Cargando…
Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The ability to escalate the radiation dose to head and neck tumors has been shown to offer improved local control, and consequently, survival for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients. This study evaluates the HyperArc automated non-coplanar planning technique (originally de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081910 |
_version_ | 1783683683423617024 |
---|---|
author | Woods, Kaley Chin, Robert K. Cook, Kiri A. Sheng, Ke Kishan, Amar U. Hegde, John V. Tenn, Stephen Steinberg, Michael L. Cao, Minsong |
author_facet | Woods, Kaley Chin, Robert K. Cook, Kiri A. Sheng, Ke Kishan, Amar U. Hegde, John V. Tenn, Stephen Steinberg, Michael L. Cao, Minsong |
author_sort | Woods, Kaley |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The ability to escalate the radiation dose to head and neck tumors has been shown to offer improved local control, and consequently, survival for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients. This study evaluates the HyperArc automated non-coplanar planning technique (originally developed for intracranial treatment) for 20 rHNC patients, and compares this technique to conventional planning methods. HyperArc enables significant tumor dose escalation, with average increases in mean target dose of over 11.5 Gy (26%), while maintaining clinically-equivalent doses to nearby organs. Our results show that the average probability of tumor control is 23% higher for HyperArc than conventional techniques. ABSTRACT: This study evaluates the potential for tumor dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients with automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning (HyperArc). Twenty rHNC patients are planned with conventional VMAT SBRT to 40 Gy while minimizing organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. They are then re-planned with the HyperArc technique to match these minimal OAR doses while escalating the target dose as high as possible. Then, we compare the dosimetry, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the two plan types. Our results show that the HyperArc technique significantly increases the mean planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) doses by 10.8 ± 4.4 Gy (25%) and 11.5 ± 5.1 Gy (26%) on average, respectively. There are no clinically significant differences in OAR doses, with maximum dose differences of <2 Gy on average. The average TCP is 23% (± 21%) higher for HyperArc than conventional plans, with no significant differences in NTCP for the brainstem, cord, mandible, or larynx. HyperArc can achieve significant tumor dose escalation while maintaining minimal OAR doses in the head and neck—potentially enabling improved local control for rHNC SBRT patients without increased risk of treatment-related toxicities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8071369 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80713692021-04-26 Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients Woods, Kaley Chin, Robert K. Cook, Kiri A. Sheng, Ke Kishan, Amar U. Hegde, John V. Tenn, Stephen Steinberg, Michael L. Cao, Minsong Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The ability to escalate the radiation dose to head and neck tumors has been shown to offer improved local control, and consequently, survival for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients. This study evaluates the HyperArc automated non-coplanar planning technique (originally developed for intracranial treatment) for 20 rHNC patients, and compares this technique to conventional planning methods. HyperArc enables significant tumor dose escalation, with average increases in mean target dose of over 11.5 Gy (26%), while maintaining clinically-equivalent doses to nearby organs. Our results show that the average probability of tumor control is 23% higher for HyperArc than conventional techniques. ABSTRACT: This study evaluates the potential for tumor dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients with automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning (HyperArc). Twenty rHNC patients are planned with conventional VMAT SBRT to 40 Gy while minimizing organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. They are then re-planned with the HyperArc technique to match these minimal OAR doses while escalating the target dose as high as possible. Then, we compare the dosimetry, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the two plan types. Our results show that the HyperArc technique significantly increases the mean planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) doses by 10.8 ± 4.4 Gy (25%) and 11.5 ± 5.1 Gy (26%) on average, respectively. There are no clinically significant differences in OAR doses, with maximum dose differences of <2 Gy on average. The average TCP is 23% (± 21%) higher for HyperArc than conventional plans, with no significant differences in NTCP for the brainstem, cord, mandible, or larynx. HyperArc can achieve significant tumor dose escalation while maintaining minimal OAR doses in the head and neck—potentially enabling improved local control for rHNC SBRT patients without increased risk of treatment-related toxicities. MDPI 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8071369/ /pubmed/33921062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081910 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Woods, Kaley Chin, Robert K. Cook, Kiri A. Sheng, Ke Kishan, Amar U. Hegde, John V. Tenn, Stephen Steinberg, Michael L. Cao, Minsong Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients |
title | Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients |
title_full | Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients |
title_short | Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients |
title_sort | automated non-coplanar vmat for dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071369/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081910 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodskaley automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT chinrobertk automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT cookkiria automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT shengke automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT kishanamaru automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT hegdejohnv automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT tennstephen automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT steinbergmichaell automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients AT caominsong automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients |