Cargando…
Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study
PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.645328 |
_version_ | 1783683840188874752 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Heejoo Chang, Jee Suk Moon, Jin Young Lee, Won Hee Shah, Chirag Shim, Jin Sup (Andy) Han, Min Cheol Baek, Jong Geol Park, Ryeong Hwang Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung |
author_facet | Ko, Heejoo Chang, Jee Suk Moon, Jin Young Lee, Won Hee Shah, Chirag Shim, Jin Sup (Andy) Han, Min Cheol Baek, Jong Geol Park, Ryeong Hwang Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung |
author_sort | Ko, Heejoo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5–6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8072050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80720502021-04-27 Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study Ko, Heejoo Chang, Jee Suk Moon, Jin Young Lee, Won Hee Shah, Chirag Shim, Jin Sup (Andy) Han, Min Cheol Baek, Jong Geol Park, Ryeong Hwang Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. METHODS: Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5–6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8072050/ /pubmed/33912459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.645328 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ko, Chang, Moon, Lee, Shah, Shim, Han, Baek, Park, Kim and Kim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ko, Heejoo Chang, Jee Suk Moon, Jin Young Lee, Won Hee Shah, Chirag Shim, Jin Sup (Andy) Han, Min Cheol Baek, Jong Geol Park, Ryeong Hwang Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jin Sung Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study |
title | Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study |
title_full | Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study |
title_short | Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study |
title_sort | dosimetric comparison of radiation techniques for comprehensive regional nodal radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer: a treatment planning study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.645328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koheejoo dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT changjeesuk dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT moonjinyoung dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT leewonhee dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT shahchirag dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT shimjinsupandy dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT hanmincheol dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT baekjonggeol dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT parkryeonghwang dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT kimyongbae dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy AT kimjinsung dosimetriccomparisonofradiationtechniquesforcomprehensiveregionalnodalradiationtherapyforleftsidedbreastcanceratreatmentplanningstudy |