Evaluating the Quality of Reports About Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to improve the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by evaluating RCTs of acupuncture for low back pain (LBP) based on the CONSORT and STRICTA statements. METHODS: Literature from the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang database, and Chongqing Weipu (VIP) was systematically searched from 2010 to 2020. The general characteristics and the overall quality score (OQS) of the literature were evaluated by two investigators. The agreement between investigators was calculated using Cohen’s kappa statistics. RESULTS: A total of 31 RCTs were extracted in the final analysis. Based on the CONSORT statement, the items “title and abstract”, “background and objectives”, “intervention”, “outcomes”, “statistical methods”, “baseline data”, “outcomes and estimation” and “interpretation” have a positive rate of greater than 80%. The items “implementation”, “generalizability” and “protocol” have a positive rate of less than 30%. Based on the STRICTA statement, the items “style of acupuncture”, “needle retention time”, “number of treatment sessions”, “frequency and duration of treatment” and “precise description of the control or comparator” have a positive rate of greater than 80%. The item “extent to which the treatment was varied” has a positive rate of less than 30%. The agreements among most items are determined to be moderate or good. CONCLUSION: The reporting quality of RCTs of acupuncture for LBP is moderate. Researchers should rigidly follow the CONSORT and STRICTA statements to enhance the quality of their studies.