Cargando…

The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers

INTRODUCTION: Eye care in many countries is provided by optometrists, ophthalmologists, primary care providers (PCPs, including family physicians and pediatricians) and emergency department (ED) physicians. In the province of Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada, optometric services are not government...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, William, Trope, Graham E, Buys, Yvonne M, Wedge, Richard, El-Defrawy, Sherif, Chen, Qi-Sheng, Jin, Ya-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911907
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S303087
_version_ 1783683764314963968
author Jeon, William
Trope, Graham E
Buys, Yvonne M
Wedge, Richard
El-Defrawy, Sherif
Chen, Qi-Sheng
Jin, Ya-Ping
author_facet Jeon, William
Trope, Graham E
Buys, Yvonne M
Wedge, Richard
El-Defrawy, Sherif
Chen, Qi-Sheng
Jin, Ya-Ping
author_sort Jeon, William
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Eye care in many countries is provided by optometrists, ophthalmologists, primary care providers (PCPs, including family physicians and pediatricians) and emergency department (ED) physicians. In the province of Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada, optometric services are not government-insured, while services provided by other eye care providers are government-insured. Clinics of optometrists, PCPs and ED physicians are widely distributed across the island. Clinics of ophthalmologists however are concentrated in the capital city Charlottetown. PURPOSE: To investigate if more patients visited government-insured PCPs and EDs for eye care when local optometric services are government-uninsured and government-insured ophthalmologists are potentially distant. METHODS: From PEI physician billing database, we identified all patients with an ocular diagnosis from 2010–2012 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes. The utilization of government-insured PCPs and EDs in five geographical regions was assessed utilizing patients’ residential postal code. Of the five regions, Prince was the region farthest from the capital Charlottetown. RESULTS: Compared to utilization of government-insured PCPs for ocular diagnoses in Charlottetown (13.5% in 2010, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9–14.0%), the utilization in Prince (22.4% in 2010, 95% CI 21.7–23.1%) was nearly double (p<0.05). The utilization of ED physicians for ocular diagnoses was similarly double in Prince (8.8%, 95% CI 8.3–9.3%) versus Charlottetown (4.1%, 95% CI 3.8–4.5%). The utilization of ophthalmologists however was significantly lower in Prince (43%, 95% CI 41.4–42.9%) versus Charlottetown (56.3%, 95% CI 55.6–57.1%). Similar trends remained throughout 2010–2012. CONCLUSION: When optometric services are government-uninsured and government-insured ophthalmologist services are geographically distant, ocular patients utilized PCPs and ED physicians more frequently. Due to different levels of training and available equipment for eye examinations among PCPs, ED physicians and optometrists, the quality of eye care and cost-effectiveness of increased use of PCPs and ED physicians for ocular management warrant further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8071696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80716962021-04-27 The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers Jeon, William Trope, Graham E Buys, Yvonne M Wedge, Richard El-Defrawy, Sherif Chen, Qi-Sheng Jin, Ya-Ping Clin Optom (Auckl) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Eye care in many countries is provided by optometrists, ophthalmologists, primary care providers (PCPs, including family physicians and pediatricians) and emergency department (ED) physicians. In the province of Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada, optometric services are not government-insured, while services provided by other eye care providers are government-insured. Clinics of optometrists, PCPs and ED physicians are widely distributed across the island. Clinics of ophthalmologists however are concentrated in the capital city Charlottetown. PURPOSE: To investigate if more patients visited government-insured PCPs and EDs for eye care when local optometric services are government-uninsured and government-insured ophthalmologists are potentially distant. METHODS: From PEI physician billing database, we identified all patients with an ocular diagnosis from 2010–2012 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) codes. The utilization of government-insured PCPs and EDs in five geographical regions was assessed utilizing patients’ residential postal code. Of the five regions, Prince was the region farthest from the capital Charlottetown. RESULTS: Compared to utilization of government-insured PCPs for ocular diagnoses in Charlottetown (13.5% in 2010, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9–14.0%), the utilization in Prince (22.4% in 2010, 95% CI 21.7–23.1%) was nearly double (p<0.05). The utilization of ED physicians for ocular diagnoses was similarly double in Prince (8.8%, 95% CI 8.3–9.3%) versus Charlottetown (4.1%, 95% CI 3.8–4.5%). The utilization of ophthalmologists however was significantly lower in Prince (43%, 95% CI 41.4–42.9%) versus Charlottetown (56.3%, 95% CI 55.6–57.1%). Similar trends remained throughout 2010–2012. CONCLUSION: When optometric services are government-uninsured and government-insured ophthalmologist services are geographically distant, ocular patients utilized PCPs and ED physicians more frequently. Due to different levels of training and available equipment for eye examinations among PCPs, ED physicians and optometrists, the quality of eye care and cost-effectiveness of increased use of PCPs and ED physicians for ocular management warrant further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. Dove 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8071696/ /pubmed/33911907 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S303087 Text en © 2021 Jeon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jeon, William
Trope, Graham E
Buys, Yvonne M
Wedge, Richard
El-Defrawy, Sherif
Chen, Qi-Sheng
Jin, Ya-Ping
The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers
title The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers
title_full The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers
title_fullStr The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers
title_short The Effect of Government-Uninsured Optometric Services on the Use of Primary Care Providers
title_sort effect of government-uninsured optometric services on the use of primary care providers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8071696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911907
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S303087
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonwilliam theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT tropegrahame theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT buysyvonnem theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT wedgerichard theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT eldefrawysherif theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT chenqisheng theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT jinyaping theeffectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT jeonwilliam effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT tropegrahame effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT buysyvonnem effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT wedgerichard effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT eldefrawysherif effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT chenqisheng effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders
AT jinyaping effectofgovernmentuninsuredoptometricservicesontheuseofprimarycareproviders