resistance training (RT); 60–90 min per session at intensities of 50% peak work rate; education and physical activity coaching were also provided. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment and dropout rates, number of training sessions undertaken, and tolerability for dose and training mode. Of the 65 patients discharged home during the study period, 12 were successfully enrolled onto the program. Three dropouts (25%) were reported after 11–19 sessions. Tolerability of interval-based training was 83% and 100% for exercise duration of ACE and RT, respectively; 92% for training intensity, 83% progressive increase of intensity, and 83% mode in ACE. We tentatively suggest from these preliminary findings that the PR protocol used may be both feasible, and confer benefits to a small subgroup of patients recovering from COVID-19. MDPI 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8069591/ /pubmed/33918887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083978 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Betschart, Martina Rezek, Spencer Unger, Ines Beyer, Swantje Gisi, David Shannon, Harriet Sieber, Cornel Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 |
title | Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 |
title_full | Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 |
title_short | Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 |
title_sort | feasibility of an outpatient training program after covid-19 |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT betschartmartina feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 AT rezekspencer feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 AT ungerines feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 AT beyerswantje feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 AT gisidavid feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 AT shannonharriet feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 AT siebercornel feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19 |