Cargando…

Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review

Gait analysis has traditionally been carried out in a laboratory environment using expensive equipment, but, recently, reliable, affordable, and wearable sensors have enabled integration into clinical applications as well as use during activities of daily living. Real-time gait analysis is key to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasanth, Hari, Caban, Miroslav, Keller, Urs, Courtine, Grégoire, Ijspeert, Auke, Vallery, Heike, von Zitzewitz, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082727
_version_ 1783683359911706624
author Prasanth, Hari
Caban, Miroslav
Keller, Urs
Courtine, Grégoire
Ijspeert, Auke
Vallery, Heike
von Zitzewitz, Joachim
author_facet Prasanth, Hari
Caban, Miroslav
Keller, Urs
Courtine, Grégoire
Ijspeert, Auke
Vallery, Heike
von Zitzewitz, Joachim
author_sort Prasanth, Hari
collection PubMed
description Gait analysis has traditionally been carried out in a laboratory environment using expensive equipment, but, recently, reliable, affordable, and wearable sensors have enabled integration into clinical applications as well as use during activities of daily living. Real-time gait analysis is key to the development of gait rehabilitation techniques and assistive devices such as neuroprostheses. This article presents a systematic review of wearable sensors and techniques used in real-time gait analysis, and their application to pathological gait. From four major scientific databases, we identified 1262 articles of which 113 were analyzed in full-text. We found that heel strike and toe off are the most sought-after gait events. Inertial measurement units (IMU) are the most widely used wearable sensors and the shank and foot are the preferred placements. Insole pressure sensors are the most common sensors for ground-truth validation for IMU-based gait detection. Rule-based techniques relying on threshold or peak detection are the most widely used gait detection method. The heterogeneity of evaluation criteria prevented quantitative performance comparison of all methods. Although most studies predicted that the proposed methods would work on pathological gait, less than one third were validated on such data. Clinical applications of gait detection algorithms were considered, and we recommend a combination of IMU and rule-based methods as an optimal solution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8069962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80699622021-04-26 Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review Prasanth, Hari Caban, Miroslav Keller, Urs Courtine, Grégoire Ijspeert, Auke Vallery, Heike von Zitzewitz, Joachim Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review Gait analysis has traditionally been carried out in a laboratory environment using expensive equipment, but, recently, reliable, affordable, and wearable sensors have enabled integration into clinical applications as well as use during activities of daily living. Real-time gait analysis is key to the development of gait rehabilitation techniques and assistive devices such as neuroprostheses. This article presents a systematic review of wearable sensors and techniques used in real-time gait analysis, and their application to pathological gait. From four major scientific databases, we identified 1262 articles of which 113 were analyzed in full-text. We found that heel strike and toe off are the most sought-after gait events. Inertial measurement units (IMU) are the most widely used wearable sensors and the shank and foot are the preferred placements. Insole pressure sensors are the most common sensors for ground-truth validation for IMU-based gait detection. Rule-based techniques relying on threshold or peak detection are the most widely used gait detection method. The heterogeneity of evaluation criteria prevented quantitative performance comparison of all methods. Although most studies predicted that the proposed methods would work on pathological gait, less than one third were validated on such data. Clinical applications of gait detection algorithms were considered, and we recommend a combination of IMU and rule-based methods as an optimal solution. MDPI 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8069962/ /pubmed/33924403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082727 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Prasanth, Hari
Caban, Miroslav
Keller, Urs
Courtine, Grégoire
Ijspeert, Auke
Vallery, Heike
von Zitzewitz, Joachim
Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review
title Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review
title_full Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review
title_short Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review
title_sort wearable sensor-based real-time gait detection: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8069962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082727
work_keys_str_mv AT prasanthhari wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview
AT cabanmiroslav wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview
AT kellerurs wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview
AT courtinegregoire wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview
AT ijspeertauke wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview
AT valleryheike wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview
AT vonzitzewitzjoachim wearablesensorbasedrealtimegaitdetectionasystematicreview