Cargando…

Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The ability to escalate the radiation dose to head and neck tumors has been shown to offer improved local control, and consequently, survival for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients. This study evaluates the HyperArc automated non-coplanar planning technique (originally de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Kaley, Chin, Robert K., Cook, Kiri A., Sheng, Ke, Kishan, Amar U., Hegde, John V., Tenn, Stephen, Steinberg, Michael L., Cao, Minsong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921062
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081910
_version_ 1783683683423617024
author Woods, Kaley
Chin, Robert K.
Cook, Kiri A.
Sheng, Ke
Kishan, Amar U.
Hegde, John V.
Tenn, Stephen
Steinberg, Michael L.
Cao, Minsong
author_facet Woods, Kaley
Chin, Robert K.
Cook, Kiri A.
Sheng, Ke
Kishan, Amar U.
Hegde, John V.
Tenn, Stephen
Steinberg, Michael L.
Cao, Minsong
author_sort Woods, Kaley
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The ability to escalate the radiation dose to head and neck tumors has been shown to offer improved local control, and consequently, survival for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients. This study evaluates the HyperArc automated non-coplanar planning technique (originally developed for intracranial treatment) for 20 rHNC patients, and compares this technique to conventional planning methods. HyperArc enables significant tumor dose escalation, with average increases in mean target dose of over 11.5 Gy (26%), while maintaining clinically-equivalent doses to nearby organs. Our results show that the average probability of tumor control is 23% higher for HyperArc than conventional techniques. ABSTRACT: This study evaluates the potential for tumor dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients with automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning (HyperArc). Twenty rHNC patients are planned with conventional VMAT SBRT to 40 Gy while minimizing organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. They are then re-planned with the HyperArc technique to match these minimal OAR doses while escalating the target dose as high as possible. Then, we compare the dosimetry, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the two plan types. Our results show that the HyperArc technique significantly increases the mean planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) doses by 10.8 ± 4.4 Gy (25%) and 11.5 ± 5.1 Gy (26%) on average, respectively. There are no clinically significant differences in OAR doses, with maximum dose differences of <2 Gy on average. The average TCP is 23% (± 21%) higher for HyperArc than conventional plans, with no significant differences in NTCP for the brainstem, cord, mandible, or larynx. HyperArc can achieve significant tumor dose escalation while maintaining minimal OAR doses in the head and neck—potentially enabling improved local control for rHNC SBRT patients without increased risk of treatment-related toxicities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8071369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80713692021-04-26 Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients Woods, Kaley Chin, Robert K. Cook, Kiri A. Sheng, Ke Kishan, Amar U. Hegde, John V. Tenn, Stephen Steinberg, Michael L. Cao, Minsong Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The ability to escalate the radiation dose to head and neck tumors has been shown to offer improved local control, and consequently, survival for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients. This study evaluates the HyperArc automated non-coplanar planning technique (originally developed for intracranial treatment) for 20 rHNC patients, and compares this technique to conventional planning methods. HyperArc enables significant tumor dose escalation, with average increases in mean target dose of over 11.5 Gy (26%), while maintaining clinically-equivalent doses to nearby organs. Our results show that the average probability of tumor control is 23% higher for HyperArc than conventional techniques. ABSTRACT: This study evaluates the potential for tumor dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) patients with automated non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) planning (HyperArc). Twenty rHNC patients are planned with conventional VMAT SBRT to 40 Gy while minimizing organ-at-risk (OAR) doses. They are then re-planned with the HyperArc technique to match these minimal OAR doses while escalating the target dose as high as possible. Then, we compare the dosimetry, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the two plan types. Our results show that the HyperArc technique significantly increases the mean planning target volume (PTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) doses by 10.8 ± 4.4 Gy (25%) and 11.5 ± 5.1 Gy (26%) on average, respectively. There are no clinically significant differences in OAR doses, with maximum dose differences of <2 Gy on average. The average TCP is 23% (± 21%) higher for HyperArc than conventional plans, with no significant differences in NTCP for the brainstem, cord, mandible, or larynx. HyperArc can achieve significant tumor dose escalation while maintaining minimal OAR doses in the head and neck—potentially enabling improved local control for rHNC SBRT patients without increased risk of treatment-related toxicities. MDPI 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8071369/ /pubmed/33921062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081910 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Woods, Kaley
Chin, Robert K.
Cook, Kiri A.
Sheng, Ke
Kishan, Amar U.
Hegde, John V.
Tenn, Stephen
Steinberg, Michael L.
Cao, Minsong
Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_full Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_short Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_sort automated non-coplanar vmat for dose escalation in recurrent head and neck cancer patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921062
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13081910
work_keys_str_mv AT woodskaley automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT chinrobertk automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT cookkiria automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT shengke automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT kishanamaru automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT hegdejohnv automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT tennstephen automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT steinbergmichaell automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients
AT caominsong automatednoncoplanarvmatfordoseescalationinrecurrentheadandneckcancerpatients