Cargando…
The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
The sedation outcomes associated with dexmedetomidine compared with those of propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) remains unclear. Electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, Medline, and Scopus) were searched from inception to 25 December 2020 for ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081585 |
_version_ | 1783683410982600704 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yi-Ting Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Wu, Kuan-Yu Chang, Ying-Jen Chiang, Min-Hsien Chen, I-Wen Liao, Shu-Wei Hung, Kuo-Chuan |
author_facet | Chen, Yi-Ting Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Wu, Kuan-Yu Chang, Ying-Jen Chiang, Min-Hsien Chen, I-Wen Liao, Shu-Wei Hung, Kuo-Chuan |
author_sort | Chen, Yi-Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sedation outcomes associated with dexmedetomidine compared with those of propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) remains unclear. Electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, Medline, and Scopus) were searched from inception to 25 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the sedation outcomes with dexmedetomidine or propofol in adult patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) receiving DISE. The primary outcome was the difference in minimum oxygen saturation (mSaO2). Five RCTs (270 participants) published between 2015 and 2020 were included for analysis. Compared with dexmedetomidine, propofol was associated with lower levels of mSaO2 (mean difference (MD) = −7.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) −12.04 to −2.44; 230 participants) and satisfaction among endoscopic performers (standardized MD = −2.43, 95% CI −3.61 to −1.26; 128 participants) as well as a higher risk of hypoxemia (relative ratios = 1.82, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.76; 82 participants). However, propofol provided a shorter time to fall asleep and a lower risk of failed sedation compared with dexmedetomidine. No significant difference was found in other outcomes. Compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine exhibited fewer adverse effects on respiratory function and provided a higher level of satisfaction among endoscopic performers but was associated with an elevated risk of failed sedation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8070183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80701832021-04-26 The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Chen, Yi-Ting Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Wu, Kuan-Yu Chang, Ying-Jen Chiang, Min-Hsien Chen, I-Wen Liao, Shu-Wei Hung, Kuo-Chuan J Clin Med Review The sedation outcomes associated with dexmedetomidine compared with those of propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) remains unclear. Electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, Medline, and Scopus) were searched from inception to 25 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the sedation outcomes with dexmedetomidine or propofol in adult patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) receiving DISE. The primary outcome was the difference in minimum oxygen saturation (mSaO2). Five RCTs (270 participants) published between 2015 and 2020 were included for analysis. Compared with dexmedetomidine, propofol was associated with lower levels of mSaO2 (mean difference (MD) = −7.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) −12.04 to −2.44; 230 participants) and satisfaction among endoscopic performers (standardized MD = −2.43, 95% CI −3.61 to −1.26; 128 participants) as well as a higher risk of hypoxemia (relative ratios = 1.82, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.76; 82 participants). However, propofol provided a shorter time to fall asleep and a lower risk of failed sedation compared with dexmedetomidine. No significant difference was found in other outcomes. Compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine exhibited fewer adverse effects on respiratory function and provided a higher level of satisfaction among endoscopic performers but was associated with an elevated risk of failed sedation. MDPI 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8070183/ /pubmed/33918644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081585 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chen, Yi-Ting Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Wu, Kuan-Yu Chang, Ying-Jen Chiang, Min-Hsien Chen, I-Wen Liao, Shu-Wei Hung, Kuo-Chuan The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | use of propofol versus dexmedetomidine for patients receiving drug-induced sleep endoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyiting theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT suncheukkwan theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wukuanyu theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT changyingjen theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chiangminhsien theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cheniwen theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liaoshuwei theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hungkuochuan theuseofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenyiting useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT suncheukkwan useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wukuanyu useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT changyingjen useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chiangminhsien useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cheniwen useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liaoshuwei useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hungkuochuan useofpropofolversusdexmedetomidineforpatientsreceivingdruginducedsleependoscopyametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |