Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the pullout strength of six different pedicle screw thread patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 sheep spines were divided into six groups including six spines in each group: fully threaded cortical (Type A), fully threaded spongeous (Type B), fully cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karakaşlı, Ahmet, Acar, Nihat, Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463436
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.77004
_version_ 1783684129367261184
author Karakaşlı, Ahmet
Acar, Nihat
Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra
author_facet Karakaşlı, Ahmet
Acar, Nihat
Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra
author_sort Karakaşlı, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the pullout strength of six different pedicle screw thread patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 sheep spines were divided into six groups including six spines in each group: fully threaded cortical (Type A), fully threaded spongeous (Type B), fully cortical threads in the proximal half and fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type C), fully spongeous threads in the proximal half and fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type D), unthreaded proximal half with fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type E), and unthreaded proximal half with fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type F). The axial compression-traction machine was used for biomechanical testing at a pullout rate of 1 mm/min. RESULTS: The mean values of pullout strength of the groups A, B, C, D, E, and F were 1112±7.52 N, 986±8.34 N, 646±3.88 N, 676±7.16 N, 609±9.52 N, and 769±6.49 N, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the screw groups A and B, C, D, E and F (p=0.036, p=0.028, p=0.04, p=0.039, and p=0.046, respectively). A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups B versus C and E (p=0.037 and p=0.021, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups B versus D and F (p=0.35 and p=0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fully threaded cortical pedicular screw design exhibited the strongest bone grasp compared to other thread designs. Further studies should be conducted in multidirectional force pattern on human spine to assess the six screw thread designs in a closer real-life setting simulation model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8073434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80734342021-04-26 Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs Karakaşlı, Ahmet Acar, Nihat Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the pullout strength of six different pedicle screw thread patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 sheep spines were divided into six groups including six spines in each group: fully threaded cortical (Type A), fully threaded spongeous (Type B), fully cortical threads in the proximal half and fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type C), fully spongeous threads in the proximal half and fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type D), unthreaded proximal half with fully spongeous threads in the distal half (Type E), and unthreaded proximal half with fully cortical threads in the distal half (Type F). The axial compression-traction machine was used for biomechanical testing at a pullout rate of 1 mm/min. RESULTS: The mean values of pullout strength of the groups A, B, C, D, E, and F were 1112±7.52 N, 986±8.34 N, 646±3.88 N, 676±7.16 N, 609±9.52 N, and 769±6.49 N, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the screw groups A and B, C, D, E and F (p=0.036, p=0.028, p=0.04, p=0.039, and p=0.046, respectively). A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups B versus C and E (p=0.037 and p=0.021, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups B versus D and F (p=0.35 and p=0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fully threaded cortical pedicular screw design exhibited the strongest bone grasp compared to other thread designs. Further studies should be conducted in multidirectional force pattern on human spine to assess the six screw thread designs in a closer real-life setting simulation model. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8073434/ /pubmed/33463436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.77004 Text en Copyright © 2021, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karakaşlı, Ahmet
Acar, Nihat
Hüsemoğlu, R. Buğra
Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
title Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
title_full Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
title_short Biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
title_sort biomechanical comparison of pullout strengths of six pedicle screws with different thread designs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33463436
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.77004
work_keys_str_mv AT karakaslıahmet biomechanicalcomparisonofpulloutstrengthsofsixpediclescrewswithdifferentthreaddesigns
AT acarnihat biomechanicalcomparisonofpulloutstrengthsofsixpediclescrewswithdifferentthreaddesigns
AT husemoglurbugra biomechanicalcomparisonofpulloutstrengthsofsixpediclescrewswithdifferentthreaddesigns