Cargando…

Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study

The fracture resistance of computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing CAD/CAM fabricated implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) is affected by the size/dimension and the micro cracks produced from diamond burs during the milling process. The present in vitro study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshiddi, Ibraheem F., Habib, Syed Rashid, Zafar, Muhammad Sohail, Bajunaid, Salwa, Labban, Nawaf, Alsarhan, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082259
_version_ 1783683316916944896
author Alshiddi, Ibraheem F.
Habib, Syed Rashid
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
Bajunaid, Salwa
Labban, Nawaf
Alsarhan, Mohammed
author_facet Alshiddi, Ibraheem F.
Habib, Syed Rashid
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
Bajunaid, Salwa
Labban, Nawaf
Alsarhan, Mohammed
author_sort Alshiddi, Ibraheem F.
collection PubMed
description The fracture resistance of computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing CAD/CAM fabricated implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) is affected by the size/dimension and the micro cracks produced from diamond burs during the milling process. The present in vitro study investigated the fracture load for different cross-sectional dimensions of connector sites of implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) with different cantilever lengths (load point). A total of 48 ISCZFs (Cercon, Degudent; Dentsply, Deutschland, Germany) were fabricated by CAD/CAM and divided into four groups based on cantilever length and reinforcement of distal-abutment: Group A: 9 mm cantilever; Group B: 9 mm cantilever with reinforced distal-abutment; Group C: 12 mm cantilever; Group D: 12 mm cantilever with reinforced distal-abutment (n = 12). The ISCZFs were loaded using a universal testing machine for recording the fracture load. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Tukey’s test were used for the statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Significant variations were found between the fracture loads of the four ISCZFs (p = 0.000); Group-C and B were found with the weakest and the strongest distal cantilever frameworks with fracture load of 670.39 ± 130.96 N and 1137.86 ± 127.85 N, respectively. The mean difference of the fracture load between groups A (810.49 + 137.579 N) and B (1137.86 ± 127.85 N) and between C (670.39 ± 130.96 N) and D (914.58 + 149.635 N) was statistically significant (p = 0.000). Significant variations in the fracture load between the ISCZFs with different cantilever lengths and thicknesses of the distal abutments were found. Increasing the thickness of the distal abutment only by 0.5 mm reinforces the distal abutments by significantly increasing the fracture load of the ISCZFs. Therefore, an increase in the thickness of the distal abutments is recommended in patients seeking implant-supported distal cantilever fixed prostheses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80697782021-04-26 Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study Alshiddi, Ibraheem F. Habib, Syed Rashid Zafar, Muhammad Sohail Bajunaid, Salwa Labban, Nawaf Alsarhan, Mohammed Molecules Article The fracture resistance of computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing CAD/CAM fabricated implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) is affected by the size/dimension and the micro cracks produced from diamond burs during the milling process. The present in vitro study investigated the fracture load for different cross-sectional dimensions of connector sites of implant-supported cantilever zirconia frameworks (ISCZFs) with different cantilever lengths (load point). A total of 48 ISCZFs (Cercon, Degudent; Dentsply, Deutschland, Germany) were fabricated by CAD/CAM and divided into four groups based on cantilever length and reinforcement of distal-abutment: Group A: 9 mm cantilever; Group B: 9 mm cantilever with reinforced distal-abutment; Group C: 12 mm cantilever; Group D: 12 mm cantilever with reinforced distal-abutment (n = 12). The ISCZFs were loaded using a universal testing machine for recording the fracture load. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Tukey’s test were used for the statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Significant variations were found between the fracture loads of the four ISCZFs (p = 0.000); Group-C and B were found with the weakest and the strongest distal cantilever frameworks with fracture load of 670.39 ± 130.96 N and 1137.86 ± 127.85 N, respectively. The mean difference of the fracture load between groups A (810.49 + 137.579 N) and B (1137.86 ± 127.85 N) and between C (670.39 ± 130.96 N) and D (914.58 + 149.635 N) was statistically significant (p = 0.000). Significant variations in the fracture load between the ISCZFs with different cantilever lengths and thicknesses of the distal abutments were found. Increasing the thickness of the distal abutment only by 0.5 mm reinforces the distal abutments by significantly increasing the fracture load of the ISCZFs. Therefore, an increase in the thickness of the distal abutments is recommended in patients seeking implant-supported distal cantilever fixed prostheses. MDPI 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8069778/ /pubmed/33924733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082259 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alshiddi, Ibraheem F.
Habib, Syed Rashid
Zafar, Muhammad Sohail
Bajunaid, Salwa
Labban, Nawaf
Alsarhan, Mohammed
Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study
title Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study
title_full Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study
title_short Fracture Load of CAD/CAM Fabricated Cantilever Implant-Supported Zirconia Framework: An In Vitro Study
title_sort fracture load of cad/cam fabricated cantilever implant-supported zirconia framework: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082259
work_keys_str_mv AT alshiddiibraheemf fractureloadofcadcamfabricatedcantileverimplantsupportedzirconiaframeworkaninvitrostudy
AT habibsyedrashid fractureloadofcadcamfabricatedcantileverimplantsupportedzirconiaframeworkaninvitrostudy
AT zafarmuhammadsohail fractureloadofcadcamfabricatedcantileverimplantsupportedzirconiaframeworkaninvitrostudy
AT bajunaidsalwa fractureloadofcadcamfabricatedcantileverimplantsupportedzirconiaframeworkaninvitrostudy
AT labbannawaf fractureloadofcadcamfabricatedcantileverimplantsupportedzirconiaframeworkaninvitrostudy
AT alsarhanmohammed fractureloadofcadcamfabricatedcantileverimplantsupportedzirconiaframeworkaninvitrostudy