Cargando…

Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19

Long-term physical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently being reported. As a result, the focus is turning towards interventions that support recovery after hospitalization. To date, the feasibility of an outpatient program for people recovering from COVID-19 has not been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Betschart, Martina, Rezek, Spencer, Unger, Ines, Beyer, Swantje, Gisi, David, Shannon, Harriet, Sieber, Cornel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918887
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083978
_version_ 1783683273108488192
author Betschart, Martina
Rezek, Spencer
Unger, Ines
Beyer, Swantje
Gisi, David
Shannon, Harriet
Sieber, Cornel
author_facet Betschart, Martina
Rezek, Spencer
Unger, Ines
Beyer, Swantje
Gisi, David
Shannon, Harriet
Sieber, Cornel
author_sort Betschart, Martina
collection PubMed
description Long-term physical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently being reported. As a result, the focus is turning towards interventions that support recovery after hospitalization. To date, the feasibility of an outpatient program for people recovering from COVID-19 has not been investigated. This study presents data for a physiotherapy-led, comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program. Patients were recruited after hospital discharge. Training consisted of twice weekly, interval-based aerobic cycle endurance (ACE) training, followed by resistance training (RT); 60–90 min per session at intensities of 50% peak work rate; education and physical activity coaching were also provided. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment and dropout rates, number of training sessions undertaken, and tolerability for dose and training mode. Of the 65 patients discharged home during the study period, 12 were successfully enrolled onto the program. Three dropouts (25%) were reported after 11–19 sessions. Tolerability of interval-based training was 83% and 100% for exercise duration of ACE and RT, respectively; 92% for training intensity, 83% progressive increase of intensity, and 83% mode in ACE. We tentatively suggest from these preliminary findings that the PR protocol used may be both feasible, and confer benefits to a small subgroup of patients recovering from COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80695912021-04-26 Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19 Betschart, Martina Rezek, Spencer Unger, Ines Beyer, Swantje Gisi, David Shannon, Harriet Sieber, Cornel Int J Environ Res Public Health Brief Report Long-term physical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently being reported. As a result, the focus is turning towards interventions that support recovery after hospitalization. To date, the feasibility of an outpatient program for people recovering from COVID-19 has not been investigated. This study presents data for a physiotherapy-led, comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program. Patients were recruited after hospital discharge. Training consisted of twice weekly, interval-based aerobic cycle endurance (ACE) training, followed by resistance training (RT); 60–90 min per session at intensities of 50% peak work rate; education and physical activity coaching were also provided. Feasibility outcomes included: recruitment and dropout rates, number of training sessions undertaken, and tolerability for dose and training mode. Of the 65 patients discharged home during the study period, 12 were successfully enrolled onto the program. Three dropouts (25%) were reported after 11–19 sessions. Tolerability of interval-based training was 83% and 100% for exercise duration of ACE and RT, respectively; 92% for training intensity, 83% progressive increase of intensity, and 83% mode in ACE. We tentatively suggest from these preliminary findings that the PR protocol used may be both feasible, and confer benefits to a small subgroup of patients recovering from COVID-19. MDPI 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8069591/ /pubmed/33918887 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083978 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Betschart, Martina
Rezek, Spencer
Unger, Ines
Beyer, Swantje
Gisi, David
Shannon, Harriet
Sieber, Cornel
Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
title Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
title_full Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
title_fullStr Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
title_short Feasibility of an Outpatient Training Program after COVID-19
title_sort feasibility of an outpatient training program after covid-19
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918887
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083978
work_keys_str_mv AT betschartmartina feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19
AT rezekspencer feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19
AT ungerines feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19
AT beyerswantje feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19
AT gisidavid feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19
AT shannonharriet feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19
AT siebercornel feasibilityofanoutpatienttrainingprogramaftercovid19