Cargando…
Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites
Pulsed Thermography (PT) data are usually affected by noise and as such most of the research effort in the last few years has been directed towards the development of advanced signal processing methods to improve defect detection. Among the numerous techniques that have been proposed, principal comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082682 |
_version_ | 1783683513645531136 |
---|---|
author | Ebrahimi, Samira Fleuret, Julien Klein, Matthieu Théroux, Louis-Daniel Georges, Marc Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente Maldague, Xavier |
author_facet | Ebrahimi, Samira Fleuret, Julien Klein, Matthieu Théroux, Louis-Daniel Georges, Marc Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente Maldague, Xavier |
author_sort | Ebrahimi, Samira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulsed Thermography (PT) data are usually affected by noise and as such most of the research effort in the last few years has been directed towards the development of advanced signal processing methods to improve defect detection. Among the numerous techniques that have been proposed, principal component thermography (PCT)—based on principal component analysis (PCA)—is one of the most effective in terms of defect contrast enhancement and data compression. However, it is well-known that PCA can be significantly affected in the presence of corrupted data (e.g., noise and outliers). Robust PCA (RPCA) has been recently proposed as an alternative statistical method that handles noisy data more properly by decomposing the input data into a low-rank matrix and a sparse matrix. We propose to process PT data by RPCA instead of PCA in order to improve defect detectability. The performance of the resulting approach, Robust Principal Component Thermography (RPCT)—based on RPCA, was evaluated with respect to PCT—based on PCA, using a CFRP sample containing artificially produced defects. We compared results quantitatively based on two metrics, Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), for defect detection capabilities, and the Jaccard similarity coefficient, for defect segmentation potential. CNR results were on average 40% higher for RPCT than for PCT, and the Jaccard index was slightly higher for RPCT (0.7395) than for PCT (0.7010). In terms of computational time, however, PCT was 11.5 times faster than RPCT. Further investigations are needed to assess RPCT performance on a wider range of materials and to optimize computational time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8070624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80706242021-04-26 Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites Ebrahimi, Samira Fleuret, Julien Klein, Matthieu Théroux, Louis-Daniel Georges, Marc Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente Maldague, Xavier Sensors (Basel) Article Pulsed Thermography (PT) data are usually affected by noise and as such most of the research effort in the last few years has been directed towards the development of advanced signal processing methods to improve defect detection. Among the numerous techniques that have been proposed, principal component thermography (PCT)—based on principal component analysis (PCA)—is one of the most effective in terms of defect contrast enhancement and data compression. However, it is well-known that PCA can be significantly affected in the presence of corrupted data (e.g., noise and outliers). Robust PCA (RPCA) has been recently proposed as an alternative statistical method that handles noisy data more properly by decomposing the input data into a low-rank matrix and a sparse matrix. We propose to process PT data by RPCA instead of PCA in order to improve defect detectability. The performance of the resulting approach, Robust Principal Component Thermography (RPCT)—based on RPCA, was evaluated with respect to PCT—based on PCA, using a CFRP sample containing artificially produced defects. We compared results quantitatively based on two metrics, Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), for defect detection capabilities, and the Jaccard similarity coefficient, for defect segmentation potential. CNR results were on average 40% higher for RPCT than for PCT, and the Jaccard index was slightly higher for RPCT (0.7395) than for PCT (0.7010). In terms of computational time, however, PCT was 11.5 times faster than RPCT. Further investigations are needed to assess RPCT performance on a wider range of materials and to optimize computational time. MDPI 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8070624/ /pubmed/33920261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082682 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ebrahimi, Samira Fleuret, Julien Klein, Matthieu Théroux, Louis-Daniel Georges, Marc Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente Maldague, Xavier Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites |
title | Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites |
title_full | Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites |
title_fullStr | Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites |
title_full_unstemmed | Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites |
title_short | Robust Principal Component Thermography for Defect Detection in Composites |
title_sort | robust principal component thermography for defect detection in composites |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebrahimisamira robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites AT fleuretjulien robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites AT kleinmatthieu robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites AT therouxlouisdaniel robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites AT georgesmarc robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites AT ibarracastanedoclemente robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites AT maldaguexavier robustprincipalcomponentthermographyfordefectdetectionincomposites |