Cargando…
Effects of Incorporating Dry Matter Intake and Residual Feed Intake into a Selection Index for Dairy Cattle Using Deterministic Modeling
SIMPLE SUMMARY: With the increasing cost of production, increasing global population, and a greater focus on sustainability, methods to improve cow efficiency are becoming critical for the dairy industry. An efficient cow is the one that produces the same amount of milk and milk solids while consumi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33920730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11041157 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: With the increasing cost of production, increasing global population, and a greater focus on sustainability, methods to improve cow efficiency are becoming critical for the dairy industry. An efficient cow is the one that produces the same amount of milk and milk solids while consuming less feed and remaining healthy and fertile; thus, allowing for a reduction of costs without reduced production. This simulation showed that directly selecting on feed conversion efficiency allowed for an economically advantageous and more balanced response to selection than indirect selection on feed intake. If too much selection pressure is placed on feed efficiency, there are negative implications for other traits within the selection index. Further work is required to optimize the methods for including feed efficiency in a selection index. ABSTRACT: The inclusion of feed efficiency in the breeding goal for dairy cattle has been discussed for many years. The effects of incorporating feed efficiency into a selection index were assessed by indirect selection (dry matter intake) and direct selection (residual feed intake) using deterministic modeling. Both traits were investigated in three ways: (1) restricting the trait genetic gain to zero, (2) applying negative selection pressure, and (3) applying positive selection pressure. Changes in response to selection from economic and genetic gain perspectives were used to evaluate the impact of including feed efficiency with direct or indirect selection in an index. Improving feed efficiency through direct selection on residual feed intake was the best scenario analyzed, with the highest overall economic response including favorable responses to selection for production and feed efficiency. Over time, the response to selection is cumulative, with the potential for animals to reduce consumption by 0.16 kg to 2.7 kg of dry matter per day while maintaining production. As the selection pressure increased on residual feed intake, the response to selection for production, health, and fertility traits and body condition score became increasingly less favorable. This work provides insight into the potential long-term effects of selecting for feed efficiency as residual feed intake. |
---|