Cargando…

Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis

The purpose of our study was to analyze the graft contact stress at the tunnel after transtibial single-bundle (SB) and transportal double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. After transtibial SB (20 cases) and transportal DB (29 cases) ACL reconstruction, the three-dimensio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae Gyoon, Kang, Kyoung Tak, Wang, Joon Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081625
_version_ 1783683347207159808
author Kim, Jae Gyoon
Kang, Kyoung Tak
Wang, Joon Ho
author_facet Kim, Jae Gyoon
Kang, Kyoung Tak
Wang, Joon Ho
author_sort Kim, Jae Gyoon
collection PubMed
description The purpose of our study was to analyze the graft contact stress at the tunnel after transtibial single-bundle (SB) and transportal double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. After transtibial SB (20 cases) and transportal DB (29 cases) ACL reconstruction, the three-dimensional image of each patient made by postoperative computed tomography was adjusted to the validation model of a normal knee and simulated SB and DB ACL reconstructions were created based on the average tunnel position and direction of each group. We also measured graft and contact stresses at the tunnel after a 134 N anterior load from 0° to 90° flexion. The graft and contact stresses became the greatest at 30° and 0° flexion, respectively. The total graft and contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction were greater than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the graft and contact stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction were less than those after SB ACL reconstruction. In conclusion, the total graft and total contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction are higher than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction are about half of those after SB ACL reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80699072021-04-26 Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis Kim, Jae Gyoon Kang, Kyoung Tak Wang, Joon Ho J Clin Med Article The purpose of our study was to analyze the graft contact stress at the tunnel after transtibial single-bundle (SB) and transportal double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. After transtibial SB (20 cases) and transportal DB (29 cases) ACL reconstruction, the three-dimensional image of each patient made by postoperative computed tomography was adjusted to the validation model of a normal knee and simulated SB and DB ACL reconstructions were created based on the average tunnel position and direction of each group. We also measured graft and contact stresses at the tunnel after a 134 N anterior load from 0° to 90° flexion. The graft and contact stresses became the greatest at 30° and 0° flexion, respectively. The total graft and contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction were greater than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the graft and contact stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction were less than those after SB ACL reconstruction. In conclusion, the total graft and total contact stresses after DB ACL reconstruction are higher than those after SB ACL reconstruction from 0° to 30° and 0° to 90° knee flexion, respectively. However, the stresses of each graft after DB ACL reconstruction are about half of those after SB ACL reconstruction. MDPI 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8069907/ /pubmed/33921263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081625 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Jae Gyoon
Kang, Kyoung Tak
Wang, Joon Ho
Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis
title Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis
title_full Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis
title_short Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis
title_sort biomechanical difference between conventional transtibial single-bundle and anatomical transportal double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three-dimensional finite element model analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081625
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaegyoon biomechanicaldifferencebetweenconventionaltranstibialsinglebundleandanatomicaltransportaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingthreedimensionalfiniteelementmodelanalysis
AT kangkyoungtak biomechanicaldifferencebetweenconventionaltranstibialsinglebundleandanatomicaltransportaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingthreedimensionalfiniteelementmodelanalysis
AT wangjoonho biomechanicaldifferencebetweenconventionaltranstibialsinglebundleandanatomicaltransportaldoublebundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingthreedimensionalfiniteelementmodelanalysis