Cargando…
Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities
OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to validate pathologic findings of ground-glass nodules (GGOs) of different consolidation tumor ratios (CTRs), and to explore whether GGOs could be stratified according to CTR with an increment of 0.25 based on its prognostic role. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616149 |
_version_ | 1783683854869987328 |
---|---|
author | Xi, Junjie Yin, Jiacheng Liang, Jiaqi Zhan, Cheng Jiang, Wei Lin, Zongwu Xu, Songtao Wang, Qun |
author_facet | Xi, Junjie Yin, Jiacheng Liang, Jiaqi Zhan, Cheng Jiang, Wei Lin, Zongwu Xu, Songtao Wang, Qun |
author_sort | Xi, Junjie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to validate pathologic findings of ground-glass nodules (GGOs) of different consolidation tumor ratios (CTRs), and to explore whether GGOs could be stratified according to CTR with an increment of 0.25 based on its prognostic role. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with clinical stage IA GGOs who underwent curative resection between 2011 and 2016. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to CTR step by 0.25. Cumulative survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to obtain the risk factors on relapse-free survival (RFS). The surv_function of the R package survminer was used to determine the optimal cutoff value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was generated to validate optimal cutoff points of factors. RESULTS: A total of 862 patients (608 women; median age, 59y) were included, with 442 patients in group A (CTR ≤ 0.25), 210 patients in group B (0.25<CTR ≤ 0.5), 173 patients in group C (0.5<CTR ≤ 0.75), and 37 patients in group D (0.75<CTR<1). The rate of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) in group A (70.6%) was much higher than other three groups (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that CTR (HR, 1.865; 95%CI, 1.312-2.650; p = 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 10.407; 95%CI, 1.957-55.343; p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence free survival. In addition, CTR was the only risk factor for the presence of micropapillary or solid pattern (OR=133.9, 95%CI:32.2-556.2, P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (OR=292498.8, 95%CI:1.2-7.4×10(10), P=0.047). Paired comparison showed that rate of presence of micropapillary or solid pattern was highest in group D, followed by group C and group A/B (p<0.001). Lymph node metastasis occurred in group D only (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CTR is an independent prognostic factor for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO in CT scan. Radiologic cutoffs of CTR 0.50 and 0.75 were able to subdivide patients with different prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8072116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80721162021-04-27 Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities Xi, Junjie Yin, Jiacheng Liang, Jiaqi Zhan, Cheng Jiang, Wei Lin, Zongwu Xu, Songtao Wang, Qun Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to validate pathologic findings of ground-glass nodules (GGOs) of different consolidation tumor ratios (CTRs), and to explore whether GGOs could be stratified according to CTR with an increment of 0.25 based on its prognostic role. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with clinical stage IA GGOs who underwent curative resection between 2011 and 2016. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to CTR step by 0.25. Cumulative survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to obtain the risk factors on relapse-free survival (RFS). The surv_function of the R package survminer was used to determine the optimal cutoff value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was generated to validate optimal cutoff points of factors. RESULTS: A total of 862 patients (608 women; median age, 59y) were included, with 442 patients in group A (CTR ≤ 0.25), 210 patients in group B (0.25<CTR ≤ 0.5), 173 patients in group C (0.5<CTR ≤ 0.75), and 37 patients in group D (0.75<CTR<1). The rate of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) in group A (70.6%) was much higher than other three groups (p<0.001). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that CTR (HR, 1.865; 95%CI, 1.312-2.650; p = 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 10.407; 95%CI, 1.957-55.343; p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence free survival. In addition, CTR was the only risk factor for the presence of micropapillary or solid pattern (OR=133.9, 95%CI:32.2-556.2, P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (OR=292498.8, 95%CI:1.2-7.4×10(10), P=0.047). Paired comparison showed that rate of presence of micropapillary or solid pattern was highest in group D, followed by group C and group A/B (p<0.001). Lymph node metastasis occurred in group D only (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CTR is an independent prognostic factor for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as GGO in CT scan. Radiologic cutoffs of CTR 0.50 and 0.75 were able to subdivide patients with different prognosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8072116/ /pubmed/33912445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616149 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xi, Yin, Liang, Zhan, Jiang, Lin, Xu and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xi, Junjie Yin, Jiacheng Liang, Jiaqi Zhan, Cheng Jiang, Wei Lin, Zongwu Xu, Songtao Wang, Qun Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities |
title | Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities |
title_full | Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities |
title_short | Prognostic Impact of Radiological Consolidation Tumor Ratio in Clinical Stage IA Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities |
title_sort | prognostic impact of radiological consolidation tumor ratio in clinical stage ia pulmonary ground glass opacities |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33912445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.616149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xijunjie prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT yinjiacheng prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT liangjiaqi prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT zhancheng prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT jiangwei prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT linzongwu prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT xusongtao prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities AT wangqun prognosticimpactofradiologicalconsolidationtumorratioinclinicalstageiapulmonarygroundglassopacities |