Cargando…

Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?

Denosumab was approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in 2010, based on the FREEDOM study, which indicated a benefit in terms of increased bone mineral density and reduced risk of major osteoporotic fracture. In the initial clinical studies it was noted that discontinuation of deno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noble, Jane A., McKenna, Malachi J., Crowley, Rachel K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20420188211010052
_version_ 1783684019859226624
author Noble, Jane A.
McKenna, Malachi J.
Crowley, Rachel K.
author_facet Noble, Jane A.
McKenna, Malachi J.
Crowley, Rachel K.
author_sort Noble, Jane A.
collection PubMed
description Denosumab was approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in 2010, based on the FREEDOM study, which indicated a benefit in terms of increased bone mineral density and reduced risk of major osteoporotic fracture. In the initial clinical studies it was noted that discontinuation of denosumab can lead to a rebound of bone turnover markers and loss of accrued bone mineral density. An increased risk of fractures (multiple vertebral fractures in particular) associated with discontinuation was noted after approval and marketing of denosumab. For many patients experiencing gain in bone mineral density and fracture prevention while taking denosumab, there is no reason to stop therapy. However, discontinuation of denosumab may happen due to non-adherence; potential lack of efficacy in an individual; where reimbursement for therapy is limited to those with bone mineral density in the osteoporosis range, when assessment reveals this has been exceeded; or patient or physician concern regarding side effects. This review paper aims to discuss these concerns and to summarize the data available to date regarding sequential osteoporosis therapy following denosumab cessation to reduce the risk of multiple vertebral fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8072936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80729362021-06-07 Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely? Noble, Jane A. McKenna, Malachi J. Crowley, Rachel K. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab Review Denosumab was approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in 2010, based on the FREEDOM study, which indicated a benefit in terms of increased bone mineral density and reduced risk of major osteoporotic fracture. In the initial clinical studies it was noted that discontinuation of denosumab can lead to a rebound of bone turnover markers and loss of accrued bone mineral density. An increased risk of fractures (multiple vertebral fractures in particular) associated with discontinuation was noted after approval and marketing of denosumab. For many patients experiencing gain in bone mineral density and fracture prevention while taking denosumab, there is no reason to stop therapy. However, discontinuation of denosumab may happen due to non-adherence; potential lack of efficacy in an individual; where reimbursement for therapy is limited to those with bone mineral density in the osteoporosis range, when assessment reveals this has been exceeded; or patient or physician concern regarding side effects. This review paper aims to discuss these concerns and to summarize the data available to date regarding sequential osteoporosis therapy following denosumab cessation to reduce the risk of multiple vertebral fracture. SAGE Publications 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8072936/ /pubmed/34104392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20420188211010052 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Noble, Jane A.
McKenna, Malachi J.
Crowley, Rachel K.
Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
title Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
title_full Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
title_fullStr Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
title_full_unstemmed Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
title_short Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
title_sort should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8072936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20420188211010052
work_keys_str_mv AT noblejanea shoulddenosumabtreatmentforosteoporosisbecontinuedindefinitely
AT mckennamalachij shoulddenosumabtreatmentforosteoporosisbecontinuedindefinitely
AT crowleyrachelk shoulddenosumabtreatmentforosteoporosisbecontinuedindefinitely