Cargando…

Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to validate pathologic findings of ground-glass nodules (GGOs) of different consolidation tumor ratios (CTRs), and to explore whether GGOs could be stratified according to CTR with an increment of 0.25 based on its prognostic role. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xi, Junjie, Yin, Jiacheng, Liang, Jiaqi, Zhan, Cheng, Jiang, Wei, Lin, Zongwu, Xu, Songtao, Wang, Qun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616149
_version_ 1783683854869987328
author Xi, Junjie
Yin, Jiacheng
Liang, Jiaqi
Zhan, Cheng
Jiang, Wei
Lin, Zongwu
Xu, Songtao
Wang, Qun
author_facet Xi, Junjie
Yin, Jiacheng
Liang, Jiaqi
Zhan, Cheng
Jiang, Wei
Lin, Zongwu
Xu, Songtao
Wang, Qun
author_sort Xi, Junjie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to validate pathologic findings of ground-glass nodules (GGOs) of different consolidation tumor ratios (CTRs), and to explore whether GGOs could be stratified according to CTR with an increment of 0.25 based on its prognostic role. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with clinical stage IA GGOs who underwent curative resection between 2011 and 2016. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to CTR step by 0.25. Cumulative survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to obtain the risk factors on relapse-free survival (RFS). The surv_function of the R package survminer was used to determine the optimal cutoff value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was generated to validate optimal cutoff points of factors. RESULTS: A total of 862 patients (608 women; median age, 59y) were included, with 442 patients in group A (CTR ≤ 0.25), 210 patients in group B (0.25<CTR ≤ 0.5), 173 patients in group C (0.5<CTR ≤ 0.75), and 37 patients in group D (0.75<CTR<1). The rate of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) in group A (70.6%) was much higher than other three groups (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that CTR (HR, 1.865; 95%CI, 1.312-2.650; p = 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 10.407; 95%CI, 1.957-55.343; p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence free survival. In addition, CTR was the only risk factor for the presence of micropapillary or solid pattern (OR=133.9, 95%CI:32.2-556.2, P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (OR=292498.8, 95%CI:1.2-7.4×10(10), P=0.047). Paired comparison showed that rate of presence of micropapillary or solid pattern was highest in group D, followed by group C and group A/B (p<0.001). Lymph node metastasis occurred in group D only (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CTR is an independent prognostic factor for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO in CT scan. Radiologic cutoffs of CTR 0.50 and 0.75 were able to subdivide patients with different prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8072116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80721162021-04-27 Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities Xi, Junjie Yin, Jiacheng Liang, Jiaqi Zhan, Cheng Jiang, Wei Lin, Zongwu Xu, Songtao Wang, Qun Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to validate pathologic findings of ground-glass nodules (GGOs) of different consolidation tumor ratios (CTRs), and to explore whether GGOs could be stratified according to CTR with an increment of 0.25 based on its prognostic role. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with clinical stage IA GGOs who underwent curative resection between 2011 and 2016. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to CTR step by 0.25. Cumulative survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to obtain the risk factors on relapse-free survival (RFS). The surv_function of the R package survminer was used to determine the optimal cutoff value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was generated to validate optimal cutoff points of factors. RESULTS: A total of 862 patients (608 women; median age, 59y) were included, with 442 patients in group A (CTR ≤ 0.25), 210 patients in group B (0.25<CTR ≤ 0.5), 173 patients in group C (0.5<CTR ≤ 0.75), and 37 patients in group D (0.75<CTR<1). The rate of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) in group A (70.6%) was much higher than other three groups (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that CTR (HR, 1.865; 95%CI, 1.312-2.650; p = 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 10.407; 95%CI, 1.957-55.343; p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence free survival. In addition, CTR was the only risk factor for the presence of micropapillary or solid pattern (OR=133.9, 95%CI:32.2-556.2, P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (OR=292498.8, 95%CI:1.2-7.4×10(10), P=0.047). Paired comparison showed that rate of presence of micropapillary or solid pattern was highest in group D, followed by group C and group A/B (p<0.001). Lymph node metastasis occurred in group D only (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CTR is an independent prognostic factor for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO in CT scan. Radiologic cutoffs of CTR 0.50 and 0.75 were able to subdivide patients with different prognosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8072116/ /pubmed/33912445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616149 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xi, Yin, Liang, Zhan, Jiang, Lin, Xu and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xi, Junjie
Yin, Jiacheng
Liang, Jiaqi
Zhan, Cheng
Jiang, Wei
Lin, Zongwu
Xu, Songtao
Wang, Qun
Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
title Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
title_full Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
title_fullStr Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
title_short Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
title_sort prognostic impact of radiological consolidation tumor ratio in clinical stage ia pulmonary ground glass opacities
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616149
work_keys_str_mv AT xijunjie prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT yinjiacheng prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT liangjiaqi prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT zhancheng prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT jiangwei prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT linzongwu prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT xusongtao prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities
AT wangqun prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities