Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting

The Modified Self-Assessment (MSA) and Present Self-Assessment (PSA) forms are questionnaires used to prioritize the risk of infection of health workers exposed to tuberculosis (TB) in Srinagarind Hospital in Thailand. As MSA was developed from PSA, the validity and reliability of MSA need to be ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirinapakul, Piyapong, Chaiear, Naesinee, Krisorn, Phanumas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083981
_version_ 1783683468283084800
author Sirinapakul, Piyapong
Chaiear, Naesinee
Krisorn, Phanumas
author_facet Sirinapakul, Piyapong
Chaiear, Naesinee
Krisorn, Phanumas
author_sort Sirinapakul, Piyapong
collection PubMed
description The Modified Self-Assessment (MSA) and Present Self-Assessment (PSA) forms are questionnaires used to prioritize the risk of infection of health workers exposed to tuberculosis (TB) in Srinagarind Hospital in Thailand. As MSA was developed from PSA, the validity and reliability of MSA need to be assessed. The research aim is to examine the content validity of MSA and to assess the respective reliability of MSA and PSA vis-à-vis expert opinion. Seven experts determined the content validity index (CVI) of MSA. MSA and PSA were used to prioritize the TB contact of 108 subjects, and we compared the result with the risk assessed by the experts. The respective Kappa agreements between MSA and PSA and the experts were used to assess reliability. The result of the content validity index revealed that MSA had I-CVI > 0.83 for all questions and an S-CVI/Ave above 0.90 for all factors. The Kappa agreement of contact priority between MSA and the experts was 0.80; it was 0.58 between PSA and the experts. MSA can, thus, be used to prioritize contact with tuberculosis in Srinagarind Hospital. MSA is a valid risk communication tool for aerosol-generating procedures. Further study should be conducted in other hospitals, and the number of participants should be increased in order to come to a concrete result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8070430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80704302021-04-26 Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting Sirinapakul, Piyapong Chaiear, Naesinee Krisorn, Phanumas Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Modified Self-Assessment (MSA) and Present Self-Assessment (PSA) forms are questionnaires used to prioritize the risk of infection of health workers exposed to tuberculosis (TB) in Srinagarind Hospital in Thailand. As MSA was developed from PSA, the validity and reliability of MSA need to be assessed. The research aim is to examine the content validity of MSA and to assess the respective reliability of MSA and PSA vis-à-vis expert opinion. Seven experts determined the content validity index (CVI) of MSA. MSA and PSA were used to prioritize the TB contact of 108 subjects, and we compared the result with the risk assessed by the experts. The respective Kappa agreements between MSA and PSA and the experts were used to assess reliability. The result of the content validity index revealed that MSA had I-CVI > 0.83 for all questions and an S-CVI/Ave above 0.90 for all factors. The Kappa agreement of contact priority between MSA and the experts was 0.80; it was 0.58 between PSA and the experts. MSA can, thus, be used to prioritize contact with tuberculosis in Srinagarind Hospital. MSA is a valid risk communication tool for aerosol-generating procedures. Further study should be conducted in other hospitals, and the number of participants should be increased in order to come to a concrete result. MDPI 2021-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8070430/ /pubmed/33918945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083981 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sirinapakul, Piyapong
Chaiear, Naesinee
Krisorn, Phanumas
Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting
title Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting
title_full Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting
title_short Validity and Reliability of Self-Assessment Tool for Risk Prioritization Following Exposure to Tuberculosis in a Hospital Setting
title_sort validity and reliability of self-assessment tool for risk prioritization following exposure to tuberculosis in a hospital setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33918945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083981
work_keys_str_mv AT sirinapakulpiyapong validityandreliabilityofselfassessmenttoolforriskprioritizationfollowingexposuretotuberculosisinahospitalsetting
AT chaiearnaesinee validityandreliabilityofselfassessmenttoolforriskprioritizationfollowingexposuretotuberculosisinahospitalsetting
AT krisornphanumas validityandreliabilityofselfassessmenttoolforriskprioritizationfollowingexposuretotuberculosisinahospitalsetting