Cargando…
Saving Lives: For the Best Outcome?
In this article, I critique a moral argument developed in Frances Kamm’s Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. The argument, which I label the Best Outcome Argument, aims to criticize the Taurekian idea that it is not worse if more people die than if fewer do in conflict...
Autor principal: | Wang, Xueshi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00355-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ocular Oncology: Saving Sight, Saving Lives
por: Gündüz, Ahmet Kaan
Publicado: (2018) -
Learning to save lives!
Publicado: (2003) -
Saving the Breast Saves the Lives of Breast Cancer Patients
por: Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
AIMing to save lives
por: Berry, A, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Outcome after CPR: when we cannot save lives, we can save organs
por: Caestecker, C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)