Cargando…

Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study

PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Heejoo, Chang, Jee Suk, Moon, Jin Young, Lee, Won Hee, Shah, Chirag, Shim, Jin Sup (Andy), Han, Min Cheol, Baek, Jong Geol, Park, Ryeong Hwang, Kim, Yong Bae, Kim, Jin Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.645328
_version_ 1783683840188874752
author Ko, Heejoo
Chang, Jee Suk
Moon, Jin Young
Lee, Won Hee
Shah, Chirag
Shim, Jin Sup (Andy)
Han, Min Cheol
Baek, Jong Geol
Park, Ryeong Hwang
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Jin Sung
author_facet Ko, Heejoo
Chang, Jee Suk
Moon, Jin Young
Lee, Won Hee
Shah, Chirag
Shim, Jin Sup (Andy)
Han, Min Cheol
Baek, Jong Geol
Park, Ryeong Hwang
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Jin Sung
author_sort Ko, Heejoo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5–6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8072050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80720502021-04-27 Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study Ko, Heejoo Chang, Jee Suk Moon, Jin Young Lee, Won Hee Shah, Chirag Shim, Jin Sup (Andy) Han, Min Cheol Baek, Jong Geol Park, Ryeong Hwang Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5–6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8072050/ /pubmed/33912459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.645328 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ko, Chang, Moon, Lee, Shah, Shim, Han, Baek, Park, Kim and Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ko, Heejoo
Chang, Jee Suk
Moon, Jin Young
Lee, Won Hee
Shah, Chirag
Shim, Jin Sup (Andy)
Han, Min Cheol
Baek, Jong Geol
Park, Ryeong Hwang
Kim, Yong Bae
Kim, Jin Sung
Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
title Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
title_full Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
title_fullStr Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
title_short Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
title_sort dosimetric comparison of radiation techniques for comprehensive regional nodal radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer: a treatment planning study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.645328
work_keys_str_mv AT koheejoo dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT changjeesuk dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT moonjinyoung dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT leewonhee dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT shahchirag dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT shimjinsupandy dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT hanmincheol dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT baekjonggeol dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT parkryeonghwang dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT kimyongbae dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy
AT kimjinsung dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy