Cargando…

Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of cognition is crucial in brain tumor care, and clinical outcome along this axis is frequently neglected. As a result, a patient’s quality of life seems more impacted than usually reported in clinical series. With this article, we review the current state of affairs and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gondar, Renato, Patet, Gildas, Schaller, Karl, Meling, Torstein R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081846
_version_ 1783683480164499456
author Gondar, Renato
Patet, Gildas
Schaller, Karl
Meling, Torstein R.
author_facet Gondar, Renato
Patet, Gildas
Schaller, Karl
Meling, Torstein R.
author_sort Gondar, Renato
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of cognition is crucial in brain tumor care, and clinical outcome along this axis is frequently neglected. As a result, a patient’s quality of life seems more impacted than usually reported in clinical series. With this article, we review the current state of affairs and search for patient- and meningioma-related outcome predictors. We found a great variety in the number and types of neuropsychological tests used and in the dimensions of cognition studied. Furthermore, data mostly originate from a selected part of the globe and therefore may not reflect a global reality. Treatment has an early cognitive impact in the majority of meningioma patients. Further long-term conclusions are precluded by a mean follow-up time shorter than one year. Anticipating cognition outcomes prior to, during, and after treatment of meningiomas remains difficult. Future research should aim for a reliable and worldwide reproducible standard battery of tests. ABSTRACT: Clinical outcomes after surgery for intracranial meningiomas might be overvalued as cognitive dimensions and quality of life are probably underreported. This review aims to summarize the current state of cognitive screening and treatment-related outcomes after meningioma surgery. We present a systematic review (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015-based) of cognitive outcomes after intracranial meningioma surgery. A total of 1572 patients (range 9–261) with a mean age of 58.4 years (range 23–87), and predominantly female (n = 1084, 68.9%) were identified. Mean follow-up time after treatment was 0.86 ± 0.3 years. Neuropsychological assessment was very heterogeneous, but five dimensions of cognition were described: memory (19/22); attention (18/22); executive functions (17/22); language (11/22); flexibility (11/22 studies). Cognitive abilities were impaired in 18 studies (81.8%), but only 1 showed deterioration in all dimensions simultaneously. Memory was the most affected. with significant post-therapy impairment in 9 studies (40.9%). Postoperatively, only 4 studies (18.2%) showed improvement in at least one dimension. Meningioma patients had significantly lower cognitive scores when compared to healthy subjects. Surgery and radiotherapy for meningiomas were associated with cognitive impairment, probably followed by a partial recovery. Cognition is poorly defined, and the assessment tools employed lack standardization. Cognitive impairment is probably underreported in meningioma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8070481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80704812021-04-26 Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review Gondar, Renato Patet, Gildas Schaller, Karl Meling, Torstein R. Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of cognition is crucial in brain tumor care, and clinical outcome along this axis is frequently neglected. As a result, a patient’s quality of life seems more impacted than usually reported in clinical series. With this article, we review the current state of affairs and search for patient- and meningioma-related outcome predictors. We found a great variety in the number and types of neuropsychological tests used and in the dimensions of cognition studied. Furthermore, data mostly originate from a selected part of the globe and therefore may not reflect a global reality. Treatment has an early cognitive impact in the majority of meningioma patients. Further long-term conclusions are precluded by a mean follow-up time shorter than one year. Anticipating cognition outcomes prior to, during, and after treatment of meningiomas remains difficult. Future research should aim for a reliable and worldwide reproducible standard battery of tests. ABSTRACT: Clinical outcomes after surgery for intracranial meningiomas might be overvalued as cognitive dimensions and quality of life are probably underreported. This review aims to summarize the current state of cognitive screening and treatment-related outcomes after meningioma surgery. We present a systematic review (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015-based) of cognitive outcomes after intracranial meningioma surgery. A total of 1572 patients (range 9–261) with a mean age of 58.4 years (range 23–87), and predominantly female (n = 1084, 68.9%) were identified. Mean follow-up time after treatment was 0.86 ± 0.3 years. Neuropsychological assessment was very heterogeneous, but five dimensions of cognition were described: memory (19/22); attention (18/22); executive functions (17/22); language (11/22); flexibility (11/22 studies). Cognitive abilities were impaired in 18 studies (81.8%), but only 1 showed deterioration in all dimensions simultaneously. Memory was the most affected. with significant post-therapy impairment in 9 studies (40.9%). Postoperatively, only 4 studies (18.2%) showed improvement in at least one dimension. Meningioma patients had significantly lower cognitive scores when compared to healthy subjects. Surgery and radiotherapy for meningiomas were associated with cognitive impairment, probably followed by a partial recovery. Cognition is poorly defined, and the assessment tools employed lack standardization. Cognitive impairment is probably underreported in meningioma patients. MDPI 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8070481/ /pubmed/33924372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081846 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Gondar, Renato
Patet, Gildas
Schaller, Karl
Meling, Torstein R.
Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review
title Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review
title_full Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review
title_fullStr Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review
title_short Meningiomas and Cognitive Impairment after Treatment: A Systematic and Narrative Review
title_sort meningiomas and cognitive impairment after treatment: a systematic and narrative review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081846
work_keys_str_mv AT gondarrenato meningiomasandcognitiveimpairmentaftertreatmentasystematicandnarrativereview
AT patetgildas meningiomasandcognitiveimpairmentaftertreatmentasystematicandnarrativereview
AT schallerkarl meningiomasandcognitiveimpairmentaftertreatmentasystematicandnarrativereview
AT melingtorsteinr meningiomasandcognitiveimpairmentaftertreatmentasystematicandnarrativereview