Cargando…

Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models

In recent years, the need for sophisticated human in vitro models for integrative biology has motivated the development of organ-on-a-chip platforms. Organ-on-a-chip devices are engineered to mimic the mechanical, biochemical and physiological properties of human organs; however, there are many impo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameron, Tiffany, Bennet, Tanya, Rowe, Elyn M., Anwer, Mehwish, Wellington, Cheryl L., Cheung, Karen C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921018
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12040441
_version_ 1783683696807641088
author Cameron, Tiffany
Bennet, Tanya
Rowe, Elyn M.
Anwer, Mehwish
Wellington, Cheryl L.
Cheung, Karen C.
author_facet Cameron, Tiffany
Bennet, Tanya
Rowe, Elyn M.
Anwer, Mehwish
Wellington, Cheryl L.
Cheung, Karen C.
author_sort Cameron, Tiffany
collection PubMed
description In recent years, the need for sophisticated human in vitro models for integrative biology has motivated the development of organ-on-a-chip platforms. Organ-on-a-chip devices are engineered to mimic the mechanical, biochemical and physiological properties of human organs; however, there are many important considerations when selecting or designing an appropriate device for investigating a specific scientific question. Building microfluidic Brain-on-a-Chip (BoC) models from the ground-up will allow for research questions to be answered more thoroughly in the brain research field, but the design of these devices requires several choices to be made throughout the design development phase. These considerations include the cell types, extracellular matrix (ECM) material(s), and perfusion/flow considerations. Choices made early in the design cycle will dictate the limitations of the device and influence the end-point results such as the permeability of the endothelial cell monolayer, and the expression of cell type-specific markers. To better understand why the engineering aspects of a microfluidic BoC need to be influenced by the desired biological environment, recent progress in microfluidic BoC technology is compared. This review focuses on perfusable blood–brain barrier (BBB) and neurovascular unit (NVU) models with discussions about the chip architecture, the ECM used, and how they relate to the in vivo human brain. With increased knowledge on how to make informed choices when selecting or designing BoC models, the scientific community will benefit from shorter development phases and platforms curated for their application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8071412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80714122021-04-26 Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models Cameron, Tiffany Bennet, Tanya Rowe, Elyn M. Anwer, Mehwish Wellington, Cheryl L. Cheung, Karen C. Micromachines (Basel) Review In recent years, the need for sophisticated human in vitro models for integrative biology has motivated the development of organ-on-a-chip platforms. Organ-on-a-chip devices are engineered to mimic the mechanical, biochemical and physiological properties of human organs; however, there are many important considerations when selecting or designing an appropriate device for investigating a specific scientific question. Building microfluidic Brain-on-a-Chip (BoC) models from the ground-up will allow for research questions to be answered more thoroughly in the brain research field, but the design of these devices requires several choices to be made throughout the design development phase. These considerations include the cell types, extracellular matrix (ECM) material(s), and perfusion/flow considerations. Choices made early in the design cycle will dictate the limitations of the device and influence the end-point results such as the permeability of the endothelial cell monolayer, and the expression of cell type-specific markers. To better understand why the engineering aspects of a microfluidic BoC need to be influenced by the desired biological environment, recent progress in microfluidic BoC technology is compared. This review focuses on perfusable blood–brain barrier (BBB) and neurovascular unit (NVU) models with discussions about the chip architecture, the ECM used, and how they relate to the in vivo human brain. With increased knowledge on how to make informed choices when selecting or designing BoC models, the scientific community will benefit from shorter development phases and platforms curated for their application. MDPI 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8071412/ /pubmed/33921018 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12040441 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cameron, Tiffany
Bennet, Tanya
Rowe, Elyn M.
Anwer, Mehwish
Wellington, Cheryl L.
Cheung, Karen C.
Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models
title Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models
title_full Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models
title_fullStr Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models
title_full_unstemmed Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models
title_short Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models
title_sort review of design considerations for brain-on-a-chip models
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921018
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12040441
work_keys_str_mv AT camerontiffany reviewofdesignconsiderationsforbrainonachipmodels
AT bennettanya reviewofdesignconsiderationsforbrainonachipmodels
AT roweelynm reviewofdesignconsiderationsforbrainonachipmodels
AT anwermehwish reviewofdesignconsiderationsforbrainonachipmodels
AT wellingtoncheryll reviewofdesignconsiderationsforbrainonachipmodels
AT cheungkarenc reviewofdesignconsiderationsforbrainonachipmodels