Cargando…
Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the pullout strength of six different pedicle screw thread patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 sheep spines were divided into six groups including six spines in each group: fully threaded cortical (Type A), fully threaded spongeous (Type B), fully cor...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bayçınar Medical Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.77004 |
_version_ | 1783684129367261184 |
---|---|
author | Karakaşlı, Ahmet Acar, Nihat Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra |
author_facet | Karakaşlı, Ahmet Acar, Nihat Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra |
author_sort | Karakaşlı, Ahmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the pullout strength of six different pedicle screw thread patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 sheep spines were divided into six groups including six spines in each group: fully threaded cortical (Type A), fully threaded spongeous (Type B), fully cortical threads in the proximal half and fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type C), fully spongeous threads in the proximal half and fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type D), unthreaded proximal half with fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type E), and unthreaded proximal half with fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type F). The axial compression-traction machine was used for biomechanical testing at a pullout rate of 1 mm/min. RESULTS: The mean values of pullout strength of the groups A, B, C, D, E, and F were 1112±7.52 N, 986±8.34 N, 646±3.88 N, 676±7.16 N, 609±9.52 N, and 769±6.49 N, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the screw groups A and B, C, D, E and F (p=0.036, p=0.028, p=0.04, p=0.039, and p=0.046, respectively). A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups B versus C and E (p=0.037 and p=0.021, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups B versus D and F (p=0.35 and p=0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fully threaded cortical pedicular screw design exhibited the strongest bone grasp compared to other thread designs. Further studies should be conducted in multidirectional force pattern on human spine to assess the six screw thread designs in a closer real-life setting simulation model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8073434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bayçınar Medical Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80734342021-04-26 Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs Karakaşlı, Ahmet Acar, Nihat Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the pullout strength of six different pedicle screw thread patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 sheep spines were divided into six groups including six spines in each group: fully threaded cortical (Type A), fully threaded spongeous (Type B), fully cortical threads in the proximal half and fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type C), fully spongeous threads in the proximal half and fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type D), unthreaded proximal half with fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type E), and unthreaded proximal half with fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type F). The axial compression-traction machine was used for biomechanical testing at a pullout rate of 1 mm/min. RESULTS: The mean values of pullout strength of the groups A, B, C, D, E, and F were 1112±7.52 N, 986±8.34 N, 646±3.88 N, 676±7.16 N, 609±9.52 N, and 769±6.49 N, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the screw groups A and B, C, D, E and F (p=0.036, p=0.028, p=0.04, p=0.039, and p=0.046, respectively). A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups B versus C and E (p=0.037 and p=0.021, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups B versus D and F (p=0.35 and p=0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fully threaded cortical pedicular screw design exhibited the strongest bone grasp compared to other thread designs. Further studies should be conducted in multidirectional force pattern on human spine to assess the six screw thread designs in a closer real-life setting simulation model. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8073434/ /pubmed/33463436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.77004 Text en Copyright © 2021, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karakaşlı, Ahmet Acar, Nihat Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
title | Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
title_full | Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
title_short | Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
title_sort | biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.77004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karakaslıahmet biomechanicalcomparisonofpulloutstrengthsofsixpediclescrewswithdifferentthreaddesigns AT acarnihat biomechanicalcomparisonofpulloutstrengthsofsixpediclescrewswithdifferentthreaddesigns AT husemoglurbugra biomechanicalcomparisonofpulloutstrengthsofsixpediclescrewswithdifferentthreaddesigns |