Cargando…
Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is advised for right ventricular (RV) assessment. Data regarding the optimal acquisition settings and optimization are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reproducibility and validation of 3DE for RV volume and function assessment, using cardi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040699 |
_version_ | 1783683555990175744 |
---|---|
author | De Potter, Tom Weytjens, Caroline Motoc, Andreea Luchian, Maria Luiza Scheirlynck, Esther Roosens, Bram Tanaka, Kaoru Houard, Laura Droogmans, Steven Cosyns, Bernard |
author_facet | De Potter, Tom Weytjens, Caroline Motoc, Andreea Luchian, Maria Luiza Scheirlynck, Esther Roosens, Bram Tanaka, Kaoru Houard, Laura Droogmans, Steven Cosyns, Bernard |
author_sort | De Potter, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is advised for right ventricular (RV) assessment. Data regarding the optimal acquisition settings and optimization are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reproducibility and validation of 3DE for RV volume and function assessment, using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as gold standard. Thirty healthy volunteers and 36 consecutive patients were prospectively included. CMR was performed in the latter. Standard apical four-chamber view (A4CV), focused A4CV and modified A4CV were used for 3DE RV acquisition. Feasibility (and the effect of changes in settings) was evaluated. Intra and interobserver analyses were performed by three observers (expert vs. novice). RV parameters by echocardiography were compared to CMR. Feasibility of acquisition was 16.7% for A4CV, 80.0% for focused A4CV and 16.7% for modified A4CV. Changes in settings had no significant influence on feasibility and further analysis. Intraobserver variability was good in both expert and novice, interobserver variability was good between experienced observers. Compared to CMR, 3DE volumes were significantly lower with fair to moderate correlation (EDV: 91.1 ± 24.4 mL vs. 144.3 ± 43.0 mL (p < 0.001), r = 0.653 and ESV: 48.1 ± 16.4 mL vs. 60.4 ± 21.2 mL (p < 0.001), r = 0.530, by multi-beat 3DE and CMR respectively). These findings suggest that standardization is needed in order to implement this technique in clinical practice, thus further studies are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8070805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80708052021-04-26 Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography De Potter, Tom Weytjens, Caroline Motoc, Andreea Luchian, Maria Luiza Scheirlynck, Esther Roosens, Bram Tanaka, Kaoru Houard, Laura Droogmans, Steven Cosyns, Bernard Diagnostics (Basel) Article Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is advised for right ventricular (RV) assessment. Data regarding the optimal acquisition settings and optimization are still scarce. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reproducibility and validation of 3DE for RV volume and function assessment, using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as gold standard. Thirty healthy volunteers and 36 consecutive patients were prospectively included. CMR was performed in the latter. Standard apical four-chamber view (A4CV), focused A4CV and modified A4CV were used for 3DE RV acquisition. Feasibility (and the effect of changes in settings) was evaluated. Intra and interobserver analyses were performed by three observers (expert vs. novice). RV parameters by echocardiography were compared to CMR. Feasibility of acquisition was 16.7% for A4CV, 80.0% for focused A4CV and 16.7% for modified A4CV. Changes in settings had no significant influence on feasibility and further analysis. Intraobserver variability was good in both expert and novice, interobserver variability was good between experienced observers. Compared to CMR, 3DE volumes were significantly lower with fair to moderate correlation (EDV: 91.1 ± 24.4 mL vs. 144.3 ± 43.0 mL (p < 0.001), r = 0.653 and ESV: 48.1 ± 16.4 mL vs. 60.4 ± 21.2 mL (p < 0.001), r = 0.530, by multi-beat 3DE and CMR respectively). These findings suggest that standardization is needed in order to implement this technique in clinical practice, thus further studies are required. MDPI 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8070805/ /pubmed/33919794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040699 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Potter, Tom Weytjens, Caroline Motoc, Andreea Luchian, Maria Luiza Scheirlynck, Esther Roosens, Bram Tanaka, Kaoru Houard, Laura Droogmans, Steven Cosyns, Bernard Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography |
title | Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography |
title_full | Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography |
title_short | Feasibility, Reproducibility and Validation of Right Ventricular Volume and Function Assessment Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography |
title_sort | feasibility, reproducibility and validation of right ventricular volume and function assessment using three-dimensional echocardiography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8070805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depottertom feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT weytjenscaroline feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT motocandreea feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT luchianmarialuiza feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT scheirlynckesther feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT roosensbram feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT tanakakaoru feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT houardlaura feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT droogmanssteven feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography AT cosynsbernard feasibilityreproducibilityandvalidationofrightventricularvolumeandfunctionassessmentusingthreedimensionalechocardiography |